Skip to content

IWR vs. BIV: What’s The Difference?

The iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF (IWR) and the Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BIV) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IWR is a iShares Mid-Cap Blend fund and BIV is a Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond fund. So, what’s the difference between IWR and BIV? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of IWR is 0.14 percentage points higher than BIV’s (0.19% vs. 0.05%). IWR also has a high exposure to the technology sector while BIV is mostly comprised of AAA bonds. Overall, IWR has provided higher returns than BIV over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare IWR vs. BIV. We’ll look at holdings and performance, as well as at their industry exposure and annual returns. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IWR’s and BIV’s risk metrics, portfolio growth, and fund composition and examine how these affect their overall returns.

TIP: Keep track of all your investments with Personal Capital. I use this amazing tool to aggregate all investments in one place and make sure I'm on track to financial freedom. Oh, and did I mention it's free? Try it out here (link to Personal Capital).

Summary

IWRBIV
NameiShares Russell Mid-Cap ETFVanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
CategoryMid-Cap BlendIntermediate-Term Bond
IssueriSharesVanguard
AUM29.84B39.05B
Avg. Return14.15%5.31%
Div. Yield0.99%2.06%
Expense Ratio0.19%0.05%

The iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF (IWR) is a Mid-Cap Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 29.84B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 14.15% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.99% with an expense ratio of 0.19%.

The Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BIV) is a Intermediate-Term Bond fund that is issued by Vanguard. It currently has 39.05B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 5.31% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 2.06% with an expense ratio of 0.05%.

IWR’s dividend yield is 1.07% lower than that of BIV (0.99% vs. 2.06%). Also, IWR yielded on average 8.84% more per year over the past decade (14.15% vs. 5.31%). The expense ratio of IWR is 0.14 percentage points higher than BIV’s (0.19% vs. 0.05%).

FYI: The best way I've found to invest in ETFs is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).

Fund Composition

Holdings

IWR - Holdings

IWR HoldingsWeight
IDEXX Laboratories Inc0.51%
DocuSign Inc0.51%
Twitter Inc0.48%
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc0.47%
Roku Inc Class A0.44%
Marvell Technology Inc0.44%
DexCom Inc0.44%
Trane Technologies PLC0.43%
MSCI Inc0.43%
Carrier Global Corp Ordinary Shares0.43%

IWR’s Top Holdings are IDEXX Laboratories Inc, DocuSign Inc, Twitter Inc, Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc, and Roku Inc Class A at 0.51%, 0.51%, 0.48%, 0.47%, and 0.44%.

Marvell Technology Inc (0.44%), DexCom Inc (0.44%), and Trane Technologies PLC (0.43%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. MSCI Inc and Carrier Global Corp Ordinary Shares are also represented in the IWR’s holdings at 0.43% and 0.43%.

BIV - Holdings

BIV Bond SectorsWeight
AAA54.51%
BBB25.24%
A16.97%
AA3.1%
Others0.15%
Below B0.03%
B0.0%
BB0.0%
US Government0.0%

BIV’s Top Bond Sectors are ratings of AAA, BBB, A, AA, and Others at 54.51%, 25.24%, 16.97%, 3.1%, and 0.15%. The fund is less weighted towards Below B (0.03%), B (0.0%), and BB (0.0%) rated bonds.

NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).

Risk Analysis

IWRBIV
Mean Return1.170.35
R-squared91.5295.12
Std. Deviation15.664.09
Alpha-2.8-0.07
Beta1.111.33
Sharpe Ratio0.860.89
Treynor Ratio11.722.72

The iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF (IWR) has a Mean Return of 1.17 with a R-squared of 91.52 and a Treynor Ratio of 11.72. Its Standard Deviation is 15.66 while IWR’s Alpha is -2.8. Furthermore, the fund has a Sharpe Ratio of 0.86 and a Beta of 1.11.

The Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BIV) has a R-squared of 95.12 with a Sharpe Ratio of 0.89 and a Beta of 1.33. Its Treynor Ratio is 2.72 while BIV’s Standard Deviation is 4.09. Furthermore, the fund has a Mean Return of 0.35 and a Alpha of -0.07.

IWR’s Mean Return is 0.82 points higher than that of BIV and its R-squared is 3.60 points lower. With a Standard Deviation of 15.66, IWR is slightly more volatile than BIV. The Alpha and Beta of IWR are 2.73 points lower and 0.22 points lower than BIV’s Alpha and Beta.

FYI: Another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector is by investing in real estate debt. Groundfloor offers fantastic short-term, high-yield bonds that can add diversification to your portfolio!

Performance

Annual Returns

IWR vs. BIV - Annual Returns

YearIWRBIV
202016.91%9.71%
201930.31%10.19%
2018-9.13%-0.09%
201718.32%3.8%
201613.58%2.86%
2015-2.57%1.23%
201413.03%7.0%
201334.5%-3.44%
201217.13%7.02%
2011-1.67%10.62%
201025.25%9.55%

IWR had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 34.5%. IWR’s worst year over the past decade yielded -9.13% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2016, 2020, and 2012 where annual returns amounted to 13.58%, 16.91%, and 17.13% respectively.

The year 2011 was the strongest year for BIV, returning 10.62% on an annual basis. The poorest year for BIV in the last ten years was 2013, with a yield of -3.44%. Most years the Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares has given investors modest returns, such as in 2017, 2014, and 2012, when gains were 3.8%, 7.0%, and 7.02% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

IWR vs. BIV - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
IWR$10,000$39,75114.15%
BIV$10,000$17,4925.31%

A $10,000 investment in IWR would have resulted in a final balance of $39,751. This is a profit of $29,751 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.15%.

With a $10,000 investment in BIV, the end total would have been $17,492. This equates to a $7,492 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.31%.

IWR’s CAGR is 8.84 percentage points higher than that of BIV and as a result, would have yielded $22,259 more on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IWR outperformed BIV by 8.84% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.