Skip to content

RSP vs. DFAC: What’s The Difference?

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and the Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. RSP is a Invesco Large Blend fund and DFAC is a Dimensional Fund Advisors Large Blend fund. So, what’s the difference between RSP and DFAC? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of RSP is 0.01 percentage points higher than DFAC’s (0.2% vs. 0.19%). RSP also has a lower exposure to the technology sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, RSP has provided lower returns than DFAC over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare RSP vs. DFAC. We’ll look at portfolio growth and risk metrics, as well as at their performance and fund composition. Moreover, I’ll also discuss RSP’s and DFAC’s holdings, annual returns, and industry exposure and examine how these affect their overall returns.

Introduction To Mutual Funds
Introduction To Mutual Funds
TIP: Keep track of all your investments with Personal Capital. I use this amazing tool to aggregate all investments in one place and make sure I'm on track to financial freedom. Oh, and did I mention it's free? Try it out here (link to Personal Capital).

Summary

RSPDFAC
NameInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETFDimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
CategoryLarge BlendLarge Blend
IssuerInvescoDimensional Fund Advisors
AUM28.62B13.53B
Avg. Return13.79%13.93%
Div. Yield1.31%1.0%
Expense Ratio0.2%0.19%

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by Invesco. It currently has 28.62B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 13.79% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.31% with an expense ratio of 0.2%.

The Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by Dimensional Fund Advisors. It currently has 13.53B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 13.93% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.0% with an expense ratio of 0.19%.

RSP’s dividend yield is 0.31% higher than that of DFAC (1.31% vs. 1.0%). Also, RSP yielded on average 0.14% less per year over the past decade (13.79% vs. 13.93%). The expense ratio of RSP is 0.01 percentage points higher than DFAC’s (0.2% vs. 0.19%).

FYI: The best way I've found to invest in ETFs is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

RSP vs. DFAC - Industry Exposure

RSPDFAC
Technology14.73%22.81%
Industrials14.62%14.13%
Energy3.9%2.67%
Communication Services4.31%7.63%
Utilities5.58%1.54%
Healthcare13.69%12.09%
Consumer Defensive6.86%5.94%
Real Estate5.84%0.37%
Financial Services13.43%16.17%
Consumer Cyclical13.01%13.09%
Basic Materials4.04%3.56%

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 14.73%. This is followed by Industrials and Healthcare at 14.62% and 13.69% respectively. Basic Materials (4.04%), Communication Services (4.31%), and Utilities (5.58%) only make up 13.93% of the fund’s total assets.

RSP’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Real Estate, Consumer Defensive, Consumer Cyclical, Financial Services, and Healthcare stocks at 5.84%, 6.86%, 13.01%, 13.43%, and 13.69%.

The Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 22.81%. This is followed by Financial Services and Industrials at 16.17% and 14.13% respectively. Utilities (1.54%), Energy (2.67%), and Basic Materials (3.56%) only make up 7.77% of the fund’s total assets.

DFAC’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Communication Services, Healthcare, Consumer Cyclical, and Industrials stocks at 5.94%, 7.63%, 12.09%, 13.09%, and 14.13%.

RSP is 8.08% less exposed to the Technology sector than DFAC (14.73% vs 22.81%). RSP’s exposure to Industrials and Healthcare stocks is 0.49% higher and 1.60% higher respectively (14.62% vs. 14.13% and 13.69% vs. 12.09%). In total, Basic Materials, Communication Services, and Utilities also make up 1.20% more of the fund’s holdings compared to DFAC (13.93% vs. 12.73%).

Holdings

RSP - Holdings

RSP HoldingsWeight
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc0.27%
Nike Inc Class B0.25%
MSCI Inc0.25%
Monolithic Power Systems Inc0.25%
Enphase Energy Inc0.25%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc0.25%
ResMed Inc0.24%
PerkinElmer Inc0.24%
IDEXX Laboratories Inc0.24%
Danaher Corp0.24%

RSP’s Top Holdings are Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc, Nike Inc Class B, MSCI Inc, Monolithic Power Systems Inc, and Enphase Energy Inc at 0.27%, 0.25%, 0.25%, 0.25%, and 0.25%.

Advanced Micro Devices Inc (0.25%), ResMed Inc (0.24%), and PerkinElmer Inc (0.24%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. IDEXX Laboratories Inc and Danaher Corp are also represented in the RSP’s holdings at 0.24% and 0.24%.

DFAC - Holdings

DFAC HoldingsWeight
Apple Inc4.7%
Microsoft Corp3.81%
Amazon.com Inc2.39%
Johnson & Johnson1.05%
Facebook Inc Class A1.05%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.0%
Alphabet Inc Class C0.85%
Alphabet Inc Class A0.84%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B0.75%
Visa Inc Class A0.74%

DFAC’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Johnson & Johnson, and Facebook Inc Class A at 4.7%, 3.81%, 2.39%, 1.05%, and 1.05%.

JPMorgan Chase & Co (1.0%), Alphabet Inc Class C (0.85%), and Alphabet Inc Class A (0.84%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B and Visa Inc Class A are also represented in the DFAC’s holdings at 0.75% and 0.74%.

NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).

Risk Analysis

RSPDFAC
Mean Return1.191.19
R-squared94.4795.1
Std. Deviation15.3615.55
Alpha-2.45-2.75
Beta1.11.12
Sharpe Ratio0.890.88
Treynor Ratio12.1211.85

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a Beta of 1.1 with a Alpha of -2.45 and a Standard Deviation of 15.36. Its Treynor Ratio is 12.12 while RSP’s Mean Return is 1.19. Furthermore, the fund has a Sharpe Ratio of 0.89 and a R-squared of 94.47.

The Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) has a Mean Return of 1.19 with a Alpha of -2.75 and a R-squared of 95.1. Its Standard Deviation is 15.55 while DFAC’s Sharpe Ratio is 0.88. Furthermore, the fund has a Beta of 1.12 and a Treynor Ratio of 11.85.

RSP’s Mean Return is 0.00 points lower than that of DFAC and its R-squared is 0.63 points lower. With a Standard Deviation of 15.36, RSP is slightly less volatile than DFAC. The Alpha and Beta of RSP are 0.30 points higher and 0.02 points lower than DFAC’s Alpha and Beta.

FYI: Another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector is by investing in real estate debt. Groundfloor offers fantastic short-term, high-yield bonds that can add diversification to your portfolio!

Performance

Annual Returns

RSP vs. DFAC - Annual Returns

YearRSPDFAC
202012.75%15.8%
201928.94%29.54%
2018-7.77%-9.43%
201718.52%18.82%
201614.34%16.31%
2015-2.57%-2.53%
201414.02%9.56%
201335.6%37.55%
201217.04%17.93%
2011-0.5%-1.96%
201021.3%21.67%

RSP had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 35.6%. RSP’s worst year over the past decade yielded -7.77% and occurred in 2018. In most years the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2016, and 2012 where annual returns amounted to 14.02%, 14.34%, and 17.04% respectively.

The year 2013 was the strongest year for DFAC, returning 37.55% on an annual basis. The poorest year for DFAC in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -9.43%. Most years the Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2020, 2016, and 2012, when gains were 15.8%, 16.31%, and 17.93% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

RSP vs. DFAC - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
RSP$10,000$38,66413.79%
DFAC$10,000$38,79613.93%

A $10,000 investment in RSP would have resulted in a final balance of $38,664. This is a profit of $28,664 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.79%.

With a $10,000 investment in DFAC, the end total would have been $38,796. This equates to a $28,796 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.93%.

RSP’s CAGR is 0.14 percentage points lower than that of DFAC and as a result, would have yielded $132 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, RSP performed worse than DFAC by 0.14% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.