Skip to content

RSP vs. USMV: What’s The Difference?

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and the iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. RSP is a Invesco Large Blend fund and USMV is a iShares Large Blend fund. So, what’s the difference between RSP and USMV? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of RSP is 0.05 percentage points higher than USMV’s (0.2% vs. 0.15%). RSP also has a lower exposure to the technology sector and a higher standard deviation. Overall, RSP has provided lower returns than USMV over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare RSP vs. USMV. We’ll look at portfolio growth and holdings, as well as at their fund composition and risk metrics. Moreover, I’ll also discuss RSP’s and USMV’s performance, annual returns, and industry exposure and examine how these affect their overall returns.

TIP: Keep track of all your investments with Personal Capital. I use this amazing tool to aggregate all investments in one place and make sure I'm on track to financial freedom. Oh, and did I mention it's free? Try it out here (link to Personal Capital).

Summary

RSPUSMV
NameInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETFiShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
CategoryLarge BlendLarge Blend
IssuerInvescoiShares
AUM28.62B27.6B
Avg. Return13.79%13.89%
Div. Yield1.31%1.5%
Expense Ratio0.2%0.15%

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by Invesco. It currently has 28.62B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 13.79% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.31% with an expense ratio of 0.2%.

The iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 27.6B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 13.89% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.5% with an expense ratio of 0.15%.

RSP’s dividend yield is 0.19% lower than that of USMV (1.31% vs. 1.5%). Also, RSP yielded on average 0.11% less per year over the past decade (13.79% vs. 13.89%). The expense ratio of RSP is 0.05 percentage points higher than USMV’s (0.2% vs. 0.15%).

FYI: The best way I've found to invest in ETFs is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

RSP vs. USMV - Industry Exposure

RSPUSMV
Technology14.73%20.53%
Industrials14.62%10.51%
Energy3.9%0.21%
Communication Services4.31%11.03%
Utilities5.58%6.93%
Healthcare13.69%18.42%
Consumer Defensive6.86%12.82%
Real Estate5.84%2.73%
Financial Services13.43%9.65%
Consumer Cyclical13.01%5.53%
Basic Materials4.04%1.65%

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 14.73%. This is followed by Industrials and Healthcare at 14.62% and 13.69% respectively. Basic Materials (4.04%), Communication Services (4.31%), and Utilities (5.58%) only make up 13.93% of the fund’s total assets.

RSP’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Real Estate, Consumer Defensive, Consumer Cyclical, Financial Services, and Healthcare stocks at 5.84%, 6.86%, 13.01%, 13.43%, and 13.69%.

The iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 20.53%. This is followed by Healthcare and Consumer Defensive at 18.42% and 12.82% respectively. Basic Materials (1.65%), Real Estate (2.73%), and Consumer Cyclical (5.53%) only make up 9.91% of the fund’s total assets.

USMV’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Utilities, Financial Services, Industrials, Communication Services, and Consumer Defensive stocks at 6.93%, 9.65%, 10.51%, 11.03%, and 12.82%.

RSP is 5.80% less exposed to the Technology sector than USMV (14.73% vs 20.53%). RSP’s exposure to Industrials and Healthcare stocks is 4.11% higher and 4.73% lower respectively (14.62% vs. 10.51% and 13.69% vs. 18.42%). In total, Basic Materials, Communication Services, and Utilities also make up 5.68% less of the fund’s holdings compared to USMV (13.93% vs. 19.61%).

Holdings

RSP - Holdings

RSP HoldingsWeight
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc0.27%
Nike Inc Class B0.25%
MSCI Inc0.25%
Monolithic Power Systems Inc0.25%
Enphase Energy Inc0.25%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc0.25%
ResMed Inc0.24%
PerkinElmer Inc0.24%
IDEXX Laboratories Inc0.24%
Danaher Corp0.24%

RSP’s Top Holdings are Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc, Nike Inc Class B, MSCI Inc, Monolithic Power Systems Inc, and Enphase Energy Inc at 0.27%, 0.25%, 0.25%, 0.25%, and 0.25%.

Advanced Micro Devices Inc (0.25%), ResMed Inc (0.24%), and PerkinElmer Inc (0.24%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. IDEXX Laboratories Inc and Danaher Corp are also represented in the RSP’s holdings at 0.24% and 0.24%.

USMV - Holdings

USMV HoldingsWeight
Eli Lilly and Co1.64%
Microsoft Corp1.62%
T-Mobile US Inc1.51%
Accenture PLC Class A1.51%
Visa Inc Class A1.49%
Waste Management Inc1.45%
Adobe Inc1.45%
The Kroger Co1.44%
Johnson & Johnson1.42%
Gilead Sciences Inc1.42%

USMV’s Top Holdings are Eli Lilly and Co, Microsoft Corp, T-Mobile US Inc, Accenture PLC Class A, and Visa Inc Class A at 1.64%, 1.62%, 1.51%, 1.51%, and 1.49%.

Waste Management Inc (1.45%), Adobe Inc (1.45%), and The Kroger Co (1.44%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Johnson & Johnson and Gilead Sciences Inc are also represented in the USMV’s holdings at 1.42% and 1.42%.

NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).

Risk Analysis

RSPUSMV
Mean Return1.190
R-squared94.470
Std. Deviation15.360
Alpha-2.450
Beta1.10
Sharpe Ratio0.890
Treynor Ratio12.120

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a Standard Deviation of 15.36 with a R-squared of 94.47 and a Beta of 1.1. Its Mean Return is 1.19 while RSP’s Treynor Ratio is 12.12. Furthermore, the fund has a Alpha of -2.45 and a Sharpe Ratio of 0.89.

The iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) has a Sharpe Ratio of 0 with a Standard Deviation of 0 and a Treynor Ratio of 0. Its Beta is 0 while USMV’s Alpha is 0. Furthermore, the fund has a Mean Return of 0 and a R-squared of 0.

RSP’s Mean Return is 1.19 points higher than that of USMV and its R-squared is 94.47 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 15.36, RSP is slightly more volatile than USMV. The Alpha and Beta of RSP are 2.45 points lower and 1.10 points higher than USMV’s Alpha and Beta.

FYI: Another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector is by investing in real estate debt. Groundfloor offers fantastic short-term, high-yield bonds that can add diversification to your portfolio!

Performance

Annual Returns

RSP vs. USMV - Annual Returns

YearRSPUSMV
202012.75%5.6%
201928.94%27.77%
2018-7.77%1.36%
201718.52%18.97%
201614.34%10.5%
2015-2.57%5.5%
201414.02%16.34%
201335.6%25.11%
201217.04%11.04%
2011-0.5%0.0%
201021.3%0.0%

RSP had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 35.6%. RSP’s worst year over the past decade yielded -7.77% and occurred in 2018. In most years the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2016, and 2012 where annual returns amounted to 14.02%, 14.34%, and 17.04% respectively.

The year 2019 was the strongest year for USMV, returning 27.77% on an annual basis. The poorest year for USMV in the last ten years was 2011, with a yield of 0.0%. Most years the iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2020, 2016, and 2012, when gains were 5.6%, 10.5%, and 11.04% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

RSP vs. USMV - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
RSP$10,000$27,37113.79%
USMV$10,000$27,60713.89%

A $10,000 investment in RSP would have resulted in a final balance of $27,371. This is a profit of $17,371 over 8 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.79%.

With a $10,000 investment in USMV, the end total would have been $27,607. This equates to a $17,607 profit over 8 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.89%.

RSP’s CAGR is 0.11 percentage points lower than that of USMV and as a result, would have yielded $236 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, RSP performed worse than USMV by 0.11% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.