Skip to content

VV vs. IWP: What’s The Difference?

The Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares (VV) and the iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. VV is a Vanguard Large Blend fund and IWP is a iShares Mid-Cap Growth fund. So, what’s the difference between VV and IWP? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of VV is 0.20 percentage points lower than IWP’s (0.04% vs. 0.24%). VV also has a lower exposure to the technology sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, VV has provided lower returns than IWP over the past 11 years.

In this article, we’ll compare VV vs. IWP. We’ll look at holdings and performance, as well as at their risk metrics and fund composition. Moreover, I’ll also discuss VV’s and IWP’s industry exposure, annual returns, and portfolio growth and examine how these affect their overall returns.

Summary

VVIWP
NameVanguard Large-Cap Index Fund ETF SharesiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
CategoryLarge BlendMid-Cap Growth
IssuerVanguardiShares
AUM37.65B15.7B
Avg. Return14.75%16.75%
Div. Yield1.26%0.26%
Expense Ratio0.04%0.24%

The Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares (VV) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by Vanguard. It currently has 37.65B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 14.75% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.26% with an expense ratio of 0.04%.

The iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) is a Mid-Cap Growth fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 15.7B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 16.75% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.26% with an expense ratio of 0.24%.

VV’s dividend yield is 1.00% higher than that of IWP (1.26% vs. 0.26%). Also, VV yielded on average 2.00% less per year over the past decade (14.75% vs. 16.75%). The expense ratio of VV is 0.20 percentage points lower than IWP’s (0.04% vs. 0.24%).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

VV vs. IWP - Industry Exposure

VVIWP
Technology25.38%33.88%
Industrials8.39%14.09%
Energy2.62%1.51%
Communication Services11.68%6.32%
Utilities2.35%0.16%
Healthcare13.22%16.79%
Consumer Defensive6.06%2.32%
Real Estate2.7%2.46%
Financial Services13.82%4.52%
Consumer Cyclical11.65%16.09%
Basic Materials2.13%1.86%

The Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares (VV) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 25.38%. This is followed by Financial Services and Healthcare at 13.82% and 13.22% respectively. Utilities (2.35%), Energy (2.62%), and Real Estate (2.7%) only make up 7.67% of the fund’s total assets.

VV’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Industrials, Consumer Cyclical, Communication Services, and Healthcare stocks at 6.06%, 8.39%, 11.65%, 11.68%, and 13.22%.

The iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 33.88%. This is followed by Healthcare and Consumer Cyclical at 16.79% and 16.09% respectively. Energy (1.51%), Basic Materials (1.86%), and Consumer Defensive (2.32%) only make up 5.69% of the fund’s total assets.

IWP’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Real Estate, Financial Services, Communication Services, Industrials, and Consumer Cyclical stocks at 2.46%, 4.52%, 6.32%, 14.09%, and 16.09%.

VV is 8.50% less exposed to the Technology sector than IWP (25.38% vs 33.88%). VV’s exposure to Financial Services and Healthcare stocks is 9.30% higher and 3.57% lower respectively (13.82% vs. 4.52% and 13.22% vs. 16.79%). In total, Utilities, Energy, and Real Estate also make up 3.54% more of the fund’s holdings compared to IWP (7.67% vs. 4.13%).

Holdings

VV - Holdings

VV HoldingsWeight
Apple Inc5.7%
Microsoft Corp5.35%
Amazon.com Inc3.87%
Facebook Inc Class A2.19%
Alphabet Inc Class A1.93%
Alphabet Inc Class C1.81%
Tesla Inc1.37%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B1.3%
NVIDIA Corp1.24%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.24%

VV’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc Class A, and Alphabet Inc Class A at 5.7%, 5.35%, 3.87%, 2.19%, and 1.93%.

Alphabet Inc Class C (1.81%), Tesla Inc (1.37%), and Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B (1.3%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. NVIDIA Corp and JPMorgan Chase & Co are also represented in the VV’s holdings at 1.24% and 1.24%.

IWP - Holdings

IWP HoldingsWeight
IDEXX Laboratories Inc1.3%
DocuSign Inc1.3%
Roku Inc Class A1.29%
Match Group Inc1.06%
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc1.06%
Pinterest Inc1.05%
Veeva Systems Inc Class A1.04%
Palantir Technologies Inc Ordinary Shares – Class A1.04%
Lululemon Athletica Inc1.01%
DexCom Inc1.0%

IWP’s Top Holdings are IDEXX Laboratories Inc, DocuSign Inc, Roku Inc Class A, Match Group Inc, and Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc at 1.3%, 1.3%, 1.29%, 1.06%, and 1.06%.

Pinterest Inc (1.05%), Veeva Systems Inc Class A (1.04%), and Palantir Technologies Inc Ordinary Shares – Class A (1.04%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Lululemon Athletica Inc and DexCom Inc are also represented in the IWP’s holdings at 1.01% and 1.0%.

Risk Analysis

VVIWP
Mean Return1.241.27
R-squared99.8687.01
Std. Deviation13.7516.05
Alpha-0.08-1.03
Beta1.011.1
Sharpe Ratio1.040.91
Treynor Ratio14.1412.98

The Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares (VV) has a Mean Return of 1.24 with a R-squared of 99.86 and a Alpha of -0.08. Its Treynor Ratio is 14.14 while VV’s Sharpe Ratio is 1.04. Furthermore, the fund has a Beta of 1.01 and a Standard Deviation of 13.75.

The iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) has a Alpha of -1.03 with a Mean Return of 1.27 and a Treynor Ratio of 12.98. Its Sharpe Ratio is 0.91 while IWP’s Standard Deviation is 16.05. Furthermore, the fund has a R-squared of 87.01 and a Beta of 1.1.

VV’s Mean Return is 0.03 points lower than that of IWP and its R-squared is 12.85 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 13.75, VV is slightly less volatile than IWP. The Alpha and Beta of VV are 0.95 points higher and 0.09 points lower than IWP’s Alpha and Beta.

Performance

Annual Returns

VV vs. IWP - Annual Returns

YearVVIWP
202020.99%35.29%
201931.39%35.14%
2018-4.44%-4.95%
201722.03%24.98%
201611.65%7.15%
20151.07%-0.39%
201413.39%11.68%
201332.65%35.44%
201216.09%15.62%
20111.58%-1.82%
201015.81%26.1%

VV had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 32.65%. VV’s worst year over the past decade yielded -4.44% and occurred in 2018. In most years the Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2010, and 2012 where annual returns amounted to 13.39%, 15.81%, and 16.09% respectively.

The year 2013 was the strongest year for IWP, returning 35.44% on an annual basis. The poorest year for IWP in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -4.95%. Most years the iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2014, 2012, and 2017, when gains were 11.68%, 15.62%, and 24.98% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

VV vs. IWP - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
VV$10,000$42,97014.75%
IWP$10,000$50,19116.75%

A $10,000 investment in VV would have resulted in a final balance of $42,970. This is a profit of $32,970 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.75%.

With a $10,000 investment in IWP, the end total would have been $50,191. This equates to a $40,191 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 16.75%.

VV’s CAGR is 2.00 percentage points lower than that of IWP and as a result, would have yielded $7,221 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, VV performed worse than IWP by 2.00% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Marvin Allen

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *