Skip to content

VB vs. EMB: What’s The Difference?

The Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares (VB) and the iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. VB is a Vanguard Small Blend fund and EMB is a iShares Emerging Markets Bond fund. So, what’s the difference between VB and EMB? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of VB is 0.34 percentage points lower than EMB’s (0.05% vs. 0.39%). VB also has a high exposure to the technology sector while EMB is mostly comprised of BBB bonds. Overall, VB has provided higher returns than EMB over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare VB vs. EMB. We’ll look at holdings and risk metrics, as well as at their industry exposure and annual returns. Moreover, I’ll also discuss VB’s and EMB’s performance, portfolio growth, and fund composition and examine how these affect their overall returns.

FYI: Another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector is by investing in real estate debt. Groundfloor offers fantastic short-term, high-yield bonds that can add diversification to your portfolio!

Summary

VBEMB
NameVanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF SharesiShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
CategorySmall BlendEmerging Markets Bond
IssuerVanguardiShares
AUM137.72B19.76B
Avg. Return14.25%6.43%
Div. Yield1.14%3.85%
Expense Ratio0.05%0.39%

The Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares (VB) is a Small Blend fund that is issued by Vanguard. It currently has 137.72B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 14.25% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.14% with an expense ratio of 0.05%.

The iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) is a Emerging Markets Bond fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 19.76B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 6.43% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 3.85% with an expense ratio of 0.39%.

VB’s dividend yield is 2.71% lower than that of EMB (1.14% vs. 3.85%). Also, VB yielded on average 7.82% more per year over the past decade (14.25% vs. 6.43%). The expense ratio of VB is 0.34 percentage points lower than EMB’s (0.05% vs. 0.39%).

FYI: The best way I've found to invest is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit and 100$! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).

Fund Composition

Holdings

VB - Holdings

VB HoldingsWeight
Charles River Laboratories International Inc0.34%
Pool Corp0.32%
Bio-Techne Corp0.32%
Avantor Inc0.32%
PerkinElmer Inc0.31%
Diamondback Energy Inc0.31%
VICI Properties Inc Ordinary Shares0.3%
IDEX Corp0.3%
Entegris Inc0.3%
Novavax Inc0.29%

VB’s Top Holdings are Charles River Laboratories International Inc, Pool Corp, Bio-Techne Corp, Avantor Inc, and PerkinElmer Inc at 0.34%, 0.32%, 0.32%, 0.32%, and 0.31%.

Diamondback Energy Inc (0.31%), VICI Properties Inc Ordinary Shares (0.3%), and IDEX Corp (0.3%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Entegris Inc and Novavax Inc are also represented in the VB’s holdings at 0.3% and 0.29%.

EMB - Holdings

EMB Bond SectorsWeight
BBB33.79%
B21.97%
BB16.92%
A13.67%
AA7.97%
Below B4.49%
Others1.11%
AAA0.09%
US Government0.0%

EMB’s Top Bond Sectors are ratings of BBB, B, BB, A, and AA at 33.79%, 21.97%, 16.92%, 13.67%, and 7.97%. The fund is less weighted towards Below B (4.49%), Others (1.11%), and AAA (0.09%) rated bonds.

TIP: Keep track of all your investments with Personal Capital. I use this amazing tool to aggregate all investments in one place and make sure I'm on track to financial freedom. Oh, and did I mention it's free? Try it out here (link to Empower Personal Capital).

Risk Analysis

VBEMB
Mean Return1.150.44
R-squared85.0323.34
Std. Deviation17.828.44
Alpha-4.020.89
Beta1.211.36
Sharpe Ratio0.740.55
Treynor Ratio10.153.24

The Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares (VB) has a Standard Deviation of 17.82 with a Mean Return of 1.15 and a R-squared of 85.03. Its Treynor Ratio is 10.15 while VB’s Alpha is -4.02. Furthermore, the fund has a Beta of 1.21 and a Sharpe Ratio of 0.74.

The iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) has a Standard Deviation of 8.44 with a Treynor Ratio of 3.24 and a Mean Return of 0.44. Its Sharpe Ratio is 0.55 while EMB’s R-squared is 23.34. Furthermore, the fund has a Beta of 1.36 and a Alpha of 0.89.

VB’s Mean Return is 0.71 points higher than that of EMB and its R-squared is 61.69 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 17.82, VB is slightly more volatile than EMB. The Alpha and Beta of VB are 4.91 points lower and 0.15 points lower than EMB’s Alpha and Beta.

NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).

Performance

Annual Returns

VB vs. EMB - Annual Returns

YearVBEMB
202019.08%5.48%
201927.37%15.57%
2018-9.3%-5.67%
201716.24%9.98%
201618.31%9.41%
2015-3.65%0.43%
20147.51%6.69%
201337.8%-7.42%
201218.22%17.64%
2011-2.68%7.2%
201027.89%11.47%

VB had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 37.8%. VB’s worst year over the past decade yielded -9.3% and occurred in 2018. In most years the Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares provided moderate returns such as in 2017, 2012, and 2016 where annual returns amounted to 16.24%, 18.22%, and 18.31% respectively.

The year 2012 was the strongest year for EMB, returning 17.64% on an annual basis. The poorest year for EMB in the last ten years was 2013, with a yield of -7.42%. Most years the iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2014, 2011, and 2016, when gains were 6.69%, 7.2%, and 9.41% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

VB vs. EMB - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
VB$10,000$39,73414.25%
EMB$10,000$19,2956.43%

A $10,000 investment in VB would have resulted in a final balance of $39,734. This is a profit of $29,734 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.25%.

With a $10,000 investment in EMB, the end total would have been $19,295. This equates to a $9,295 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.43%.

VB’s CAGR is 7.82 percentage points higher than that of EMB and as a result, would have yielded $20,439 more on a $10,000 investment. Thus, VB outperformed EMB by 7.82% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

9125d72911bdc1f2dd2d1918a15aaf4c?s=250&d=mm&r=g

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *