Skip to content

XLY vs. IWS: What’s The Difference?

The Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and the iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. XLY is a SPDR State Street Global Advisors Consumer Cyclical fund and IWS is a iShares Mid-Cap Value fund. So, what’s the difference between XLY and IWS? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of XLY is 0.11 percentage points lower than IWS’s (0.12% vs. 0.23%). XLY also has a higher exposure to the consumer cyclical sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, XLY has provided higher returns than IWS over the past 11 years.

In this article, we’ll compare XLY vs. IWS. We’ll look at annual returns and industry exposure, as well as at their holdings and portfolio growth. Moreover, I’ll also discuss XLY’s and IWS’s risk metrics, fund composition, and performance and examine how these affect their overall returns.

TIP: Keep track of all your investments with Personal Capital. I use this amazing tool to aggregate all investments in one place and make sure I'm on track to financial freedom. Oh, and did I mention it's free? Try it out here (link to Personal Capital).

Summary

XLYIWS
NameConsumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR FundiShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
CategoryConsumer CyclicalMid-Cap Value
IssuerSPDR State Street Global AdvisorsiShares
AUM20.21B14.24B
Avg. Return18.86%12.35%
Div. Yield0.63%1.34%
Expense Ratio0.12%0.23%

The Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) is a Consumer Cyclical fund that is issued by SPDR State Street Global Advisors. It currently has 20.21B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 18.86% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.63% with an expense ratio of 0.12%.

The iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) is a Mid-Cap Value fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 14.24B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 12.35% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.34% with an expense ratio of 0.23%.

XLY’s dividend yield is 0.71% lower than that of IWS (0.63% vs. 1.34%). Also, XLY yielded on average 6.52% more per year over the past decade (18.86% vs. 12.35%). The expense ratio of XLY is 0.11 percentage points lower than IWS’s (0.12% vs. 0.23%).

FYI: The best way I've found to invest in ETFs is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

XLY vs. IWS - Industry Exposure

XLYIWS
Technology0.57%11.39%
Industrials0.0%14.6%
Energy0.0%4.71%
Communication Services0.0%4.08%
Utilities0.0%6.97%
Healthcare0.0%8.56%
Consumer Defensive5.34%4.76%
Real Estate0.0%11.71%
Financial Services0.0%15.75%
Consumer Cyclical94.1%12.07%
Basic Materials0.0%5.4%

The Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has the most exposure to the Consumer Cyclical sector at 94.1%. This is followed by Consumer Defensive and Technology at 5.34% and 0.57% respectively. Financial Services (0.0%), Real Estate (0.0%), and Healthcare (0.0%) only make up 0.00% of the fund’s total assets.

XLY’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Utilities, Communication Services, Energy, Industrials, and Technology stocks at 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.57%.

The iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) has the most exposure to the Financial Services sector at 15.75%. This is followed by Industrials and Consumer Cyclical at 14.6% and 12.07% respectively. Energy (4.71%), Consumer Defensive (4.76%), and Basic Materials (5.4%) only make up 14.87% of the fund’s total assets.

IWS’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Utilities, Healthcare, Technology, Real Estate, and Consumer Cyclical stocks at 6.97%, 8.56%, 11.39%, 11.71%, and 12.07%.

XLY is 82.03% more exposed to the Consumer Cyclical sector than IWS (94.1% vs 12.07%). XLY’s exposure to Consumer Defensive and Technology stocks is 0.58% higher and 10.82% lower respectively (5.34% vs. 4.76% and 0.57% vs. 11.39%). In total, Financial Services, Real Estate, and Healthcare also make up 36.02% less of the fund’s holdings compared to IWS (0.00% vs. 36.02%).

Holdings

XLY - Holdings

XLY HoldingsWeight
Amazon.com Inc22.9%
Tesla Inc13.5%
The Home Depot Inc8.74%
McDonald’s Corp4.5%
Nike Inc B4.45%
Lowe’s Companies Inc3.58%
Starbucks Corp3.44%
Target Corp3.12%
Booking Holdings Inc2.35%
TJX Companies Inc2.12%

XLY’s Top Holdings are Amazon.com Inc, Tesla Inc, The Home Depot Inc, McDonald’s Corp, and Nike Inc B at 22.9%, 13.5%, 8.74%, 4.5%, and 4.45%.

