Skip to content

IXUS vs. VHT: What’s The Difference?

The iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and the Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares (VHT) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IXUS is a iShares Foreign Large Blend fund and VHT is a Vanguard Health fund. So, what’s the difference between IXUS and VHT? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of IXUS is 0.01 percentage points lower than VHT’s (0.09% vs. 0.1%). IXUS also has a higher exposure to the financial services sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, IXUS has provided lower returns than VHT over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare IXUS vs. VHT. We’ll look at portfolio growth and holdings, as well as at their risk metrics and annual returns. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IXUS’s and VHT’s industry exposure, performance, and fund composition and examine how these affect their overall returns.

TIP: Keep track of all your investments with Personal Capital. I use this amazing tool to aggregate all investments in one place and make sure I'm on track to financial freedom. Oh, and did I mention it's free? Try it out here (link to Personal Capital).

Summary

IXUSVHT
NameiShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETFVanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares
CategoryForeign Large BlendHealth
IssueriSharesVanguard
AUM29.54B17.94B
Avg. Return6.09%16.04%
Div. Yield2.13%1.15%
Expense Ratio0.09%0.1%

The iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) is a Foreign Large Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 29.54B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 6.09% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 2.13% with an expense ratio of 0.09%.

The Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares (VHT) is a Health fund that is issued by Vanguard. It currently has 17.94B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 16.04% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.15% with an expense ratio of 0.1%.

IXUS’s dividend yield is 0.98% higher than that of VHT (2.13% vs. 1.15%). Also, IXUS yielded on average 9.95% less per year over the past decade (6.09% vs. 16.04%). The expense ratio of IXUS is 0.01 percentage points lower than VHT’s (0.09% vs. 0.1%).

FYI: The best way I've found to invest in ETFs is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

IXUS vs. VHT - Industry Exposure

IXUSVHT
Technology13.24%0.05%
Industrials12.78%0.05%
Energy4.39%0.0%
Communication Services7.09%0.0%
Utilities2.95%0.0%
Healthcare9.29%99.57%
Consumer Defensive8.19%0.0%
Real Estate3.66%0.0%
Financial Services17.34%0.02%
Consumer Cyclical12.57%0.0%
Basic Materials8.5%0.31%

The iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) has the most exposure to the Financial Services sector at 17.34%. This is followed by Technology and Industrials at 13.24% and 12.78% respectively. Real Estate (3.66%), Energy (4.39%), and Communication Services (7.09%) only make up 15.14% of the fund’s total assets.

IXUS’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Basic Materials, Healthcare, Consumer Cyclical, and Industrials stocks at 8.19%, 8.5%, 9.29%, 12.57%, and 12.78%.

The Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares (VHT) has the most exposure to the Healthcare sector at 99.57%. This is followed by Basic Materials and Technology at 0.31% and 0.05% respectively. Real Estate (0.0%), Consumer Defensive (0.0%), and Utilities (0.0%) only make up 0.00% of the fund’s total assets.

VHT’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Communication Services, Energy, Financial Services, Industrials, and Technology stocks at 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.02%, 0.05%, and 0.05%.

IXUS is 17.32% more exposed to the Financial Services sector than VHT (17.34% vs 0.02%). IXUS’s exposure to Technology and Industrials stocks is 13.19% higher and 12.73% higher respectively (13.24% vs. 0.05% and 12.78% vs. 0.05%). In total, Real Estate, Energy, and Communication Services also make up 15.14% more of the fund’s holdings compared to VHT (15.14% vs. 0.00%).

Holdings

IXUS - Holdings

IXUS HoldingsWeight
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd1.64%
Tencent Holdings Ltd1.35%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares1.34%
Nestle SA1.1%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd1.06%
ASML Holding NV0.9%
Roche Holding AG0.81%
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE0.67%
Novartis AG0.62%
Toyota Motor Corp0.59%

IXUS’s Top Holdings are Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd, Tencent Holdings Ltd, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares, Nestle SA, and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd at 1.64%, 1.35%, 1.34%, 1.1%, and 1.06%.

ASML Holding NV (0.9%), Roche Holding AG (0.81%), and LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE (0.67%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Novartis AG and Toyota Motor Corp are also represented in the IXUS’s holdings at 0.62% and 0.59%.

VHT - Holdings

VHT HoldingsWeight
Johnson & Johnson7.34%
UnitedHealth Group Inc6.44%
Pfizer Inc3.7%
Abbott Laboratories3.48%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc3.37%
AbbVie Inc3.37%
Merck & Co Inc3.33%
Eli Lilly and Co3.17%
Danaher Corp2.91%
Medtronic PLC2.83%

VHT’s Top Holdings are Johnson & Johnson, UnitedHealth Group Inc, Pfizer Inc, Abbott Laboratories, and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc at 7.34%, 6.44%, 3.7%, 3.48%, and 3.37%.

AbbVie Inc (3.37%), Merck & Co Inc (3.33%), and Eli Lilly and Co (3.17%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Danaher Corp and Medtronic PLC are also represented in the VHT’s holdings at 2.91% and 2.83%.

NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).

Risk Analysis

IXUSVHT
Mean Return01.33
R-squared059.86
Std. Deviation013.58
Alpha07.99
Beta00.75
Sharpe Ratio01.13
Treynor Ratio020.74

The iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) has a Treynor Ratio of 0 with a Beta of 0 and a Sharpe Ratio of 0. Its Alpha is 0 while IXUS’s Standard Deviation is 0. Furthermore, the fund has a Mean Return of 0 and a R-squared of 0.

The Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares (VHT) has a Alpha of 7.99 with a Treynor Ratio of 20.74 and a Mean Return of 1.33. Its Standard Deviation is 13.58 while VHT’s Sharpe Ratio is 1.13. Furthermore, the fund has a Beta of 0.75 and a R-squared of 59.86.

IXUS’s Mean Return is 1.33 points lower than that of VHT and its R-squared is 59.86 points lower. With a Standard Deviation of 0, IXUS is slightly less volatile than VHT. The Alpha and Beta of IXUS are 7.99 points lower and 0.75 points lower than VHT’s Alpha and Beta.

FYI: Another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector is by investing in real estate debt. Groundfloor offers fantastic short-term, high-yield bonds that can add diversification to your portfolio!

Performance

Annual Returns

IXUS vs. VHT - Annual Returns

YearIXUSVHT
202011.14%18.21%
201921.85%21.97%
2018-14.55%5.55%
201728.08%23.34%
20164.66%-3.33%
2015-4.62%7.22%
2014-3.96%25.38%
201315.85%42.67%
20120.0%19.1%
20110.0%10.57%
20100.0%5.75%

IXUS had its best year in 2017 with an annual return of 28.08%. IXUS’s worst year over the past decade yielded -14.55% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2011, 2010, and 2016 where annual returns amounted to 0.0%, 0.0%, and 4.66% respectively.

The year 2013 was the strongest year for VHT, returning 42.67% on an annual basis. The poorest year for VHT in the last ten years was 2016, with a yield of -3.33%. Most years the Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares has given investors modest returns, such as in 2011, 2020, and 2012, when gains were 10.57%, 18.21%, and 19.1% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

IXUS vs. VHT - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
IXUS$10,000$14,2096.09%
VHT$10,000$24,39216.04%

A $10,000 investment in IXUS would have resulted in a final balance of $14,209. This is a profit of $4,209 over 7 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.09%.

With a $10,000 investment in VHT, the end total would have been $24,392. This equates to a $14,392 profit over 7 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 16.04%.

IXUS’s CAGR is 9.95 percentage points lower than that of VHT and as a result, would have yielded $10,183 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IXUS performed worse than VHT by 9.95% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.