Skip to content

TIP vs. IXUS: What’s The Difference?

The iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) and the iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. TIP is a iShares Inflation-Protected Bond fund and IXUS is a iShares Foreign Large Blend fund. So, what’s the difference between TIP and IXUS? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of TIP is 0.10 percentage points higher than IXUS’s (0.19% vs. 0.09%). TIP is mostly comprised of AAA bonds while IXUS has a high exposure to the financial services sector. Overall, TIP has provided lower returns than IXUS over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare TIP vs. IXUS. We’ll look at risk metrics and performance, as well as at their portfolio growth and fund composition. Moreover, I’ll also discuss TIP’s and IXUS’s annual returns, holdings, and industry exposure and examine how these affect their overall returns.

FYI: Another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector is by investing in real estate debt. Groundfloor offers fantastic short-term, high-yield bonds that can add diversification to your portfolio!

Summary

TIPIXUS
NameiShares TIPS Bond ETFiShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
CategoryInflation-Protected BondForeign Large Blend
IssueriSharesiShares
AUM28.3B29.54B
Avg. Return4.07%6.09%
Div. Yield1.87%2.13%
Expense Ratio0.19%0.09%

The iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) is a Inflation-Protected Bond fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 28.3B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 4.07% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.87% with an expense ratio of 0.19%.

The iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) is a Foreign Large Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 29.54B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 6.09% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 2.13% with an expense ratio of 0.09%.

TIP’s dividend yield is 0.26% lower than that of IXUS (1.87% vs. 2.13%). Also, TIP yielded on average 2.01% less per year over the past decade (4.07% vs. 6.09%). The expense ratio of TIP is 0.10 percentage points higher than IXUS’s (0.19% vs. 0.09%).

FYI: The best way I've found to invest is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit and 100$! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).

Fund Composition

Holdings

TIP - Holdings

TIP Bond SectorsWeight
AAA99.31%
Others0.69%
Below B0.0%
B0.0%
BB0.0%
BBB0.0%
A0.0%
AA0.0%
US Government0.0%

TIP’s Top Bond Sectors are ratings of AAA, Others, Below B, B, and BB at 99.31%, 0.69%, 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0%. The fund is less weighted towards BBB (0.0%), A (0.0%), and AA (0.0%) rated bonds.

IXUS - Holdings

IXUS HoldingsWeight
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd1.64%
Tencent Holdings Ltd1.35%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares1.34%
Nestle SA1.1%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd1.06%
ASML Holding NV0.9%
Roche Holding AG0.81%
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE0.67%
Novartis AG0.62%
Toyota Motor Corp0.59%

IXUS’s Top Holdings are Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd, Tencent Holdings Ltd, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares, Nestle SA, and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd at 1.64%, 1.35%, 1.34%, 1.1%, and 1.06%.

ASML Holding NV (0.9%), Roche Holding AG (0.81%), and LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE (0.67%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Novartis AG and Toyota Motor Corp are also represented in the IXUS’s holdings at 0.62% and 0.59%.

TIP: Keep track of all your investments with Personal Capital. I use this amazing tool to aggregate all investments in one place and make sure I'm on track to financial freedom. Oh, and did I mention it's free? Try it out here (link to Empower Personal Capital).

Risk Analysis

TIPIXUS
Mean Return0.280
R-squared66.570
Std. Deviation4.330
Alpha-0.580
Beta1.180
Sharpe Ratio0.620
Treynor Ratio2.240

The iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) has a Alpha of -0.58 with a Beta of 1.18 and a Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. Its Mean Return is 0.28 while TIP’s R-squared is 66.57. Furthermore, the fund has a Treynor Ratio of 2.24 and a Standard Deviation of 4.33.

The iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) has a Standard Deviation of 0 with a Beta of 0 and a Alpha of 0. Its Treynor Ratio is 0 while IXUS’s R-squared is 0. Furthermore, the fund has a Sharpe Ratio of 0 and a Mean Return of 0.

TIP’s Mean Return is 0.28 points higher than that of IXUS and its R-squared is 66.57 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 4.33, TIP is slightly more volatile than IXUS. The Alpha and Beta of TIP are 0.58 points lower and 1.18 points higher than IXUS’s Alpha and Beta.

NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).

Performance

Annual Returns

TIP vs. IXUS - Annual Returns

YearTIPIXUS
202010.91%11.14%
20198.28%21.85%
2018-1.43%-14.55%
20172.92%28.08%
20164.56%4.66%
2015-1.59%-4.62%
20143.49%-3.96%
2013-8.65%15.85%
20126.8%0.0%
201113.4%0.0%
20106.1%0.0%

TIP had its best year in 2011 with an annual return of 13.4%. TIP’s worst year over the past decade yielded -8.65% and occurred in 2013. In most years the iShares TIPS Bond ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2016, and 2010 where annual returns amounted to 3.49%, 4.56%, and 6.1% respectively.

The year 2017 was the strongest year for IXUS, returning 28.08% on an annual basis. The poorest year for IXUS in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -14.55%. Most years the iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2011, 2010, and 2016, when gains were 0.0%, 0.0%, and 4.66% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

TIP vs. IXUS - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
TIP$10,000$12,9734.07%
IXUS$10,000$14,2096.09%

A $10,000 investment in TIP would have resulted in a final balance of $12,973. This is a profit of $2,973 over 7 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.07%.

With a $10,000 investment in IXUS, the end total would have been $14,209. This equates to a $4,209 profit over 7 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.09%.

TIP’s CAGR is 2.01 percentage points lower than that of IXUS and as a result, would have yielded $1,236 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, TIP performed worse than IXUS by 2.01% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

9125d72911bdc1f2dd2d1918a15aaf4c?s=250&d=mm&r=g

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *