Skip to content

VTV vs. XLC: What’s The Difference?

The Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares (VTV) and the Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. VTV is a Vanguard Large Value fund and XLC is a SPDR State Street Global Advisors Communications fund. So, what’s the difference between VTV and XLC? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of VTV is 0.08 percentage points lower than XLC’s (0.04% vs. 0.12%). VTV also has a higher exposure to the financial services sector and a higher standard deviation. Overall, VTV has provided lower returns than XLC over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare VTV vs. XLC. We’ll look at annual returns and holdings, as well as at their risk metrics and performance. Moreover, I’ll also discuss VTV’s and XLC’s industry exposure, fund composition, and portfolio growth and examine how these affect their overall returns.

TIP: Keep track of all your investments with Personal Capital. I use this amazing tool to aggregate all investments in one place and make sure I'm on track to financial freedom. Oh, and did I mention it's free? Try it out here (link to Personal Capital).

Summary

VTVXLC
NameVanguard Value Index Fund ETF SharesCommunication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
CategoryLarge ValueCommunications
IssuerVanguardSPDR State Street Global Advisors
AUM125.77B14.09B
Avg. Return12.07%29.04%
Div. Yield2.15%0.62%
Expense Ratio0.04%0.12%

The Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares (VTV) is a Large Value fund that is issued by Vanguard. It currently has 125.77B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 12.07% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 2.15% with an expense ratio of 0.04%.

The Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) is a Communications fund that is issued by SPDR State Street Global Advisors. It currently has 14.09B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 29.04% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.62% with an expense ratio of 0.12%.

VTV’s dividend yield is 1.53% higher than that of XLC (2.15% vs. 0.62%). Also, VTV yielded on average 16.96% less per year over the past decade (12.07% vs. 29.04%). The expense ratio of VTV is 0.08 percentage points lower than XLC’s (0.04% vs. 0.12%).

FYI: The best way I've found to invest in ETFs is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

VTV vs. XLC - Industry Exposure

VTVXLC
Technology7.86%0.0%
Industrials12.61%0.0%
Energy5.59%0.0%
Communication Services5.49%100.0%
Utilities5.37%0.0%
Healthcare19.84%0.0%
Consumer Defensive10.72%0.0%
Real Estate3.01%0.0%
Financial Services22.81%0.0%
Consumer Cyclical3.79%0.0%
Basic Materials2.91%0.0%

The Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares (VTV) has the most exposure to the Financial Services sector at 22.81%. This is followed by Healthcare and Industrials at 19.84% and 12.61% respectively. Real Estate (3.01%), Consumer Cyclical (3.79%), and Utilities (5.37%) only make up 12.17% of the fund’s total assets.

VTV’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Communication Services, Energy, Technology, Consumer Defensive, and Industrials stocks at 5.49%, 5.59%, 7.86%, 10.72%, and 12.61%.

The Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) has the most exposure to the Communication Services sector at 100.0%. This is followed by Technology and Industrials at 0.0% and 0.0% respectively. Consumer Cyclical (0.0%), Financial Services (0.0%), and Real Estate (0.0%) only make up 0.00% of the fund’s total assets.

XLC’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Healthcare, Utilities, Energy, and Industrials stocks at 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0%.

VTV is 22.81% more exposed to the Financial Services sector than XLC (22.81% vs 0.0%). VTV’s exposure to Healthcare and Industrials stocks is 19.84% higher and 12.61% higher respectively (19.84% vs. 0.0% and 12.61% vs. 0.0%). In total, Real Estate, Consumer Cyclical, and Utilities also make up 12.17% more of the fund’s holdings compared to XLC (12.17% vs. 0.00%).

Holdings

VTV - Holdings

VTV HoldingsWeight
Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B2.98%
JPMorgan Chase & Co2.82%
Johnson & Johnson2.6%
UnitedHealth Group Inc2.27%
Procter & Gamble Co1.98%
Bank of America Corp1.91%
Exxon Mobil Corp1.6%
Comcast Corp Class A1.57%
Intel Corp1.36%
Verizon Communications Inc1.32%

VTV’s Top Holdings are Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B, JPMorgan Chase & Co, Johnson & Johnson, UnitedHealth Group Inc, and Procter & Gamble Co at 2.98%, 2.82%, 2.6%, 2.27%, and 1.98%.

