Skip to content

IWM vs. XLE: What’s The Difference?

The iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IWM is a iShares Small Blend fund and XLE is a SPDR State Street Global Advisors Equity Energy fund. So, what’s the difference between IWM and XLE? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of IWM is 0.07 percentage points higher than XLE’s (0.19% vs. 0.12%). IWM also has a higher exposure to the healthcare sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, IWM has provided higher returns than XLE over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare IWM vs. XLE. We’ll look at portfolio growth and fund composition, as well as at their holdings and industry exposure. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IWM’s and XLE’s annual returns, performance, and risk metrics and examine how these affect their overall returns.

Introduction To Mutual Funds
Introduction To Mutual Funds
TIP: Keep track of all your investments with Personal Capital. I use this amazing tool to aggregate all investments in one place and make sure I'm on track to financial freedom. Oh, and did I mention it's free? Try it out here (link to Personal Capital).

Summary

IWMXLE
NameiShares Russell 2000 ETFEnergy Select Sector SPDR Fund
CategorySmall BlendEquity Energy
IssueriSharesSPDR State Street Global Advisors
AUM66.48B25.55B
Avg. Return13.52%1.28%
Div. Yield0.86%3.92%
Expense Ratio0.19%0.12%

The iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) is a Small Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 66.48B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 13.52% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.86% with an expense ratio of 0.19%.

The Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) is a Equity Energy fund that is issued by SPDR State Street Global Advisors. It currently has 25.55B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 1.28% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 3.92% with an expense ratio of 0.12%.

IWM’s dividend yield is 3.06% lower than that of XLE (0.86% vs. 3.92%). Also, IWM yielded on average 12.24% more per year over the past decade (13.52% vs. 1.28%). The expense ratio of IWM is 0.07 percentage points higher than XLE’s (0.19% vs. 0.12%).

FYI: The best way I've found to invest in ETFs is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

IWM vs. XLE - Industry Exposure

IWMXLE
Technology14.21%0.0%
Industrials14.78%0.0%
Energy3.74%100.0%
Communication Services3.79%0.0%
Utilities2.44%0.0%
Healthcare20.3%0.0%
Consumer Defensive3.65%0.0%
Real Estate8.59%0.0%
Financial Services13.76%0.0%
Consumer Cyclical10.99%0.0%
Basic Materials3.74%0.0%

The iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has the most exposure to the Healthcare sector at 20.3%. This is followed by Industrials and Technology at 14.78% and 14.21% respectively. Consumer Defensive (3.65%), Basic Materials (3.74%), and Energy (3.74%) only make up 11.13% of the fund’s total assets.

IWM’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Communication Services, Real Estate, Consumer Cyclical, Financial Services, and Technology stocks at 3.79%, 8.59%, 10.99%, 13.76%, and 14.21%.

The Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) has the most exposure to the Energy sector at 100.0%. This is followed by Technology and Industrials at 0.0% and 0.0% respectively. Consumer Cyclical (0.0%), Financial Services (0.0%), and Real Estate (0.0%) only make up 0.00% of the fund’s total assets.

XLE’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Healthcare, Utilities, Communication Services, and Industrials stocks at 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0%.

IWM is 20.30% more exposed to the Healthcare sector than XLE (20.3% vs 0.0%). IWM’s exposure to Industrials and Technology stocks is 14.78% higher and 14.21% higher respectively (14.78% vs. 0.0% and 14.21% vs. 0.0%). In total, Consumer Defensive, Basic Materials, and Energy also make up 88.87% less of the fund’s holdings compared to XLE (11.13% vs. 100.00%).

Holdings

IWM - Holdings

IWM HoldingsWeight
AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc Class A0.52%
Intellia Therapeutics Inc0.33%
Crocs Inc0.3%
BlackRock Cash Funds Treasury SL Agency0.29%
Tenet Healthcare Corp0.26%
Lattice Semiconductor Corp0.26%
Tetra Tech Inc0.25%
II-VI Inc0.25%
EastGroup Properties Inc0.24%
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals Inc0.24%

IWM’s Top Holdings are AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc Class A, Intellia Therapeutics Inc, Crocs Inc, BlackRock Cash Funds Treasury SL Agency, and Tenet Healthcare Corp at 0.52%, 0.33%, 0.3%, 0.29%, and 0.26%.

