The iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) and the iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. SHY is a iShares Short Government fund and ACWI is a iShares N/A fund. So, what’s the difference between SHY and ACWI? And which fund is better?
The expense ratio of SHY is 0.17 percentage points lower than ACWI’s (0.15% vs. 0.32%). SHY is mostly comprised of AAA bonds while ACWI has a high exposure to the technology sector. Overall, SHY has provided lower returns than ACWI over the past 11 years.
In this article, we’ll compare SHY vs. ACWI. We’ll look at fund composition and risk metrics, as well as at their performance and annual returns. Moreover, I’ll also discuss SHY’s and ACWI’s portfolio growth, holdings, and industry exposure and examine how these affect their overall returns.
|Name||iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF||iShares MSCI ACWI ETF|
The iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) is a Short Government fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 19.51B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 1.27% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.46% with an expense ratio of 0.15%.
The iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) is a N/A fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 16.85B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 10.21% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.39% with an expense ratio of 0.32%.
SHY’s dividend yield is 0.93% lower than that of ACWI (0.46% vs. 1.39%). Also, SHY yielded on average 8.94% less per year over the past decade (1.27% vs. 10.21%). The expense ratio of SHY is 0.17 percentage points lower than ACWI’s (0.15% vs. 0.32%).
|SHY Bond Sectors||Weight|
SHY’s Top Bond Sectors are ratings of AAA, Others, Below B, B, and BB at 99.67%, 0.33%, 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0%. The fund is less weighted towards BBB (0.0%), A (0.0%), and AA (0.0%) rated bonds.
|Facebook Inc A||1.25%|
|Alphabet Inc Class C||1.12%|
|Alphabet Inc A||1.09%|
|Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd||0.79%|
|JPMorgan Chase & Co||0.71%|
ACWI’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc A, and Alphabet Inc Class C at 3.44%, 2.91%, 2.21%, 1.25%, and 1.12%.
Alphabet Inc A (1.09%), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd (0.79%), and Tesla Inc (0.78%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. NVIDIA Corp and JPMorgan Chase & Co are also represented in the ACWI’s holdings at 0.74% and 0.71%.
The iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) has a Sharpe Ratio of 0.54 with a Alpha of -0.03 and a Standard Deviation of 0.89. Its Treynor Ratio is 2.6 while SHY’s Mean Return is 0.09. Furthermore, the fund has a R-squared of 39.11 and a Beta of 0.18.
The iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a Standard Deviation of 14.05 with a Sharpe Ratio of 0.71 and a Mean Return of 0.89. Its Alpha is 0.15 while ACWI’s Beta is 1. Furthermore, the fund has a R-squared of 99.96 and a Treynor Ratio of 9.45.
SHY’s Mean Return is 0.80 points lower than that of ACWI and its R-squared is 60.85 points lower. With a Standard Deviation of 0.89, SHY is slightly less volatile than ACWI. The Alpha and Beta of SHY are 0.18 points lower and 0.82 points lower than ACWI’s Alpha and Beta.
SHY had its best year in 2019 with an annual return of 3.42%. SHY’s worst year over the past decade yielded 0.23% and occurred in 2013. In most years the iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2016, and 2011 where annual returns amounted to 0.48%, 0.75%, and 1.43% respectively.
The year 2019 was the strongest year for ACWI, returning 26.7% on an annual basis. The poorest year for ACWI in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -9.15%. Most years the iShares MSCI ACWI ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2016, 2010, and 2012, when gains were 8.22%, 12.31%, and 15.99% respectively.
|Fund||Initial Balance||Final Balance||CAGR|
A $10,000 investment in SHY would have resulted in a final balance of $11,486. This is a profit of $1,486 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 1.27%.
With a $10,000 investment in ACWI, the end total would have been $27,241. This equates to a $17,241 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.21%.
SHY’s CAGR is 8.94 percentage points lower than that of ACWI and as a result, would have yielded $15,755 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, SHY performed worse than ACWI by 8.94% annually.
Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:
P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!
1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!
2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!
3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).
4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.
5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!
To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.