The Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and the iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. SCHX is a Schwab ETFs Large Blend fund and ACWI is a iShares N/A fund. So, what’s the difference between SCHX and ACWI? And which fund is better?
The expense ratio of SCHX is 0.29 percentage points lower than ACWI’s (0.03% vs. 0.32%). SCHX also has a higher exposure to the technology sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, SCHX has provided higher returns than ACWI over the past ten years.
In this article, we’ll compare SCHX vs. ACWI. We’ll look at performance and risk metrics, as well as at their portfolio growth and annual returns. Moreover, I’ll also discuss SCHX’s and ACWI’s fund composition, industry exposure, and holdings and examine how these affect their overall returns.
|Name||Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF||iShares MSCI ACWI ETF|
The Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by Schwab ETFs. It currently has 30.89B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 14.60% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.41% with an expense ratio of 0.03%.
The iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) is a N/A fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 16.85B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 10.21% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.39% with an expense ratio of 0.32%.
SCHX’s dividend yield is 0.02% higher than that of ACWI (1.41% vs. 1.39%). Also, SCHX yielded on average 4.39% more per year over the past decade (14.60% vs. 10.21%). The expense ratio of SCHX is 0.29 percentage points lower than ACWI’s (0.03% vs. 0.32%).
FYI: The best way I've found to invest in ETFs is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).
The Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 25.13%. This is followed by Financial Services and Healthcare at 13.82% and 13.04% respectively. Utilities (2.37%), Energy (2.72%), and Real Estate (3.13%) only make up 8.22% of the fund’s total assets.
SCHX’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Industrials, Communication Services, Consumer Cyclical, and Healthcare stocks at 5.97%, 8.65%, 11.26%, 11.63%, and 13.04%.
The iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 20.41%. This is followed by Financial Services and Consumer Cyclical at 15.58% and 12.01% respectively. Real Estate (2.75%), Energy (3.48%), and Basic Materials (4.73%) only make up 10.96% of the fund’s total assets.
ACWI’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Industrials, Communication Services, Healthcare, and Consumer Cyclical stocks at 7.15%, 9.65%, 9.87%, 11.74%, and 12.01%.
SCHX is 4.72% more exposed to the Technology sector than ACWI (25.13% vs 20.41%). SCHX’s exposure to Financial Services and Healthcare stocks is 1.76% lower and 1.30% higher respectively (13.82% vs. 15.58% and 13.04% vs. 11.74%). In total, Utilities, Energy, and Real Estate also make up 0.62% less of the fund’s holdings compared to ACWI (8.22% vs. 8.84%).
|Facebook Inc A||2.08%|
|Alphabet Inc A||1.84%|
|Alphabet Inc Class C||1.78%|
|Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B||1.32%|
|JPMorgan Chase & Co||1.18%|
SCHX’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc A, and Alphabet Inc A at 5.37%, 5.1%, 3.69%, 2.08%, and 1.84%.
Alphabet Inc Class C (1.78%), Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B (1.32%), and Tesla Inc (1.31%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. NVIDIA Corp and JPMorgan Chase & Co are also represented in the SCHX’s holdings at 1.25% and 1.18%.
|Facebook Inc A||1.25%|
|Alphabet Inc Class C||1.12%|
|Alphabet Inc A||1.09%|
|Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd||0.79%|
|JPMorgan Chase & Co||0.71%|
ACWI’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc A, and Alphabet Inc Class C at 3.44%, 2.91%, 2.21%, 1.25%, and 1.12%.
Alphabet Inc A (1.09%), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd (0.79%), and Tesla Inc (0.78%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. NVIDIA Corp and JPMorgan Chase & Co are also represented in the ACWI’s holdings at 0.74% and 0.71%.
NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).
The Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a Standard Deviation of 13.8 with a Treynor Ratio of 14.06 and a Mean Return of 1.24. Its Sharpe Ratio is 1.03 while SCHX’s R-squared is 99.83. Furthermore, the fund has a Alpha of -0.14 and a Beta of 1.02.
The iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a Treynor Ratio of 9.45 with a R-squared of 99.96 and a Alpha of 0.15. Its Beta is 1 while ACWI’s Mean Return is 0.89. Furthermore, the fund has a Sharpe Ratio of 0.71 and a Standard Deviation of 14.05.
SCHX’s Mean Return is 0.35 points higher than that of ACWI and its R-squared is 0.13 points lower. With a Standard Deviation of 13.8, SCHX is slightly less volatile than ACWI. The Alpha and Beta of SCHX are 0.29 points lower and 0.02 points higher than ACWI’s Alpha and Beta.
FYI: Another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector is by investing in real estate debt. Groundfloor offers fantastic short-term, high-yield bonds that can add diversification to your portfolio!
SCHX had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 32.54%. SCHX’s worst year over the past decade yielded -4.52% and occurred in 2018. In most years the Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2010, and 2012 where annual returns amounted to 13.33%, 15.88%, and 16.06% respectively.
The year 2019 was the strongest year for ACWI, returning 26.7% on an annual basis. The poorest year for ACWI in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -9.15%. Most years the iShares MSCI ACWI ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2016, 2010, and 2012, when gains were 8.22%, 12.31%, and 15.99% respectively.
|Fund||Initial Balance||Final Balance||CAGR|
A $10,000 investment in SCHX would have resulted in a final balance of $36,987. This is a profit of $26,987 over 10 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.60%.
With a $10,000 investment in ACWI, the end total would have been $24,255. This equates to a $14,255 profit over 10 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.21%.
SCHX’s CAGR is 4.39 percentage points higher than that of ACWI and as a result, would have yielded $12,732 more on a $10,000 investment. Thus, SCHX outperformed ACWI by 4.39% annually.
Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:
P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!
1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!
2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!
3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).
4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.
5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!
To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.