Lattice Semiconductor Corp (0.26%), Tetra Tech Inc (0.25%), and II-VI Inc (0.25%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. EastGroup Properties Inc and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals Inc are also represented in the IWM’s holdings at 0.24% and 0.24%.

XLE - Holdings

XLE HoldingsWeight
Exxon Mobil Corp23.7%
Chevron Corp20.03%
ConocoPhillips4.64%
EOG Resources Inc4.46%
Schlumberger Ltd4.43%
Marathon Petroleum Corp4.17%
Pioneer Natural Resources Co4.08%
Phillips 664.07%
Kinder Morgan Inc Class P3.85%
Williams Companies Inc3.5%

XLE’s Top Holdings are Exxon Mobil Corp, Chevron Corp, ConocoPhillips, EOG Resources Inc, and Schlumberger Ltd at 23.7%, 20.03%, 4.64%, 4.46%, and 4.43%.

Marathon Petroleum Corp (4.17%), Pioneer Natural Resources Co (4.08%), and Phillips 66 (4.07%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Kinder Morgan Inc Class P and Williams Companies Inc are also represented in the XLE’s holdings at 3.85% and 3.5%.

NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).

Risk Analysis

IWMXLE
Mean Return1.120.32
R-squared77.7361.84
Std. Deviation18.8727.52
Alpha-5.12-11.98
Beta1.231.54
Sharpe Ratio0.680.12
Treynor Ratio9.56-0.4

The iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a R-squared of 77.73 with a Beta of 1.23 and a Mean Return of 1.12. Its Sharpe Ratio is 0.68 while IWM’s Alpha is -5.12. Furthermore, the fund has a Standard Deviation of 18.87 and a Treynor Ratio of 9.56.

The Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) has a Mean Return of 0.32 with a Alpha of -11.98 and a Beta of 1.54. Its Treynor Ratio is -0.4 while XLE’s R-squared is 61.84. Furthermore, the fund has a Standard Deviation of 27.52 and a Sharpe Ratio of 0.12.

IWM’s Mean Return is 0.80 points higher than that of XLE and its R-squared is 15.89 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 18.87, IWM is slightly less volatile than XLE. The Alpha and Beta of IWM are 6.86 points higher and 0.31 points lower than XLE’s Alpha and Beta.

FYI: Another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector is by investing in real estate debt. Groundfloor offers fantastic short-term, high-yield bonds that can add diversification to your portfolio!

Performance

Annual Returns

IWM vs. XLE - Annual Returns

YearIWMXLE
202019.89%-32.56%
201925.42%11.87%
2018-11.02%-18.1%
201714.66%-1.01%
201621.36%27.95%
2015-4.33%-21.47%
20144.94%-8.61%
201338.85%26.16%
201216.39%5.17%
2011-4.19%2.98%
201026.76%21.7%

IWM had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 38.85%. IWM’s worst year over the past decade yielded -11.02% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Russell 2000 ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2017, 2012, and 2020 where annual returns amounted to 14.66%, 16.39%, and 19.89% respectively.

The year 2016 was the strongest year for XLE, returning 27.95% on an annual basis. The poorest year for XLE in the last ten years was 2020, with a yield of -32.56%. Most years the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund has given investors modest returns, such as in 2017, 2011, and 2012, when gains were -1.01%, 2.98%, and 5.17% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

IWM vs. XLE - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
IWM$10,000$36,68613.52%
XLE$10,000$9,3391.28%

A $10,000 investment in IWM would have resulted in a final balance of $36,686. This is a profit of $26,686 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.52%.

With a $10,000 investment in XLE, the end total would have been $9,339. This equates to a $-661 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 1.28%.

IWM’s CAGR is 12.24 percentage points higher than that of XLE and as a result, would have yielded $27,347 more on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IWM outperformed XLE by 12.24% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.