XLV vs. JPST: What’s The Difference?

The Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) and the JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. XLV is a SPDR State Street Global Advisors Health fund and JPST is a JPMorgan Ultrashort Bond fund. So, what’s the difference between XLV and JPST? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of XLV is 0.06 percentage points lower than JPST’s (0.12% vs. 0.18%). XLV also has a high exposure to the healthcare sector while JPST is mostly comprised of A bonds. Overall, XLV has provided higher returns than JPST over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare XLV vs. JPST. We’ll look at fund composition and performance, as well as at their annual returns and risk metrics. Moreover, I’ll also discuss XLV’s and JPST’s industry exposure, portfolio growth, and holdings and examine how these affect their overall returns.

Summary

XLV JPST
Name Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
Category Health Ultrashort Bond
Issuer SPDR State Street Global Advisors JPMorgan
AUM 27.88B 17.32B
Avg. Return 15.02% 2.57%
Div. Yield 1.4% 0.94%
Expense Ratio 0.12% 0.18%

The Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) is a Health fund that is issued by SPDR State Street Global Advisors. It currently has 27.88B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 15.02% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.4% with an expense ratio of 0.12%.

The JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) is a Ultrashort Bond fund that is issued by JPMorgan. It currently has 17.32B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 2.57% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.94% with an expense ratio of 0.18%.

XLV’s dividend yield is 0.46% higher than that of JPST (1.4% vs. 0.94%). Also, XLV yielded on average 12.45% more per year over the past decade (15.02% vs. 2.57%). The expense ratio of XLV is 0.06 percentage points lower than JPST’s (0.12% vs. 0.18%).

Fund Composition

Holdings

XLV - Holdings

XLV Holdings Weight
Johnson & Johnson 9.19%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 8.01%
Pfizer Inc 4.64%
Abbott Laboratories 4.36%
AbbVie Inc 4.21%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 4.2%
Merck & Co Inc 4.17%
Eli Lilly and Co 3.87%
Danaher Corp 3.61%
Medtronic PLC 3.54%

XLV’s Top Holdings are Johnson & Johnson, UnitedHealth Group Inc, Pfizer Inc, Abbott Laboratories, and AbbVie Inc at 9.19%, 8.01%, 4.64%, 4.36%, and 4.21%.

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc (4.2%), Merck & Co Inc (4.17%), and Eli Lilly and Co (3.87%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Danaher Corp and Medtronic PLC are also represented in the XLV’s holdings at 3.61% and 3.54%.

JPST - Holdings

JPST Bond Sectors Weight
A 39.21%
BBB 36.75%
AAA 14.9%
AA 9.14%
Others 0.0%
Below B 0.0%
B 0.0%
BB 0.0%
US Government 0.0%

JPST’s Top Bond Sectors are ratings of A, BBB, AAA, AA, and Others at 39.21%, 36.75%, 14.9%, 9.14%, and 0.0%. The fund is less weighted towards Below B (0.0%), B (0.0%), and BB (0.0%) rated bonds.

Risk Analysis

XLV JPST
Mean Return 1.27 0
R-squared 58.19 0
Std. Deviation 12.94 0
Alpha 7.75 0
Beta 0.7 0
Sharpe Ratio 1.13 0
Treynor Ratio 21.1 0

The Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) has a Treynor Ratio of 21.1 with a Sharpe Ratio of 1.13 and a Mean Return of 1.27. Its Alpha is 7.75 while XLV’s R-squared is 58.19. Furthermore, the fund has a Beta of 0.7 and a Standard Deviation of 12.94.

The JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) has a Sharpe Ratio of 0 with a Beta of 0 and a Alpha of 0. Its Treynor Ratio is 0 while JPST’s Mean Return is 0. Furthermore, the fund has a R-squared of 0 and a Standard Deviation of 0.

XLV’s Mean Return is 1.27 points higher than that of JPST and its R-squared is 58.19 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 12.94, XLV is slightly more volatile than JPST. The Alpha and Beta of XLV are 7.75 points higher and 0.70 points higher than JPST’s Alpha and Beta.

Performance

Annual Returns

XLV vs. JPST - Annual Returns

Year XLV JPST
2020 13.33% 2.17%
2019 20.63% 3.36%
2018 6.3% 2.19%
2017 21.7% 0.0%
2016 -2.83% 0.0%
2015 6.82% 0.0%
2014 25.17% 0.0%
2013 41.24% 0.0%
2012 17.56% 0.0%
2011 12.44% 0.0%
2010 2.91% 0.0%

XLV had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 41.24%. XLV’s worst year over the past decade yielded -2.83% and occurred in 2016. In most years the Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund provided moderate returns such as in 2011, 2020, and 2012 where annual returns amounted to 12.44%, 13.33%, and 17.56% respectively.

The year 2019 was the strongest year for JPST, returning 3.36% on an annual basis. The poorest year for JPST in the last ten years was 2017, with a yield of 0.0%. Most years the JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2013, 2012, and 2011, when gains were 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

XLV vs. JPST - Portfolio Growth

Fund Initial Balance Final Balance CAGR
XLV $10,000 $14,532 15.02%
JPST $10,000 $10,791 2.57%

A $10,000 investment in XLV would have resulted in a final balance of $14,532. This is a profit of $4,532 over 3 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 15.02%.

With a $10,000 investment in JPST, the end total would have been $10,791. This equates to a $791 profit over 3 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 2.57%.

XLV’s CAGR is 12.45 percentage points higher than that of JPST and as a result, would have yielded $3,741 more on a $10,000 investment. Thus, XLV outperformed JPST by 12.45% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

2) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

3) If you are interested in crypto, check out Gemini. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to the growing crypto space and Gemini has just been a breeze to use. Once you register, make sure to also open an Active Trader account to buy crypto at the lowest fees on the market (just 0.03%!).

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Leave a Reply