QQQ vs. DFAC: What’s The Difference?

The Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) and the Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. QQQ is a Invesco Large Growth fund and DFAC is a Dimensional Fund Advisors Large Blend fund. So, what’s the difference between QQQ and DFAC? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of QQQ is 0.01 percentage points higher than DFAC’s (0.2% vs. 0.19%). QQQ also has a higher exposure to the technology sector and a higher standard deviation. Overall, QQQ has provided higher returns than DFAC over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare QQQ vs. DFAC. We’ll look at annual returns and industry exposure, as well as at their portfolio growth and risk metrics. Moreover, I’ll also discuss QQQ’s and DFAC’s performance, fund composition, and holdings and examine how these affect their overall returns.

Summary

QQQ DFAC
Name Invesco QQQ Trust Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
Category Large Growth Large Blend
Issuer Invesco Dimensional Fund Advisors
AUM 174.51B 13.53B
Avg. Return 21.27% 13.93%
Div. Yield 0.49% 1.0%
Expense Ratio 0.2% 0.19%

The Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) is a Large Growth fund that is issued by Invesco. It currently has 174.51B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 21.27% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.49% with an expense ratio of 0.2%.

The Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by Dimensional Fund Advisors. It currently has 13.53B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 13.93% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.0% with an expense ratio of 0.19%.

QQQ’s dividend yield is 0.51% lower than that of DFAC (0.49% vs. 1.0%). Also, QQQ yielded on average 7.34% more per year over the past decade (21.27% vs. 13.93%). The expense ratio of QQQ is 0.01 percentage points higher than DFAC’s (0.2% vs. 0.19%).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

QQQ vs. DFAC - Industry Exposure

QQQ DFAC
Technology 45.46% 22.81%
Industrials 2.61% 14.13%
Energy 0.0% 2.67%
Communication Services 19.55% 7.63%
Utilities 0.89% 1.54%
Healthcare 7.04% 12.09%
Consumer Defensive 4.68% 5.94%
Real Estate 0.0% 0.37%
Financial Services 2.51% 16.17%
Consumer Cyclical 17.27% 13.09%
Basic Materials 0.0% 3.56%

The Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 45.46%. This is followed by Communication Services and Consumer Cyclical at 19.55% and 17.27% respectively. Real Estate (0.0%), Energy (0.0%), and Utilities (0.89%) only make up 0.89% of the fund’s total assets.

QQQ’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Financial Services, Industrials, Consumer Defensive, Healthcare, and Consumer Cyclical stocks at 2.51%, 2.61%, 4.68%, 7.04%, and 17.27%.

The Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 22.81%. This is followed by Financial Services and Industrials at 16.17% and 14.13% respectively. Utilities (1.54%), Energy (2.67%), and Basic Materials (3.56%) only make up 7.77% of the fund’s total assets.

DFAC’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Communication Services, Healthcare, Consumer Cyclical, and Industrials stocks at 5.94%, 7.63%, 12.09%, 13.09%, and 14.13%.

QQQ is 22.65% more exposed to the Technology sector than DFAC (45.46% vs 22.81%). QQQ’s exposure to Communication Services and Consumer Cyclical stocks is 11.92% higher and 4.18% higher respectively (19.55% vs. 7.63% and 17.27% vs. 13.09%). In total, Real Estate, Energy, and Utilities also make up 3.69% less of the fund’s holdings compared to DFAC (0.89% vs. 4.58%).

Holdings

QQQ - Holdings

QQQ Holdings Weight
Apple Inc 11.0%
Microsoft Corp 9.82%
Amazon.com Inc 8.35%
Facebook Inc Class A 4.01%
Facebook Inc A 4.01%
Alphabet Inc Class C 3.9%
Tesla Inc 3.9%
NVIDIA Corp 3.65%
Alphabet Inc Class A 3.53%
Alphabet Inc A 3.53%

QQQ’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc Class A, and Facebook Inc A at 11.0%, 9.82%, 8.35%, 4.01%, and 4.01%.

Alphabet Inc Class C (3.9%), Tesla Inc (3.9%), and NVIDIA Corp (3.65%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Alphabet Inc Class A and Alphabet Inc A are also represented in the QQQ’s holdings at 3.53% and 3.53%.

DFAC - Holdings

DFAC Holdings Weight
Apple Inc 4.7%
Microsoft Corp 3.81%
Amazon.com Inc 2.39%
Johnson & Johnson 1.05%
Facebook Inc Class A 1.05%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.0%
Alphabet Inc Class C 0.85%
Alphabet Inc Class A 0.84%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B 0.75%
Visa Inc Class A 0.74%

DFAC’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Johnson & Johnson, and Facebook Inc Class A at 4.7%, 3.81%, 2.39%, 1.05%, and 1.05%.

JPMorgan Chase & Co (1.0%), Alphabet Inc Class C (0.85%), and Alphabet Inc Class A (0.84%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B and Visa Inc Class A are also represented in the DFAC’s holdings at 0.75% and 0.74%.

Performance

Annual Returns

QQQ vs. DFAC - Annual Returns

Year QQQ DFAC
2020 48.6% 15.8%
2019 39.12% 29.54%
2018 -0.14% -9.43%
2017 32.7% 18.82%
2016 7.01% 16.31%
2015 9.54% -2.53%
2014 19.12% 9.56%
2013 36.6% 37.55%
2012 18.09% 17.93%
2011 3.44% -1.96%
2010 19.89% 21.67%

QQQ had its best year in 2020 with an annual return of 48.6%. QQQ’s worst year over the past decade yielded -0.14% and occurred in 2018. In most years the Invesco QQQ Trust provided moderate returns such as in 2012, 2014, and 2010 where annual returns amounted to 18.09%, 19.12%, and 19.89% respectively.

The year 2013 was the strongest year for DFAC, returning 37.55% on an annual basis. The poorest year for DFAC in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -9.43%. Most years the Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2020, 2016, and 2012, when gains were 15.8%, 16.31%, and 17.93% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

QQQ vs. DFAC - Portfolio Growth

Fund Initial Balance Final Balance CAGR
QQQ $10,000 $76,522 21.27%
DFAC $10,000 $38,796 13.93%

A $10,000 investment in QQQ would have resulted in a final balance of $76,522. This is a profit of $66,522 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 21.27%.

With a $10,000 investment in DFAC, the end total would have been $38,796. This equates to a $28,796 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.93%.

QQQ’s CAGR is 7.34 percentage points higher than that of DFAC and as a result, would have yielded $37,726 more on a $10,000 investment. Thus, QQQ outperformed DFAC by 7.34% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

2) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

3) If you are interested in crypto, check out Gemini. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to the growing crypto space and Gemini has just been a breeze to use. Once you register, make sure to also open an Active Trader account to buy crypto at the lowest fees on the market (just 0.03%!).

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Leave a Reply