Skip to content

XLF vs. USMV: What’s The Difference?

The Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) and the iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. XLF is a SPDR State Street Global Advisors Financial fund and USMV is a iShares Large Blend fund. So, what’s the difference between XLF and USMV? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of XLF is 0.03 percentage points lower than USMV’s (0.12% vs. 0.15%). XLF also has a higher exposure to the financial services sector and a higher standard deviation. Overall, XLF has provided lower returns than USMV over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare XLF vs. USMV. We’ll look at portfolio growth and fund composition, as well as at their annual returns and industry exposure. Moreover, I’ll also discuss XLF’s and USMV’s holdings, performance, and risk metrics and examine how these affect their overall returns.

Summary

XLFUSMV
NameFinancial Select Sector SPDR FundiShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
CategoryFinancialLarge Blend
IssuerSPDR State Street Global AdvisorsiShares
AUM40.81B27.6B
Avg. Return12.17%13.89%
Div. Yield1.57%1.5%
Expense Ratio0.12%0.15%

The Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) is a Financial fund that is issued by SPDR State Street Global Advisors. It currently has 40.81B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 12.17% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.57% with an expense ratio of 0.12%.

The iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 27.6B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 13.89% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.5% with an expense ratio of 0.15%.

XLF’s dividend yield is 0.07% higher than that of USMV (1.57% vs. 1.5%). Also, XLF yielded on average 1.73% less per year over the past decade (12.17% vs. 13.89%). The expense ratio of XLF is 0.03 percentage points lower than USMV’s (0.12% vs. 0.15%).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

XLF vs. USMV - Industry Exposure

XLFUSMV
Technology0.0%20.53%
Industrials0.0%10.51%
Energy0.0%0.21%
Communication Services0.0%11.03%
Utilities0.0%6.93%
Healthcare0.0%18.42%
Consumer Defensive0.0%12.82%
Real Estate0.0%2.73%
Financial Services100.0%9.65%
Consumer Cyclical0.0%5.53%
Basic Materials0.0%1.65%

The Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) has the most exposure to the Financial Services sector at 100.0%. This is followed by Technology and Industrials at 0.0% and 0.0% respectively. Consumer Cyclical (0.0%), Real Estate (0.0%), and Consumer Defensive (0.0%) only make up 0.00% of the fund’s total assets.

XLF’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Healthcare, Utilities, Communication Services, Energy, and Industrials stocks at 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0%.

The iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 20.53%. This is followed by Healthcare and Consumer Defensive at 18.42% and 12.82% respectively. Basic Materials (1.65%), Real Estate (2.73%), and Consumer Cyclical (5.53%) only make up 9.91% of the fund’s total assets.

USMV’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Utilities, Financial Services, Industrials, Communication Services, and Consumer Defensive stocks at 6.93%, 9.65%, 10.51%, 11.03%, and 12.82%.

XLF is 90.35% more exposed to the Financial Services sector than USMV (100.0% vs 9.65%). XLF’s exposure to Technology and Industrials stocks is 20.53% lower and 10.51% lower respectively (0.0% vs. 20.53% and 0.0% vs. 10.51%). In total, Consumer Cyclical, Real Estate, and Consumer Defensive also make up 21.08% less of the fund’s holdings compared to USMV (0.00% vs. 21.08%).

Holdings

XLF - Holdings

XLF HoldingsWeight
Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B12.83%
JPMorgan Chase & Co11.47%
Bank of America Corp7.57%
Wells Fargo & Co4.56%
Citigroup Inc3.56%
Morgan Stanley3.32%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc3.15%
BlackRock Inc3.02%
Charles Schwab Corp2.66%
American Express Co2.62%

XLF’s Top Holdings are Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B, JPMorgan Chase & Co, Bank of America Corp, Wells Fargo & Co, and Citigroup Inc at 12.83%, 11.47%, 7.57%, 4.56%, and 3.56%.

Morgan Stanley (3.32%), Goldman Sachs Group Inc (3.15%), and BlackRock Inc (3.02%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Charles Schwab Corp and American Express Co are also represented in the XLF’s holdings at 2.66% and 2.62%.

USMV - Holdings

USMV HoldingsWeight
Eli Lilly and Co1.64%
Microsoft Corp1.62%
T-Mobile US Inc1.51%
Accenture PLC Class A1.51%
Visa Inc Class A1.49%
Waste Management Inc1.45%
Adobe Inc1.45%
The Kroger Co1.44%
Johnson & Johnson1.42%
Gilead Sciences Inc1.42%

USMV’s Top Holdings are Eli Lilly and Co, Microsoft Corp, T-Mobile US Inc, Accenture PLC Class A, and Visa Inc Class A at 1.64%, 1.62%, 1.51%, 1.51%, and 1.49%.

Waste Management Inc (1.45%), Adobe Inc (1.45%), and The Kroger Co (1.44%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Johnson & Johnson and Gilead Sciences Inc are also represented in the USMV’s holdings at 1.42% and 1.42%.

Risk Analysis

XLFUSMV
Mean Return1.210
R-squared73.260
Std. Deviation18.860
Alpha2.630
Beta1.150
Sharpe Ratio0.740
Treynor Ratio11.250

The Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) has a R-squared of 73.26 with a Alpha of 2.63 and a Beta of 1.15. Its Standard Deviation is 18.86 while XLF’s Mean Return is 1.21. Furthermore, the fund has a Sharpe Ratio of 0.74 and a Treynor Ratio of 11.25.

The iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) has a Mean Return of 0 with a Beta of 0 and a Standard Deviation of 0. Its R-squared is 0 while USMV’s Sharpe Ratio is 0. Furthermore, the fund has a Alpha of 0 and a Treynor Ratio of 0.

XLF’s Mean Return is 1.21 points higher than that of USMV and its R-squared is 73.26 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 18.86, XLF is slightly more volatile than USMV. The Alpha and Beta of XLF are 2.63 points higher and 1.15 points higher than USMV’s Alpha and Beta.

Performance

Annual Returns

XLF vs. USMV - Annual Returns

YearXLFUSMV
2020-1.68%5.6%
201931.88%27.77%
2018-13.09%1.36%
201722.03%18.97%
201622.55%10.5%
2015-1.6%5.5%
201415.02%16.34%
201335.37%25.11%
201228.53%11.04%
2011-17.16%0.0%
201011.97%0.0%

XLF had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 35.37%. XLF’s worst year over the past decade yielded -17.16% and occurred in 2011. In most years the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund provided moderate returns such as in 2010, 2014, and 2017 where annual returns amounted to 11.97%, 15.02%, and 22.03% respectively.

The year 2019 was the strongest year for USMV, returning 27.77% on an annual basis. The poorest year for USMV in the last ten years was 2011, with a yield of 0.0%. Most years the iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2020, 2016, and 2012, when gains were 5.6%, 10.5%, and 11.04% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

XLF vs. USMV - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
XLF$10,000$25,82012.17%
USMV$10,000$27,60713.89%

A $10,000 investment in XLF would have resulted in a final balance of $25,820. This is a profit of $15,820 over 8 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12.17%.

With a $10,000 investment in USMV, the end total would have been $27,607. This equates to a $17,607 profit over 8 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.89%.

XLF’s CAGR is 1.73 percentage points lower than that of USMV and as a result, would have yielded $1,787 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, XLF performed worse than USMV by 1.73% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

9125d72911bdc1f2dd2d1918a15aaf4c?s=250&d=mm&r=g

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *