Skip to content

VHT vs. DFAC: What’s The Difference?

The Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares (VHT) and the Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. VHT is a Vanguard Health fund and DFAC is a Dimensional Fund Advisors Large Blend fund. So, what’s the difference between VHT and DFAC? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of VHT is 0.09 percentage points lower than DFAC’s (0.1% vs. 0.19%). VHT also has a higher exposure to the healthcare sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, VHT has provided higher returns than DFAC over the past 11 years.

In this article, we’ll compare VHT vs. DFAC. We’ll look at fund composition and portfolio growth, as well as at their annual returns and performance. Moreover, I’ll also discuss VHT’s and DFAC’s industry exposure, holdings, and risk metrics and examine how these affect their overall returns.

Summary

VHTDFAC
NameVanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF SharesDimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
CategoryHealthLarge Blend
IssuerVanguardDimensional Fund Advisors
AUM17.94B13.53B
Avg. Return16.04%13.93%
Div. Yield1.15%1.0%
Expense Ratio0.1%0.19%

The Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares (VHT) is a Health fund that is issued by Vanguard. It currently has 17.94B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 16.04% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.15% with an expense ratio of 0.1%.

The Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by Dimensional Fund Advisors. It currently has 13.53B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 13.93% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.0% with an expense ratio of 0.19%.

VHT’s dividend yield is 0.15% higher than that of DFAC (1.15% vs. 1.0%). Also, VHT yielded on average 2.11% more per year over the past decade (16.04% vs. 13.93%). The expense ratio of VHT is 0.09 percentage points lower than DFAC’s (0.1% vs. 0.19%).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

VHT vs. DFAC - Industry Exposure

VHTDFAC
Technology0.05%22.81%
Industrials0.05%14.13%
Energy0.0%2.67%
Communication Services0.0%7.63%
Utilities0.0%1.54%
Healthcare99.57%12.09%
Consumer Defensive0.0%5.94%
Real Estate0.0%0.37%
Financial Services0.02%16.17%
Consumer Cyclical0.0%13.09%
Basic Materials0.31%3.56%

The Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares (VHT) has the most exposure to the Healthcare sector at 99.57%. This is followed by Basic Materials and Technology at 0.31% and 0.05% respectively. Real Estate (0.0%), Consumer Defensive (0.0%), and Utilities (0.0%) only make up 0.00% of the fund’s total assets.

VHT’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Communication Services, Energy, Financial Services, Industrials, and Technology stocks at 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.02%, 0.05%, and 0.05%.

The Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 22.81%. This is followed by Financial Services and Industrials at 16.17% and 14.13% respectively. Utilities (1.54%), Energy (2.67%), and Basic Materials (3.56%) only make up 7.77% of the fund’s total assets.

DFAC’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Communication Services, Healthcare, Consumer Cyclical, and Industrials stocks at 5.94%, 7.63%, 12.09%, 13.09%, and 14.13%.

VHT is 87.48% more exposed to the Healthcare sector than DFAC (99.57% vs 12.09%). VHT’s exposure to Basic Materials and Technology stocks is 3.25% lower and 22.76% lower respectively (0.31% vs. 3.56% and 0.05% vs. 22.81%). In total, Real Estate, Consumer Defensive, and Utilities also make up 7.85% less of the fund’s holdings compared to DFAC (0.00% vs. 7.85%).

Holdings

VHT - Holdings

VHT HoldingsWeight
Johnson & Johnson7.34%
UnitedHealth Group Inc6.44%
Pfizer Inc3.7%
Abbott Laboratories3.48%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc3.37%
AbbVie Inc3.37%
Merck & Co Inc3.33%
Eli Lilly and Co3.17%
Danaher Corp2.91%
Medtronic PLC2.83%

VHT’s Top Holdings are Johnson & Johnson, UnitedHealth Group Inc, Pfizer Inc, Abbott Laboratories, and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc at 7.34%, 6.44%, 3.7%, 3.48%, and 3.37%.

AbbVie Inc (3.37%), Merck & Co Inc (3.33%), and Eli Lilly and Co (3.17%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Danaher Corp and Medtronic PLC are also represented in the VHT’s holdings at 2.91% and 2.83%.

DFAC - Holdings

DFAC HoldingsWeight
Apple Inc4.7%
Microsoft Corp3.81%
Amazon.com Inc2.39%
Johnson & Johnson1.05%
Facebook Inc Class A1.05%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.0%
Alphabet Inc Class C0.85%
Alphabet Inc Class A0.84%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B0.75%
Visa Inc Class A0.74%

DFAC’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Johnson & Johnson, and Facebook Inc Class A at 4.7%, 3.81%, 2.39%, 1.05%, and 1.05%.

JPMorgan Chase & Co (1.0%), Alphabet Inc Class C (0.85%), and Alphabet Inc Class A (0.84%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B and Visa Inc Class A are also represented in the DFAC’s holdings at 0.75% and 0.74%.

Risk Analysis

VHTDFAC
Mean Return1.331.19
R-squared59.8695.1
Std. Deviation13.5815.55
Alpha7.99-2.75
Beta0.751.12
Sharpe Ratio1.130.88
Treynor Ratio20.7411.85

The Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares (VHT) has a Treynor Ratio of 20.74 with a Mean Return of 1.33 and a Alpha of 7.99. Its Beta is 0.75 while VHT’s Standard Deviation is 13.58. Furthermore, the fund has a R-squared of 59.86 and a Sharpe Ratio of 1.13.

The Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) has a Alpha of -2.75 with a Sharpe Ratio of 0.88 and a Mean Return of 1.19. Its Standard Deviation is 15.55 while DFAC’s R-squared is 95.1. Furthermore, the fund has a Treynor Ratio of 11.85 and a Beta of 1.12.

VHT’s Mean Return is 0.14 points higher than that of DFAC and its R-squared is 35.24 points lower. With a Standard Deviation of 13.58, VHT is slightly less volatile than DFAC. The Alpha and Beta of VHT are 10.74 points higher and 0.37 points lower than DFAC’s Alpha and Beta.

Performance

Annual Returns

VHT vs. DFAC - Annual Returns

YearVHTDFAC
202018.21%15.8%
201921.97%29.54%
20185.55%-9.43%
201723.34%18.82%
2016-3.33%16.31%
20157.22%-2.53%
201425.38%9.56%
201342.67%37.55%
201219.1%17.93%
201110.57%-1.96%
20105.75%21.67%

VHT had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 42.67%. VHT’s worst year over the past decade yielded -3.33% and occurred in 2016. In most years the Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares provided moderate returns such as in 2011, 2020, and 2012 where annual returns amounted to 10.57%, 18.21%, and 19.1% respectively.

The year 2013 was the strongest year for DFAC, returning 37.55% on an annual basis. The poorest year for DFAC in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -9.43%. Most years the Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2020, 2016, and 2012, when gains were 15.8%, 16.31%, and 17.93% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

VHT vs. DFAC - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
VHT$10,000$48,46416.04%
DFAC$10,000$38,79613.93%

A $10,000 investment in VHT would have resulted in a final balance of $48,464. This is a profit of $38,464 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 16.04%.

With a $10,000 investment in DFAC, the end total would have been $38,796. This equates to a $28,796 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.93%.

VHT’s CAGR is 2.11 percentage points higher than that of DFAC and as a result, would have yielded $9,668 more on a $10,000 investment. Thus, VHT outperformed DFAC by 2.11% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Marvin Allen

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *