Skip to content

VOO vs. VV: What’s The Difference?

The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and the Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares (VV) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. VOO is a Vanguard Large Blend fund and VV is a Vanguard Large Blend fund. So, what’s the difference between VOO and VV? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of VOO is 0.01 percentage points lower than VV’s (0.03% vs. 0.04%). VOO also has a lower exposure to the technology sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, VOO has provided lower returns than VV over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare VOO vs. VV. We’ll look at holdings and performance, as well as at their portfolio growth and industry exposure. Moreover, I’ll also discuss VOO’s and VV’s risk metrics, fund composition, and annual returns and examine how these affect their overall returns.

Summary

VOOVV
NameVanguard S&P 500 ETFVanguard Large-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares
CategoryLarge BlendLarge Blend
IssuerVanguardVanguard
AUM753.41B37.65B
Avg. Return14.45%14.75%
Div. Yield1.34%1.26%
Expense Ratio0.03%0.04%

The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by Vanguard. It currently has 753.41B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 14.45% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.34% with an expense ratio of 0.03%.

The Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares (VV) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by Vanguard. It currently has 37.65B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 14.75% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.26% with an expense ratio of 0.04%.

VOO’s dividend yield is 0.08% higher than that of VV (1.34% vs. 1.26%). Also, VOO yielded on average 0.30% less per year over the past decade (14.45% vs. 14.75%). The expense ratio of VOO is 0.01 percentage points lower than VV’s (0.03% vs. 0.04%).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

VOO vs. VV - Industry Exposure

VOOVV
Technology24.24%25.38%
Industrials8.86%8.39%
Energy2.84%2.62%
Communication Services11.14%11.68%
Utilities2.43%2.35%
Healthcare13.1%13.22%
Consumer Defensive6.32%6.06%
Real Estate2.58%2.7%
Financial Services14.2%13.82%
Consumer Cyclical12.01%11.65%
Basic Materials2.27%2.13%

The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 24.24%. This is followed by Financial Services and Healthcare at 14.2% and 13.1% respectively. Utilities (2.43%), Real Estate (2.58%), and Energy (2.84%) only make up 7.85% of the fund’s total assets.

VOO’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Industrials, Communication Services, Consumer Cyclical, and Healthcare stocks at 6.32%, 8.86%, 11.14%, 12.01%, and 13.1%.

The Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares (VV) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 25.38%. This is followed by Financial Services and Healthcare at 13.82% and 13.22% respectively. Utilities (2.35%), Energy (2.62%), and Real Estate (2.7%) only make up 7.67% of the fund’s total assets.

VV’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Industrials, Consumer Cyclical, Communication Services, and Healthcare stocks at 6.06%, 8.39%, 11.65%, 11.68%, and 13.22%.

VOO is 1.14% less exposed to the Technology sector than VV (24.24% vs 25.38%). VOO’s exposure to Financial Services and Healthcare stocks is 0.38% higher and 0.12% lower respectively (14.2% vs. 13.82% and 13.1% vs. 13.22%). In total, Utilities, Real Estate, and Energy also make up 0.18% more of the fund’s holdings compared to VV (7.85% vs. 7.67%).

Holdings

VOO - Holdings

VOO HoldingsWeight
Apple Inc5.92%
Microsoft Corp5.62%
Amazon.com Inc4.06%
Facebook Inc Class A2.29%
Alphabet Inc Class A2.02%
Alphabet Inc Class C1.97%
Tesla Inc1.44%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B1.44%
NVIDIA Corp1.37%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.3%

VOO’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc Class A, and Alphabet Inc Class A at 5.92%, 5.62%, 4.06%, 2.29%, and 2.02%.

Alphabet Inc Class C (1.97%), Tesla Inc (1.44%), and Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B (1.44%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. NVIDIA Corp and JPMorgan Chase & Co are also represented in the VOO’s holdings at 1.37% and 1.3%.

VV - Holdings

VV HoldingsWeight
Apple Inc5.7%
Microsoft Corp5.35%
Amazon.com Inc3.87%
Facebook Inc Class A2.19%
Alphabet Inc Class A1.93%
Alphabet Inc Class C1.81%
Tesla Inc1.37%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B1.3%
NVIDIA Corp1.24%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.24%

VV’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc Class A, and Alphabet Inc Class A at 5.7%, 5.35%, 3.87%, 2.19%, and 1.93%.

Alphabet Inc Class C (1.81%), Tesla Inc (1.37%), and Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B (1.3%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. NVIDIA Corp and JPMorgan Chase & Co are also represented in the VV’s holdings at 1.24% and 1.24%.

Performance

Annual Returns

VOO vs. VV - Annual Returns

YearVOOVV
202018.35%20.99%
201931.46%31.39%
2018-4.42%-4.44%
201721.78%22.03%
201611.93%11.65%
20151.35%1.07%
201413.63%13.39%
201332.33%32.65%
201215.98%16.09%
20112.09%1.58%
20100.0%15.81%

VOO had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 32.33%. VOO’s worst year over the past decade yielded -4.42% and occurred in 2018. In most years the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2016, 2014, and 2012 where annual returns amounted to 11.93%, 13.63%, and 15.98% respectively.

The year 2013 was the strongest year for VV, returning 32.65% on an annual basis. The poorest year for VV in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -4.44%. Most years the Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares has given investors modest returns, such as in 2014, 2010, and 2012, when gains were 13.39%, 15.81%, and 16.09% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

VOO vs. VV - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
VOO$10,000$36,57514.45%
VV$10,000$37,10314.75%

A $10,000 investment in VOO would have resulted in a final balance of $36,575. This is a profit of $26,575 over 10 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.45%.

With a $10,000 investment in VV, the end total would have been $37,103. This equates to a $27,103 profit over 10 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.75%.

VOO’s CAGR is 0.30 percentage points lower than that of VV and as a result, would have yielded $528 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, VOO performed worse than VV by 0.30% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

9125d72911bdc1f2dd2d1918a15aaf4c?s=250&d=mm&r=g

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *