IXUS vs. XLC: What’s The Difference?

The iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and the Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IXUS is a iShares Foreign Large Blend fund and XLC is a SPDR State Street Global Advisors Communications fund. So, what’s the difference between IXUS and XLC? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of IXUS is 0.03 percentage points lower than XLC’s (0.09% vs. 0.12%). IXUS also has a higher exposure to the financial services sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, IXUS has provided lower returns than XLC over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare IXUS vs. XLC. We’ll look at fund composition and holdings, as well as at their annual returns and portfolio growth. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IXUS’s and XLC’s performance, industry exposure, and risk metrics and examine how these affect their overall returns.

Summary

IXUS XLC
Name iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
Category Foreign Large Blend Communications
Issuer iShares SPDR State Street Global Advisors
AUM 29.54B 14.09B
Avg. Return 6.09% 29.04%
Div. Yield 2.13% 0.62%
Expense Ratio 0.09% 0.12%

The iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) is a Foreign Large Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 29.54B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 6.09% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 2.13% with an expense ratio of 0.09%.

The Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) is a Communications fund that is issued by SPDR State Street Global Advisors. It currently has 14.09B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 29.04% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.62% with an expense ratio of 0.12%.

IXUS’s dividend yield is 1.51% higher than that of XLC (2.13% vs. 0.62%). Also, IXUS yielded on average 22.95% less per year over the past decade (6.09% vs. 29.04%). The expense ratio of IXUS is 0.03 percentage points lower than XLC’s (0.09% vs. 0.12%).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

IXUS vs. XLC - Industry Exposure

IXUS XLC
Technology 13.24% 0.0%
Industrials 12.78% 0.0%
Energy 4.39% 0.0%
Communication Services 7.09% 100.0%
Utilities 2.95% 0.0%
Healthcare 9.29% 0.0%
Consumer Defensive 8.19% 0.0%
Real Estate 3.66% 0.0%
Financial Services 17.34% 0.0%
Consumer Cyclical 12.57% 0.0%
Basic Materials 8.5% 0.0%

The iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) has the most exposure to the Financial Services sector at 17.34%. This is followed by Technology and Industrials at 13.24% and 12.78% respectively. Real Estate (3.66%), Energy (4.39%), and Communication Services (7.09%) only make up 15.14% of the fund’s total assets.

IXUS’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Basic Materials, Healthcare, Consumer Cyclical, and Industrials stocks at 8.19%, 8.5%, 9.29%, 12.57%, and 12.78%.

The Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) has the most exposure to the Communication Services sector at 100.0%. This is followed by Technology and Industrials at 0.0% and 0.0% respectively. Consumer Cyclical (0.0%), Financial Services (0.0%), and Real Estate (0.0%) only make up 0.00% of the fund’s total assets.

XLC’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Healthcare, Utilities, Energy, and Industrials stocks at 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0%.

IXUS is 17.34% more exposed to the Financial Services sector than XLC (17.34% vs 0.0%). IXUS’s exposure to Technology and Industrials stocks is 13.24% higher and 12.78% higher respectively (13.24% vs. 0.0% and 12.78% vs. 0.0%). In total, Real Estate, Energy, and Communication Services also make up 84.86% less of the fund’s holdings compared to XLC (15.14% vs. 100.00%).

Holdings

IXUS - Holdings

IXUS Holdings Weight
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 1.64%
Tencent Holdings Ltd 1.35%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares 1.34%
Nestle SA 1.1%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 1.06%
ASML Holding NV 0.9%
Roche Holding AG 0.81%
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE 0.67%
Novartis AG 0.62%
Toyota Motor Corp 0.59%

IXUS’s Top Holdings are Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd, Tencent Holdings Ltd, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares, Nestle SA, and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd at 1.64%, 1.35%, 1.34%, 1.1%, and 1.06%.

ASML Holding NV (0.9%), Roche Holding AG (0.81%), and LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE (0.67%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Novartis AG and Toyota Motor Corp are also represented in the IXUS’s holdings at 0.62% and 0.59%.

XLC - Holdings

XLC Holdings Weight
Facebook Inc A 23.75%
Alphabet Inc A 11.49%
Alphabet Inc Class C 11.16%
Netflix Inc 4.78%
Charter Communications Inc A 4.65%
Comcast Corp Class A 4.44%
T-Mobile US Inc 4.41%
The Walt Disney Co 4.39%
AT&T Inc 4.35%
Verizon Communications Inc 4.33%

XLC’s Top Holdings are Facebook Inc A, Alphabet Inc A, Alphabet Inc Class C, Netflix Inc, and Charter Communications Inc A at 23.75%, 11.49%, 11.16%, 4.78%, and 4.65%.

Comcast Corp Class A (4.44%), T-Mobile US Inc (4.41%), and The Walt Disney Co (4.39%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. AT&T Inc and Verizon Communications Inc are also represented in the XLC’s holdings at 4.35% and 4.33%.

Risk Analysis

IXUS XLC
Mean Return 0 0
R-squared 0 0
Std. Deviation 0 0
Alpha 0 0
Beta 0 0
Sharpe Ratio 0 0
Treynor Ratio 0 0

The iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) has a Treynor Ratio of 0 with a Mean Return of 0 and a Sharpe Ratio of 0. Its Alpha is 0 while IXUS’s Beta is 0. Furthermore, the fund has a Standard Deviation of 0 and a R-squared of 0.

The Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) has a Mean Return of 0 with a Alpha of 0 and a Beta of 0. Its Sharpe Ratio is 0 while XLC’s Treynor Ratio is 0. Furthermore, the fund has a Standard Deviation of 0 and a R-squared of 0.

IXUS’s Mean Return is 0.00 points lower than that of XLC and its R-squared is 0.00 points lower. With a Standard Deviation of 0, IXUS is slightly less volatile than XLC. The Alpha and Beta of IXUS are 0.00 points lower and 0.00 points lower than XLC’s Alpha and Beta.

Performance

Annual Returns

IXUS vs. XLC - Annual Returns

Year IXUS XLC
2020 11.14% 26.85%
2019 21.85% 31.22%
2018 -14.55% 0.0%
2017 28.08% 0.0%
2016 4.66% 0.0%
2015 -4.62% 0.0%
2014 -3.96% 0.0%
2013 15.85% 0.0%
2012 0.0% 0.0%
2011 0.0% 0.0%
2010 0.0% 0.0%

IXUS had its best year in 2017 with an annual return of 28.08%. IXUS’s worst year over the past decade yielded -14.55% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2011, 2010, and 2016 where annual returns amounted to 0.0%, 0.0%, and 4.66% respectively.

The year 2019 was the strongest year for XLC, returning 31.22% on an annual basis. The poorest year for XLC in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of 0.0%. Most years the Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund has given investors modest returns, such as in 2014, 2013, and 2012, when gains were 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

IXUS vs. XLC - Portfolio Growth

Fund Initial Balance Final Balance CAGR
IXUS $10,000 $13,542 6.09%
XLC $10,000 $16,645 29.04%

A $10,000 investment in IXUS would have resulted in a final balance of $13,542. This is a profit of $3,542 over 2 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.09%.

With a $10,000 investment in XLC, the end total would have been $16,645. This equates to a $6,645 profit over 2 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 29.04%.

IXUS’s CAGR is 22.95 percentage points lower than that of XLC and as a result, would have yielded $3,103 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IXUS performed worse than XLC by 22.95% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

2) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

3) If you are interested in crypto, check out Gemini. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to the growing crypto space and Gemini has just been a breeze to use. Once you register, make sure to also open an Active Trader account to buy crypto at the lowest fees on the market (just 0.03%!).

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Leave a Reply