Skip to content

TIP vs. SCHG: What’s The Difference?

The iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) and the Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. TIP is a iShares Inflation-Protected Bond fund and SCHG is a Schwab ETFs Large Growth fund. So, what’s the difference between TIP and SCHG? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of TIP is 0.15 percentage points higher than SCHG’s (0.19% vs. 0.04%). TIP is mostly comprised of AAA bonds while SCHG has a high exposure to the technology sector. Overall, TIP has provided lower returns than SCHG over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare TIP vs. SCHG. We’ll look at portfolio growth and performance, as well as at their annual returns and holdings. Moreover, I’ll also discuss TIP’s and SCHG’s risk metrics, industry exposure, and fund composition and examine how these affect their overall returns.

FYI: Another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector is by investing in real estate debt. Groundfloor offers fantastic short-term, high-yield bonds that can add diversification to your portfolio!

Summary

TIPSCHG
NameiShares TIPS Bond ETFSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
CategoryInflation-Protected BondLarge Growth
IssueriSharesSchwab ETFs
AUM28.3B15.16B
Avg. Return4.07%17.81%
Div. Yield1.87%0.43%
Expense Ratio0.19%0.04%

The iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) is a Inflation-Protected Bond fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 28.3B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 4.07% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.87% with an expense ratio of 0.19%.

The Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is a Large Growth fund that is issued by Schwab ETFs. It currently has 15.16B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 17.81% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.43% with an expense ratio of 0.04%.

TIP’s dividend yield is 1.44% higher than that of SCHG (1.87% vs. 0.43%). Also, TIP yielded on average 13.74% less per year over the past decade (4.07% vs. 17.81%). The expense ratio of TIP is 0.15 percentage points higher than SCHG’s (0.19% vs. 0.04%).

FYI: The best way I've found to invest is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit and 100$! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).

Fund Composition

Holdings

TIP - Holdings

TIP Bond SectorsWeight
AAA99.31%
Others0.69%
Below B0.0%
B0.0%
BB0.0%
BBB0.0%
A0.0%
AA0.0%
US Government0.0%

TIP’s Top Bond Sectors are ratings of AAA, Others, Below B, B, and BB at 99.31%, 0.69%, 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0%. The fund is less weighted towards BBB (0.0%), A (0.0%), and AA (0.0%) rated bonds.

SCHG - Holdings

SCHG HoldingsWeight
Apple Inc11.49%
Microsoft Corp10.91%
Amazon.com Inc7.89%
Facebook Inc A4.45%
Alphabet Inc A3.93%
Alphabet Inc Class C3.82%
Tesla Inc2.8%
NVIDIA Corp2.67%
Visa Inc Class A2.12%
UnitedHealth Group Inc2.02%

SCHG’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc A, and Alphabet Inc A at 11.49%, 10.91%, 7.89%, 4.45%, and 3.93%.

Alphabet Inc Class C (3.82%), Tesla Inc (2.8%), and NVIDIA Corp (2.67%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Visa Inc Class A and UnitedHealth Group Inc are also represented in the SCHG’s holdings at 2.12% and 2.02%.

TIP: Keep track of all your investments with Personal Capital. I use this amazing tool to aggregate all investments in one place and make sure I'm on track to financial freedom. Oh, and did I mention it's free? Try it out here (link to Empower Personal Capital).

Risk Analysis

TIPSCHG
Mean Return0.281.46
R-squared66.5792.92
Std. Deviation4.3314.78
Alpha-0.581.97
Beta1.181.05
Sharpe Ratio0.621.14
Treynor Ratio2.2416.3

The iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) has a Alpha of -0.58 with a R-squared of 66.57 and a Mean Return of 0.28. Its Beta is 1.18 while TIP’s Standard Deviation is 4.33. Furthermore, the fund has a Treynor Ratio of 2.24 and a Sharpe Ratio of 0.62.

The Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a Alpha of 1.97 with a Standard Deviation of 14.78 and a Beta of 1.05. Its Mean Return is 1.46 while SCHG’s R-squared is 92.92. Furthermore, the fund has a Treynor Ratio of 16.3 and a Sharpe Ratio of 1.14.

TIP’s Mean Return is 1.18 points lower than that of SCHG and its R-squared is 26.35 points lower. With a Standard Deviation of 4.33, TIP is slightly less volatile than SCHG. The Alpha and Beta of TIP are 2.55 points lower and 0.13 points higher than SCHG’s Alpha and Beta.

NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).

Performance

Annual Returns

TIP vs. SCHG - Annual Returns

YearTIPSCHG
202010.91%39.13%
20198.28%36.21%
2018-1.43%-1.35%
20172.92%28.04%
20164.56%6.76%
2015-1.59%3.26%
20143.49%15.74%
2013-8.65%33.96%
20126.8%17.02%
201113.4%-0.67%
20106.1%16.83%

TIP had its best year in 2011 with an annual return of 13.4%. TIP’s worst year over the past decade yielded -8.65% and occurred in 2013. In most years the iShares TIPS Bond ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2016, and 2010 where annual returns amounted to 3.49%, 4.56%, and 6.1% respectively.

The year 2020 was the strongest year for SCHG, returning 39.13% on an annual basis. The poorest year for SCHG in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -1.35%. Most years the Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2014, 2010, and 2012, when gains were 15.74%, 16.83%, and 17.02% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

TIP vs. SCHG - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
TIP$10,000$14,3534.07%
SCHG$10,000$47,55617.81%

A $10,000 investment in TIP would have resulted in a final balance of $14,353. This is a profit of $4,353 over 10 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.07%.

With a $10,000 investment in SCHG, the end total would have been $47,556. This equates to a $37,556 profit over 10 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17.81%.

TIP’s CAGR is 13.74 percentage points lower than that of SCHG and as a result, would have yielded $33,203 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, TIP performed worse than SCHG by 13.74% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

9125d72911bdc1f2dd2d1918a15aaf4c?s=250&d=mm&r=g

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *