Skip to content

VB vs. XLC: What’s The Difference?

The Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares (VB) and the Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. VB is a Vanguard Small Blend fund and XLC is a SPDR State Street Global Advisors Communications fund. So, what’s the difference between VB and XLC? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of VB is 0.07 percentage points lower than XLC’s (0.05% vs. 0.12%). VB also has a higher exposure to the technology sector and a higher standard deviation. Overall, VB has provided lower returns than XLC over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare VB vs. XLC. We’ll look at annual returns and portfolio growth, as well as at their fund composition and risk metrics. Moreover, I’ll also discuss VB’s and XLC’s holdings, performance, and industry exposure and examine how these affect their overall returns.

FYI: Another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector is by investing in real estate debt. Groundfloor offers fantastic short-term, high-yield bonds that can add diversification to your portfolio!

Summary

VBXLC
NameVanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF SharesCommunication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
CategorySmall BlendCommunications
IssuerVanguardSPDR State Street Global Advisors
AUM137.72B14.09B
Avg. Return14.25%29.04%
Div. Yield1.14%0.62%
Expense Ratio0.05%0.12%

The Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares (VB) is a Small Blend fund that is issued by Vanguard. It currently has 137.72B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 14.25% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.14% with an expense ratio of 0.05%.

The Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) is a Communications fund that is issued by SPDR State Street Global Advisors. It currently has 14.09B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 29.04% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.62% with an expense ratio of 0.12%.

VB’s dividend yield is 0.52% higher than that of XLC (1.14% vs. 0.62%). Also, VB yielded on average 14.78% less per year over the past decade (14.25% vs. 29.04%). The expense ratio of VB is 0.07 percentage points lower than XLC’s (0.05% vs. 0.12%).

FYI: The best way I've found to invest is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit and 100$! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

VB vs. XLC - Industry Exposure

VBXLC
Technology16.85%0.0%
Industrials16.11%0.0%
Energy3.67%0.0%
Communication Services2.4%100.0%
Utilities2.19%0.0%
Healthcare14.34%0.0%
Consumer Defensive4.14%0.0%
Real Estate9.56%0.0%
Financial Services13.06%0.0%
Consumer Cyclical13.03%0.0%
Basic Materials4.63%0.0%

The Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares (VB) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 16.85%. This is followed by Industrials and Healthcare at 16.11% and 14.34% respectively. Communication Services (2.4%), Energy (3.67%), and Consumer Defensive (4.14%) only make up 10.21% of the fund’s total assets.

VB’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Basic Materials, Real Estate, Consumer Cyclical, Financial Services, and Healthcare stocks at 4.63%, 9.56%, 13.03%, 13.06%, and 14.34%.

The Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) has the most exposure to the Communication Services sector at 100.0%. This is followed by Technology and Industrials at 0.0% and 0.0% respectively. Consumer Cyclical (0.0%), Financial Services (0.0%), and Real Estate (0.0%) only make up 0.00% of the fund’s total assets.

XLC’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Healthcare, Utilities, Energy, and Industrials stocks at 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0%.

VB is 16.85% more exposed to the Technology sector than XLC (16.85% vs 0.0%). VB’s exposure to Industrials and Healthcare stocks is 16.11% higher and 14.34% higher respectively (16.11% vs. 0.0% and 14.34% vs. 0.0%). In total, Communication Services, Energy, and Consumer Defensive also make up 89.79% less of the fund’s holdings compared to XLC (10.21% vs. 100.00%).

Holdings

VB - Holdings

VB HoldingsWeight
Charles River Laboratories International Inc0.34%
Pool Corp0.32%
Bio-Techne Corp0.32%
Avantor Inc0.32%
PerkinElmer Inc0.31%
Diamondback Energy Inc0.31%
VICI Properties Inc Ordinary Shares0.3%
IDEX Corp0.3%
Entegris Inc0.3%
Novavax Inc0.29%

VB’s Top Holdings are Charles River Laboratories International Inc, Pool Corp, Bio-Techne Corp, Avantor Inc, and PerkinElmer Inc at 0.34%, 0.32%, 0.32%, 0.32%, and 0.31%.

Diamondback Energy Inc (0.31%), VICI Properties Inc Ordinary Shares (0.3%), and IDEX Corp (0.3%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Entegris Inc and Novavax Inc are also represented in the VB’s holdings at 0.3% and 0.29%.

XLC - Holdings

XLC HoldingsWeight
Facebook Inc A23.75%
Alphabet Inc A11.49%
Alphabet Inc Class C11.16%
Netflix Inc4.78%
Charter Communications Inc A4.65%
Comcast Corp Class A4.44%
T-Mobile US Inc4.41%
The Walt Disney Co4.39%
AT&T Inc4.35%
Verizon Communications Inc4.33%

XLC’s Top Holdings are Facebook Inc A, Alphabet Inc A, Alphabet Inc Class C, Netflix Inc, and Charter Communications Inc A at 23.75%, 11.49%, 11.16%, 4.78%, and 4.65%.

Comcast Corp Class A (4.44%), T-Mobile US Inc (4.41%), and The Walt Disney Co (4.39%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. AT&T Inc and Verizon Communications Inc are also represented in the XLC’s holdings at 4.35% and 4.33%.

TIP: Keep track of all your investments with Personal Capital. I use this amazing tool to aggregate all investments in one place and make sure I'm on track to financial freedom. Oh, and did I mention it's free? Try it out here (link to Empower Personal Capital).

Risk Analysis

VBXLC
Mean Return1.150
R-squared85.030
Std. Deviation17.820
Alpha-4.020
Beta1.210
Sharpe Ratio0.740
Treynor Ratio10.150

The Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares (VB) has a R-squared of 85.03 with a Standard Deviation of 17.82 and a Beta of 1.21. Its Treynor Ratio is 10.15 while VB’s Sharpe Ratio is 0.74. Furthermore, the fund has a Mean Return of 1.15 and a Alpha of -4.02.

The Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) has a Mean Return of 0 with a Beta of 0 and a Sharpe Ratio of 0. Its Alpha is 0 while XLC’s Treynor Ratio is 0. Furthermore, the fund has a Standard Deviation of 0 and a R-squared of 0.

VB’s Mean Return is 1.15 points higher than that of XLC and its R-squared is 85.03 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 17.82, VB is slightly more volatile than XLC. The Alpha and Beta of VB are 4.02 points lower and 1.21 points higher than XLC’s Alpha and Beta.

NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).

Performance

Annual Returns

VB vs. XLC - Annual Returns

YearVBXLC
202019.08%26.85%
201927.37%31.22%
2018-9.3%0.0%
201716.24%0.0%
201618.31%0.0%
2015-3.65%0.0%
20147.51%0.0%
201337.8%0.0%
201218.22%0.0%
2011-2.68%0.0%
201027.89%0.0%

VB had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 37.8%. VB’s worst year over the past decade yielded -9.3% and occurred in 2018. In most years the Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares provided moderate returns such as in 2017, 2012, and 2016 where annual returns amounted to 16.24%, 18.22%, and 18.31% respectively.

The year 2019 was the strongest year for XLC, returning 31.22% on an annual basis. The poorest year for XLC in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of 0.0%. Most years the Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund has given investors modest returns, such as in 2014, 2013, and 2012, when gains were 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

VB vs. XLC - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
VB$10,000$15,16714.25%
XLC$10,000$16,64529.04%

A $10,000 investment in VB would have resulted in a final balance of $15,167. This is a profit of $5,167 over 2 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.25%.

With a $10,000 investment in XLC, the end total would have been $16,645. This equates to a $6,645 profit over 2 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 29.04%.

VB’s CAGR is 14.78 percentage points lower than that of XLC and as a result, would have yielded $1,478 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, VB performed worse than XLC by 14.78% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

9125d72911bdc1f2dd2d1918a15aaf4c?s=250&d=mm&r=g

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *