The Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and the Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares (VV) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. SCHF is a Schwab ETFs Foreign Large Blend fund and VV is a Vanguard Large Blend fund. So, what’s the difference between SCHF and VV? And which fund is better?
The expense ratio of SCHF is 0.02 percentage points higher than VV’s (0.06% vs. 0.04%). SCHF also has a higher exposure to the financial services sector and a higher standard deviation. Overall, SCHF has provided lower returns than VV over the past 10 years.
In this article, we’ll compare SCHF vs. VV. We’ll look at holdings and annual returns, as well as at their portfolio growth and performance. Moreover, I’ll also discuss SCHF’s and VV’s risk metrics, fund composition, and industry exposure and examine how these affect their overall returns.
|Name||Schwab International Equity ETF||Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares|
|Category||Foreign Large Blend||Large Blend|
The Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) is a Foreign Large Blend fund that is issued by Schwab ETFs. It currently has 26.99B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 6.43% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 2.16% with an expense ratio of 0.06%.
The Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares (VV) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by Vanguard. It currently has 37.65B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 14.75% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.26% with an expense ratio of 0.04%.
SCHF’s dividend yield is 0.90% higher than that of VV (2.16% vs. 1.26%). Also, SCHF yielded on average 8.32% less per year over the past decade (6.43% vs. 14.75%). The expense ratio of SCHF is 0.02 percentage points higher than VV’s (0.06% vs. 0.04%).
FYI: The best way I've found to invest in ETFs is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).
The Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has the most exposure to the Financial Services sector at 17.85%. This is followed by Industrials and Technology at 14.86% and 11.55% respectively. Real Estate (3.17%), Energy (4.23%), and Communication Services (5.65%) only make up 13.05% of the fund’s total assets.
SCHF’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Basic Materials, Consumer Defensive, Consumer Cyclical, Healthcare, and Technology stocks at 8.26%, 9.41%, 10.87%, 11.05%, and 11.55%.
The Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares (VV) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 25.38%. This is followed by Financial Services and Healthcare at 13.82% and 13.22% respectively. Utilities (2.35%), Energy (2.62%), and Real Estate (2.7%) only make up 7.67% of the fund’s total assets.
VV’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Industrials, Consumer Cyclical, Communication Services, and Healthcare stocks at 6.06%, 8.39%, 11.65%, 11.68%, and 13.22%.
SCHF is 4.03% more exposed to the Financial Services sector than VV (17.85% vs 13.82%). SCHF’s exposure to Industrials and Technology stocks is 6.47% higher and 13.83% lower respectively (14.86% vs. 8.39% and 11.55% vs. 25.38%). In total, Real Estate, Energy, and Communication Services also make up 3.95% less of the fund’s holdings compared to VV (13.05% vs. 17.00%).
|Samsung Electronics Co Ltd||1.6%|
|ASML Holding NV||1.29%|
|Roche Holding AG||1.24%|
|Toyota Motor Corp||1.02%|
|LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE||0.93%|
|Shopify Inc A||0.78%|
SCHF’s Top Holdings are Nestle SA, Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, ASML Holding NV, Roche Holding AG, and Toyota Motor Corp at 1.66%, 1.6%, 1.29%, 1.24%, and 1.02%.
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE (0.93%), Novartis AG (0.92%), and Shopify Inc A (0.78%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. AstraZeneca PLC and SAP SE are also represented in the SCHF’s holdings at 0.75% and 0.74%.
|Facebook Inc Class A||2.19%|
|Alphabet Inc Class A||1.93%|
|Alphabet Inc Class C||1.81%|
|Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B||1.3%|
|JPMorgan Chase & Co||1.24%|
VV’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc Class A, and Alphabet Inc Class A at 5.7%, 5.35%, 3.87%, 2.19%, and 1.93%.
Alphabet Inc Class C (1.81%), Tesla Inc (1.37%), and Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B (1.3%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. NVIDIA Corp and JPMorgan Chase & Co are also represented in the VV’s holdings at 1.24% and 1.24%.
NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).
The Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a Alpha of 0.53 with a R-squared of 98.16 and a Treynor Ratio of 5.39. Its Mean Return is 0.58 while SCHF’s Beta is 0.99. Furthermore, the fund has a Sharpe Ratio of 0.42 and a Standard Deviation of 15.08.
The Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares (VV) has a Mean Return of 1.24 with a Sharpe Ratio of 1.04 and a Alpha of -0.08. Its Treynor Ratio is 14.14 while VV’s Beta is 1.01. Furthermore, the fund has a Standard Deviation of 13.75 and a R-squared of 99.86.
SCHF’s Mean Return is 0.66 points lower than that of VV and its R-squared is 1.70 points lower. With a Standard Deviation of 15.08, SCHF is slightly more volatile than VV. The Alpha and Beta of SCHF are 0.61 points higher and 0.02 points lower than VV’s Alpha and Beta.
BTW: Uncorrelated crypto assets such as Bitcoin can serve as a hedge and mitigate risk. I've allocated around 5% of my portfolio to crypto assets through Coinbase - the simplest and cheapest broker I've found! Click here to read more (link to Coinbase).
SCHF had its best year in 2017 with an annual return of 25.83%. SCHF’s worst year over the past decade yielded -14.39% and occurred in 2018. In most years the Schwab International Equity ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2016, 2010, and 2020 where annual returns amounted to 2.88%, 8.6%, and 9.86% respectively.
The year 2013 was the strongest year for VV, returning 32.65% on an annual basis. The poorest year for VV in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -4.44%. Most years the Vanguard Large-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares has given investors modest returns, such as in 2014, 2010, and 2012, when gains were 13.39%, 15.81%, and 16.09% respectively.
|Fund||Initial Balance||Final Balance||CAGR|
A $10,000 investment in SCHF would have resulted in a final balance of $17,089. This is a profit of $7,089 over 10 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.43%.
With a $10,000 investment in VV, the end total would have been $37,103. This equates to a $27,103 profit over 10 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.75%.
SCHF’s CAGR is 8.32 percentage points lower than that of VV and as a result, would have yielded $20,014 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, SCHF performed worse than VV by 8.32% annually.
Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:
P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!
1) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!
2) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).
3) If you are interested in crypto, check out Coinbase. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to the growing crypto space and Coinbase has just been a breeze to use. Once you register, make sure to also open an Coinbase Pro account to buy crypto at the lowest fees on the market (just 0.1%!).
To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.