Bank of America Corp (1.91%), Exxon Mobil Corp (1.6%), and Comcast Corp Class A (1.57%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Intel Corp and Verizon Communications Inc are also represented in the VTV’s holdings at 1.36% and 1.32%.

XLC - Holdings

XLC HoldingsWeight
Facebook Inc A23.75%
Alphabet Inc A11.49%
Alphabet Inc Class C11.16%
Netflix Inc4.78%
Charter Communications Inc A4.65%
Comcast Corp Class A4.44%
T-Mobile US Inc4.41%
The Walt Disney Co4.39%
AT&T Inc4.35%
Verizon Communications Inc4.33%

XLC’s Top Holdings are Facebook Inc A, Alphabet Inc A, Alphabet Inc Class C, Netflix Inc, and Charter Communications Inc A at 23.75%, 11.49%, 11.16%, 4.78%, and 4.65%.

Comcast Corp Class A (4.44%), T-Mobile US Inc (4.41%), and The Walt Disney Co (4.39%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. AT&T Inc and Verizon Communications Inc are also represented in the XLC’s holdings at 4.35% and 4.33%.

NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).

Risk Analysis

VTVXLC
Mean Return1.050
R-squared92.610
Std. Deviation13.780
Alpha-1.920
Beta0.980
Sharpe Ratio0.870
Treynor Ratio11.940

The Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares (VTV) has a Treynor Ratio of 11.94 with a Sharpe Ratio of 0.87 and a Alpha of -1.92. Its Standard Deviation is 13.78 while VTV’s Mean Return is 1.05. Furthermore, the fund has a R-squared of 92.61 and a Beta of 0.98.

The Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) has a Sharpe Ratio of 0 with a Alpha of 0 and a Beta of 0. Its Mean Return is 0 while XLC’s R-squared is 0. Furthermore, the fund has a Treynor Ratio of 0 and a Standard Deviation of 0.

VTV’s Mean Return is 1.05 points higher than that of XLC and its R-squared is 92.61 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 13.78, VTV is slightly more volatile than XLC. The Alpha and Beta of VTV are 1.92 points lower and 0.98 points higher than XLC’s Alpha and Beta.

FYI: Another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector is by investing in real estate debt. Groundfloor offers fantastic short-term, high-yield bonds that can add diversification to your portfolio!

Performance

Annual Returns

VTV vs. XLC - Annual Returns

YearVTVXLC
20202.23%26.85%
201925.85%31.22%
2018-5.39%0.0%
201717.12%0.0%
201616.88%0.0%
2015-0.89%0.0%
201413.19%0.0%
201333.03%0.0%
201215.19%0.0%
20111.16%0.0%
201014.45%0.0%

VTV had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 33.03%. VTV’s worst year over the past decade yielded -5.39% and occurred in 2018. In most years the Vanguard Value Index Fund ETF Shares provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2010, and 2012 where annual returns amounted to 13.19%, 14.45%, and 15.19% respectively.

The year 2019 was the strongest year for XLC, returning 31.22% on an annual basis. The poorest year for XLC in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of 0.0%. Most years the Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund has given investors modest returns, such as in 2014, 2013, and 2012, when gains were 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

VTV vs. XLC - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
VTV$10,000$12,86512.07%
XLC$10,000$16,64529.04%

A $10,000 investment in VTV would have resulted in a final balance of $12,865. This is a profit of $2,865 over 2 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12.07%.

With a $10,000 investment in XLC, the end total would have been $16,645. This equates to a $6,645 profit over 2 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 29.04%.

VTV’s CAGR is 16.96 percentage points lower than that of XLC and as a result, would have yielded $3,780 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, VTV performed worse than XLC by 16.96% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.