Lowe’s Companies Inc (3.58%), Starbucks Corp (3.44%), and Target Corp (3.12%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Booking Holdings Inc and TJX Companies Inc are also represented in the XLY’s holdings at 2.35% and 2.12%.

IWS - Holdings

IWS HoldingsWeight
Twitter Inc0.69%
Marvell Technology Inc0.69%
IHS Markit Ltd0.62%
Prudential Financial Inc0.56%
Otis Worldwide Corp Ordinary Shares0.54%
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc0.53%
Xcel Energy Inc0.52%
Motorola Solutions Inc0.52%
Aptiv PLC0.52%
Aflac Inc0.52%

IWS’s Top Holdings are Twitter Inc, Marvell Technology Inc, IHS Markit Ltd, Prudential Financial Inc, and Otis Worldwide Corp Ordinary Shares at 0.69%, 0.69%, 0.62%, 0.56%, and 0.54%.

International Flavors & Fragrances Inc (0.53%), Xcel Energy Inc (0.52%), and Motorola Solutions Inc (0.52%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Aptiv PLC and Aflac Inc are also represented in the IWS’s holdings at 0.52% and 0.52%.

NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).

Risk Analysis

XLYIWS
Mean Return1.471.06
R-squared80.8487.04
Std. Deviation15.9716.03
Alpha6.96-4.11
Beta1.021.1
Sharpe Ratio1.060.75
Treynor Ratio16.6910.3

The Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a Alpha of 6.96 with a R-squared of 80.84 and a Mean Return of 1.47. Its Beta is 1.02 while XLY’s Treynor Ratio is 16.69. Furthermore, the fund has a Sharpe Ratio of 1.06 and a Standard Deviation of 15.97.

The iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) has a Beta of 1.1 with a Treynor Ratio of 10.3 and a Alpha of -4.11. Its Sharpe Ratio is 0.75 while IWS’s Standard Deviation is 16.03. Furthermore, the fund has a R-squared of 87.04 and a Mean Return of 1.06.

XLY’s Mean Return is 0.41 points higher than that of IWS and its R-squared is 6.20 points lower. With a Standard Deviation of 15.97, XLY is slightly less volatile than IWS. The Alpha and Beta of XLY are 11.07 points higher and 0.08 points lower than IWS’s Alpha and Beta.

FYI: Another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector is by investing in real estate debt. Groundfloor offers fantastic short-term, high-yield bonds that can add diversification to your portfolio!

Performance

Annual Returns

XLY vs. IWS - Annual Returns

YearXLYIWS
202029.66%4.76%
201928.43%26.78%
20181.66%-12.36%
201722.77%13.1%
20165.87%19.69%
20159.93%-4.93%
20149.49%14.49%
201342.74%33.11%
201223.6%18.27%
20115.98%-1.55%
201027.36%24.46%

XLY had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 42.74%. XLY’s worst year over the past decade yielded 1.66% and occurred in 2018. In most years the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund provided moderate returns such as in 2015, 2017, and 2012 where annual returns amounted to 9.93%, 22.77%, and 23.6% respectively.

The year 2013 was the strongest year for IWS, returning 33.11% on an annual basis. The poorest year for IWS in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -12.36%. Most years the iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2017, 2014, and 2012, when gains were 13.1%, 14.49%, and 18.27% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

XLY vs. IWS - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
XLY$10,000$63,06618.86%
IWS$10,000$33,08312.35%

A $10,000 investment in XLY would have resulted in a final balance of $63,066. This is a profit of $53,066 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 18.86%.

With a $10,000 investment in IWS, the end total would have been $33,083. This equates to a $23,083 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12.35%.

XLY’s CAGR is 6.52 percentage points higher than that of IWS and as a result, would have yielded $29,983 more on a $10,000 investment. Thus, XLY outperformed IWS by 6.52% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *