Skip to content

XLF vs. IXUS: What’s The Difference?

The Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) and the iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. XLF is a SPDR State Street Global Advisors Financial fund and IXUS is a iShares Foreign Large Blend fund. So, what’s the difference between XLF and IXUS? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of XLF is 0.03 percentage points higher than IXUS’s (0.12% vs. 0.09%). XLF also has a higher exposure to the financial services sector and a higher standard deviation. Overall, XLF has provided higher returns than IXUS over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare XLF vs. IXUS. We’ll look at annual returns and fund composition, as well as at their risk metrics and holdings. Moreover, I’ll also discuss XLF’s and IXUS’s portfolio growth, performance, and industry exposure and examine how these affect their overall returns.

Summary

XLFIXUS
NameFinancial Select Sector SPDR FundiShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
CategoryFinancialForeign Large Blend
IssuerSPDR State Street Global AdvisorsiShares
AUM40.81B29.54B
Avg. Return12.17%6.09%
Div. Yield1.57%2.13%
Expense Ratio0.12%0.09%

The Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) is a Financial fund that is issued by SPDR State Street Global Advisors. It currently has 40.81B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 12.17% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.57% with an expense ratio of 0.12%.

The iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) is a Foreign Large Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 29.54B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 6.09% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 2.13% with an expense ratio of 0.09%.

XLF’s dividend yield is 0.56% lower than that of IXUS (1.57% vs. 2.13%). Also, XLF yielded on average 6.08% more per year over the past decade (12.17% vs. 6.09%). The expense ratio of XLF is 0.03 percentage points higher than IXUS’s (0.12% vs. 0.09%).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

XLF vs. IXUS - Industry Exposure

XLFIXUS
Technology0.0%13.24%
Industrials0.0%12.78%
Energy0.0%4.39%
Communication Services0.0%7.09%
Utilities0.0%2.95%
Healthcare0.0%9.29%
Consumer Defensive0.0%8.19%
Real Estate0.0%3.66%
Financial Services100.0%17.34%
Consumer Cyclical0.0%12.57%
Basic Materials0.0%8.5%

The Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) has the most exposure to the Financial Services sector at 100.0%. This is followed by Technology and Industrials at 0.0% and 0.0% respectively. Consumer Cyclical (0.0%), Real Estate (0.0%), and Consumer Defensive (0.0%) only make up 0.00% of the fund’s total assets.

XLF’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Healthcare, Utilities, Communication Services, Energy, and Industrials stocks at 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0%.

The iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) has the most exposure to the Financial Services sector at 17.34%. This is followed by Technology and Industrials at 13.24% and 12.78% respectively. Real Estate (3.66%), Energy (4.39%), and Communication Services (7.09%) only make up 15.14% of the fund’s total assets.

IXUS’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Basic Materials, Healthcare, Consumer Cyclical, and Industrials stocks at 8.19%, 8.5%, 9.29%, 12.57%, and 12.78%.

XLF is 82.66% more exposed to the Financial Services sector than IXUS (100.0% vs 17.34%). XLF’s exposure to Technology and Industrials stocks is 13.24% lower and 12.78% lower respectively (0.0% vs. 13.24% and 0.0% vs. 12.78%). In total, Consumer Cyclical, Real Estate, and Consumer Defensive also make up 24.42% less of the fund’s holdings compared to IXUS (0.00% vs. 24.42%).

Holdings

XLF - Holdings

XLF HoldingsWeight
Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B12.83%
JPMorgan Chase & Co11.47%
Bank of America Corp7.57%
Wells Fargo & Co4.56%
Citigroup Inc3.56%
Morgan Stanley3.32%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc3.15%
BlackRock Inc3.02%
Charles Schwab Corp2.66%
American Express Co2.62%

XLF’s Top Holdings are Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B, JPMorgan Chase & Co, Bank of America Corp, Wells Fargo & Co, and Citigroup Inc at 12.83%, 11.47%, 7.57%, 4.56%, and 3.56%.

Morgan Stanley (3.32%), Goldman Sachs Group Inc (3.15%), and BlackRock Inc (3.02%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Charles Schwab Corp and American Express Co are also represented in the XLF’s holdings at 2.66% and 2.62%.

IXUS - Holdings

IXUS HoldingsWeight
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd1.64%
Tencent Holdings Ltd1.35%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares1.34%
Nestle SA1.1%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd1.06%
ASML Holding NV0.9%
Roche Holding AG0.81%
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE0.67%
Novartis AG0.62%
Toyota Motor Corp0.59%

IXUS’s Top Holdings are Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd, Tencent Holdings Ltd, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares, Nestle SA, and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd at 1.64%, 1.35%, 1.34%, 1.1%, and 1.06%.

ASML Holding NV (0.9%), Roche Holding AG (0.81%), and LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE (0.67%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Novartis AG and Toyota Motor Corp are also represented in the IXUS’s holdings at 0.62% and 0.59%.

Risk Analysis

XLFIXUS
Mean Return1.210
R-squared73.260
Std. Deviation18.860
Alpha2.630
Beta1.150
Sharpe Ratio0.740
Treynor Ratio11.250

The Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) has a Beta of 1.15 with a Sharpe Ratio of 0.74 and a Mean Return of 1.21. Its Standard Deviation is 18.86 while XLF’s Treynor Ratio is 11.25. Furthermore, the fund has a Alpha of 2.63 and a R-squared of 73.26.

The iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) has a Sharpe Ratio of 0 with a Standard Deviation of 0 and a Beta of 0. Its Treynor Ratio is 0 while IXUS’s Mean Return is 0. Furthermore, the fund has a R-squared of 0 and a Alpha of 0.

XLF’s Mean Return is 1.21 points higher than that of IXUS and its R-squared is 73.26 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 18.86, XLF is slightly more volatile than IXUS. The Alpha and Beta of XLF are 2.63 points higher and 1.15 points higher than IXUS’s Alpha and Beta.

Performance

Annual Returns

XLF vs. IXUS - Annual Returns

YearXLFIXUS
2020-1.68%11.14%
201931.88%21.85%
2018-13.09%-14.55%
201722.03%28.08%
201622.55%4.66%
2015-1.6%-4.62%
201415.02%-3.96%
201335.37%15.85%
201228.53%0.0%
2011-17.16%0.0%
201011.97%0.0%

XLF had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 35.37%. XLF’s worst year over the past decade yielded -17.16% and occurred in 2011. In most years the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund provided moderate returns such as in 2010, 2014, and 2017 where annual returns amounted to 11.97%, 15.02%, and 22.03% respectively.

The year 2017 was the strongest year for IXUS, returning 28.08% on an annual basis. The poorest year for IXUS in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -14.55%. Most years the iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2011, 2010, and 2016, when gains were 0.0%, 0.0%, and 4.66% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

XLF vs. IXUS - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
XLF$10,000$19,07312.17%
IXUS$10,000$14,2096.09%

A $10,000 investment in XLF would have resulted in a final balance of $19,073. This is a profit of $9,073 over 7 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12.17%.

With a $10,000 investment in IXUS, the end total would have been $14,209. This equates to a $4,209 profit over 7 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.09%.

XLF’s CAGR is 6.08 percentage points higher than that of IXUS and as a result, would have yielded $4,864 more on a $10,000 investment. Thus, XLF outperformed IXUS by 6.08% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

9125d72911bdc1f2dd2d1918a15aaf4c?s=250&d=mm&r=g

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *