Skip to content

VEA vs. IWF: What’s The Difference?

The Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets Index Fund ETF Shares (VEA) and the iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. VEA is a Vanguard Foreign Large Blend fund and IWF is a iShares Large Growth fund. So, what’s the difference between VEA and IWF? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of VEA is 0.14 percentage points lower than IWF’s (0.05% vs. 0.19%). VEA also has a higher exposure to the financial services sector and a higher standard deviation. Overall, VEA has provided lower returns than IWF over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare VEA vs. IWF. We’ll look at performance and annual returns, as well as at their portfolio growth and fund composition. Moreover, I’ll also discuss VEA’s and IWF’s industry exposure, holdings, and risk metrics and examine how these affect their overall returns.

Summary

VEAIWF
NameVanguard FTSE Developed Markets Index Fund ETF SharesiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
CategoryForeign Large BlendLarge Growth
IssuerVanguardiShares
AUM157.48B72.16B
Avg. Return7.05%17.72%
Div. Yield2.49%0.52%
Expense Ratio0.05%0.19%

The Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets Index Fund ETF Shares (VEA) is a Foreign Large Blend fund that is issued by Vanguard. It currently has 157.48B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 7.05% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 2.49% with an expense ratio of 0.05%.

The iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) is a Large Growth fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 72.16B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 17.72% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.52% with an expense ratio of 0.19%.

VEA’s dividend yield is 1.97% higher than that of IWF (2.49% vs. 0.52%). Also, VEA yielded on average 10.67% less per year over the past decade (7.05% vs. 17.72%). The expense ratio of VEA is 0.14 percentage points lower than IWF’s (0.05% vs. 0.19%).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

VEA vs. IWF - Industry Exposure

VEAIWF
Technology11.67%39.29%
Industrials15.47%6.19%
Energy4.17%0.28%
Communication Services5.41%12.82%
Utilities3.1%0.03%
Healthcare10.6%9.23%
Consumer Defensive8.61%4.31%
Real Estate4.04%1.85%
Financial Services17.39%7.36%
Consumer Cyclical11.31%17.62%
Basic Materials8.24%1.01%

The Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets Index Fund ETF Shares (VEA) has the most exposure to the Financial Services sector at 17.39%. This is followed by Industrials and Technology at 15.47% and 11.67% respectively. Real Estate (4.04%), Energy (4.17%), and Communication Services (5.41%) only make up 13.62% of the fund’s total assets.

VEA’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Basic Materials, Consumer Defensive, Healthcare, Consumer Cyclical, and Technology stocks at 8.24%, 8.61%, 10.6%, 11.31%, and 11.67%.

The iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 39.29%. This is followed by Consumer Cyclical and Communication Services at 17.62% and 12.82% respectively. Energy (0.28%), Basic Materials (1.01%), and Real Estate (1.85%) only make up 3.14% of the fund’s total assets.

IWF’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Industrials, Financial Services, Healthcare, and Communication Services stocks at 4.31%, 6.19%, 7.36%, 9.23%, and 12.82%.

VEA is 10.03% more exposed to the Financial Services sector than IWF (17.39% vs 7.36%). VEA’s exposure to Industrials and Technology stocks is 9.28% higher and 27.62% lower respectively (15.47% vs. 6.19% and 11.67% vs. 39.29%). In total, Real Estate, Energy, and Communication Services also make up 1.33% less of the fund’s holdings compared to IWF (13.62% vs. 14.95%).

Holdings

VEA - Holdings

VEA HoldingsWeight
Nestle SA1.5%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd1.4%
ASML Holding NV1.16%
Roche Holding AG1.1%
Toyota Motor Corp0.92%
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE0.84%
Novartis AG0.82%
Shopify Inc A0.7%
AstraZeneca PLC0.67%
SAP SE0.66%

VEA’s Top Holdings are Nestle SA, Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, ASML Holding NV, Roche Holding AG, and Toyota Motor Corp at 1.5%, 1.4%, 1.16%, 1.1%, and 0.92%.

LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE (0.84%), Novartis AG (0.82%), and Shopify Inc A (0.7%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. AstraZeneca PLC and SAP SE are also represented in the VEA’s holdings at 0.67% and 0.66%.

IWF - Holdings

IWF HoldingsWeight
Apple Inc10.51%
Microsoft Corp9.85%
Amazon.com Inc6.63%
Facebook Inc Class A3.91%
Alphabet Inc Class A3.2%
Alphabet Inc Class C3.03%
Tesla Inc2.45%
NVIDIA Corp2.14%
Visa Inc Class A1.91%
The Home Depot Inc1.62%

IWF’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc Class A, and Alphabet Inc Class A at 10.51%, 9.85%, 6.63%, 3.91%, and 3.2%.

Alphabet Inc Class C (3.03%), Tesla Inc (2.45%), and NVIDIA Corp (2.14%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Visa Inc Class A and The Home Depot Inc are also represented in the IWF’s holdings at 1.91% and 1.62%.

Performance

Annual Returns

VEA vs. IWF - Annual Returns

YearVEAIWF
202010.29%38.21%
201922.08%36.08%
2018-14.47%-1.68%
201726.44%29.96%
20162.51%6.92%
2015-0.21%5.48%
2014-5.71%12.84%
201322.12%33.19%
201218.6%15.03%
2011-12.57%2.47%
20108.47%16.47%

VEA had its best year in 2017 with an annual return of 26.44%. VEA’s worst year over the past decade yielded -14.47% and occurred in 2018. In most years the Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets Index Fund ETF Shares provided moderate returns such as in 2016, 2010, and 2020 where annual returns amounted to 2.51%, 8.47%, and 10.29% respectively.

The year 2020 was the strongest year for IWF, returning 38.21% on an annual basis. The poorest year for IWF in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -1.68%. Most years the iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2014, 2012, and 2010, when gains were 12.84%, 15.03%, and 16.47% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

VEA vs. IWF - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
VEA$10,000$19,2907.05%
IWF$10,000$55,92017.72%

A $10,000 investment in VEA would have resulted in a final balance of $19,290. This is a profit of $9,290 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.05%.

With a $10,000 investment in IWF, the end total would have been $55,920. This equates to a $45,920 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17.72%.

VEA’s CAGR is 10.67 percentage points lower than that of IWF and as a result, would have yielded $36,630 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, VEA performed worse than IWF by 10.67% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Marvin Allen

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *