Skip to content

VT vs. IWS: What’s The Difference?

The Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares (VT) and the iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. VT is a Vanguard N/A fund and IWS is a iShares Mid-Cap Value fund. So, what’s the difference between VT and IWS? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of VT is 0.15 percentage points lower than IWS’s (0.08% vs. 0.23%). VT also has a higher exposure to the technology sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, VT has provided lower returns than IWS over the past 11 years.

In this article, we’ll compare VT vs. IWS. We’ll look at industry exposure and performance, as well as at their fund composition and holdings. Moreover, I’ll also discuss VT’s and IWS’s portfolio growth, risk metrics, and annual returns and examine how these affect their overall returns.

TIP: Keep track of all your investments with Personal Capital. I use this amazing tool to aggregate all investments in one place and make sure I'm on track to financial freedom. Oh, and did I mention it's free? Try it out here (link to Personal Capital).

Summary

VTIWS
NameVanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF SharesiShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
CategoryN/AMid-Cap Value
IssuerVanguardiShares
AUM30.44B14.24B
Avg. Return10.42%12.35%
Div. Yield1.65%1.34%
Expense Ratio0.08%0.23%

The Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares (VT) is a N/A fund that is issued by Vanguard. It currently has 30.44B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 10.42% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.65% with an expense ratio of 0.08%.

The iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) is a Mid-Cap Value fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 14.24B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 12.35% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.34% with an expense ratio of 0.23%.

VT’s dividend yield is 0.31% higher than that of IWS (1.65% vs. 1.34%). Also, VT yielded on average 1.93% less per year over the past decade (10.42% vs. 12.35%). The expense ratio of VT is 0.15 percentage points lower than IWS’s (0.08% vs. 0.23%).

FYI: The best way I've found to invest in ETFs is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

VT vs. IWS - Industry Exposure

VTIWS
Technology19.63%11.39%
Industrials10.7%14.6%
Energy3.48%4.71%
Communication Services9.02%4.08%
Utilities2.6%6.97%
Healthcare11.58%8.56%
Consumer Defensive6.71%4.76%
Real Estate3.64%11.71%
Financial Services15.36%15.75%
Consumer Cyclical12.32%12.07%
Basic Materials4.97%5.4%

The Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares (VT) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 19.63%. This is followed by Financial Services and Consumer Cyclical at 15.36% and 12.32% respectively. Energy (3.48%), Real Estate (3.64%), and Basic Materials (4.97%) only make up 12.09% of the fund’s total assets.

VT’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Communication Services, Industrials, Healthcare, and Consumer Cyclical stocks at 6.71%, 9.02%, 10.7%, 11.58%, and 12.32%.

The iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) has the most exposure to the Financial Services sector at 15.75%. This is followed by Industrials and Consumer Cyclical at 14.6% and 12.07% respectively. Energy (4.71%), Consumer Defensive (4.76%), and Basic Materials (5.4%) only make up 14.87% of the fund’s total assets.

IWS’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Utilities, Healthcare, Technology, Real Estate, and Consumer Cyclical stocks at 6.97%, 8.56%, 11.39%, 11.71%, and 12.07%.

VT is 8.24% more exposed to the Technology sector than IWS (19.63% vs 11.39%). VT’s exposure to Financial Services and Consumer Cyclical stocks is 0.39% lower and 0.25% higher respectively (15.36% vs. 15.75% and 12.32% vs. 12.07%). In total, Energy, Real Estate, and Basic Materials also make up 9.73% less of the fund’s holdings compared to IWS (12.09% vs. 21.82%).

Holdings

VT - Holdings

VT HoldingsWeight
Apple Inc2.85%
Microsoft Corp2.71%
Amazon.com Inc1.98%
Facebook Inc Class A1.1%
Alphabet Inc Class A0.97%
Alphabet Inc Class C0.95%
Tesla Inc0.7%
NVIDIA Corp0.64%
JPMorgan Chase & Co0.62%
Tencent Holdings Ltd0.6%

VT’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc Class A, and Alphabet Inc Class A at 2.85%, 2.71%, 1.98%, 1.1%, and 0.97%.

Alphabet Inc Class C (0.95%), Tesla Inc (0.7%), and NVIDIA Corp (0.64%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. JPMorgan Chase & Co and Tencent Holdings Ltd are also represented in the VT’s holdings at 0.62% and 0.6%.

IWS - Holdings

IWS HoldingsWeight
Twitter Inc0.69%
Marvell Technology Inc0.69%
IHS Markit Ltd0.62%
Prudential Financial Inc0.56%
Otis Worldwide Corp Ordinary Shares0.54%
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc0.53%
Xcel Energy Inc0.52%
Motorola Solutions Inc0.52%
Aptiv PLC0.52%
Aflac Inc0.52%

IWS’s Top Holdings are Twitter Inc, Marvell Technology Inc, IHS Markit Ltd, Prudential Financial Inc, and Otis Worldwide Corp Ordinary Shares at 0.69%, 0.69%, 0.62%, 0.56%, and 0.54%.

International Flavors & Fragrances Inc (0.53%), Xcel Energy Inc (0.52%), and Motorola Solutions Inc (0.52%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Aptiv PLC and Aflac Inc are also represented in the IWS’s holdings at 0.52% and 0.52%.

NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).

Risk Analysis

VTIWS
Mean Return0.91.06
R-squared99.3587.04
Std. Deviation14.1916.03
Alpha0.2-4.11
Beta1.011.1
Sharpe Ratio0.710.75
Treynor Ratio9.510.3

The Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares (VT) has a Sharpe Ratio of 0.71 with a Beta of 1.01 and a Mean Return of 0.9. Its Standard Deviation is 14.19 while VT’s Treynor Ratio is 9.5. Furthermore, the fund has a R-squared of 99.35 and a Alpha of 0.2.

The iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) has a R-squared of 87.04 with a Standard Deviation of 16.03 and a Treynor Ratio of 10.3. Its Alpha is -4.11 while IWS’s Mean Return is 1.06. Furthermore, the fund has a Sharpe Ratio of 0.75 and a Beta of 1.1.

VT’s Mean Return is 0.16 points lower than that of IWS and its R-squared is 12.31 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 14.19, VT is slightly less volatile than IWS. The Alpha and Beta of VT are 4.31 points higher and 0.09 points lower than IWS’s Alpha and Beta.

FYI: Another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector is by investing in real estate debt. Groundfloor offers fantastic short-term, high-yield bonds that can add diversification to your portfolio!

Performance

Annual Returns

VT vs. IWS - Annual Returns

YearVTIWS
202016.74%4.76%
201926.8%26.78%
2018-9.67%-12.36%
201724.19%13.1%
20168.77%19.69%
2015-1.88%-4.93%
20143.97%14.49%
201322.98%33.11%
201217.33%18.27%
2011-7.71%-1.55%
201013.05%24.46%

VT had its best year in 2019 with an annual return of 26.8%. VT’s worst year over the past decade yielded -9.67% and occurred in 2018. In most years the Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF Shares provided moderate returns such as in 2016, 2010, and 2020 where annual returns amounted to 8.77%, 13.05%, and 16.74% respectively.

The year 2013 was the strongest year for IWS, returning 33.11% on an annual basis. The poorest year for IWS in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -12.36%. Most years the iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2017, 2014, and 2012, when gains were 13.1%, 14.49%, and 18.27% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

VT vs. IWS - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
VT$10,000$27,73910.42%
IWS$10,000$33,08312.35%

A $10,000 investment in VT would have resulted in a final balance of $27,739. This is a profit of $17,739 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.42%.

With a $10,000 investment in IWS, the end total would have been $33,083. This equates to a $23,083 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12.35%.

VT’s CAGR is 1.93 percentage points lower than that of IWS and as a result, would have yielded $5,344 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, VT performed worse than IWS by 1.93% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *