Skip to content

IWF vs. DIA: What’s The Difference?

The iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and the SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IWF is a iShares Large Growth fund and DIA is a SPDR State Street Global Advisors Large Value fund. So, what’s the difference between IWF and DIA? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of IWF is 0.03 percentage points higher than DIA’s (0.19% vs. 0.16%). IWF also has a higher exposure to the technology sector and a higher standard deviation. Overall, IWF has provided higher returns than DIA over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare IWF vs. DIA. We’ll look at performance and risk metrics, as well as at their holdings and annual returns. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IWF’s and DIA’s fund composition, industry exposure, and portfolio growth and examine how these affect their overall returns.

TIP: Keep track of all your investments with Personal Capital. I use this amazing tool to aggregate all investments in one place and make sure I'm on track to financial freedom. Oh, and did I mention it's free? Try it out here (link to Personal Capital).

Summary

IWFDIA
NameiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETFSPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
CategoryLarge GrowthLarge Value
IssueriSharesSPDR State Street Global Advisors
AUM72.16B30.46B
Avg. Return17.72%13.35%
Div. Yield0.52%1.61%
Expense Ratio0.19%0.16%

The iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) is a Large Growth fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 72.16B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 17.72% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.52% with an expense ratio of 0.19%.

The SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) is a Large Value fund that is issued by SPDR State Street Global Advisors. It currently has 30.46B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 13.35% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.61% with an expense ratio of 0.16%.

IWF’s dividend yield is 1.09% lower than that of DIA (0.52% vs. 1.61%). Also, IWF yielded on average 4.37% more per year over the past decade (17.72% vs. 13.35%). The expense ratio of IWF is 0.03 percentage points higher than DIA’s (0.19% vs. 0.16%).

FYI: The best way I've found to invest in ETFs is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

IWF vs. DIA - Industry Exposure

IWFDIA
Technology39.29%17.32%
Industrials6.19%16.7%
Energy0.28%2.0%
Communication Services12.82%4.42%
Utilities0.03%0.0%
Healthcare9.23%17.92%
Consumer Defensive4.31%6.3%
Real Estate1.85%0.0%
Financial Services7.36%20.68%
Consumer Cyclical17.62%13.44%
Basic Materials1.01%1.21%

The iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 39.29%. This is followed by Consumer Cyclical and Communication Services at 17.62% and 12.82% respectively. Energy (0.28%), Basic Materials (1.01%), and Real Estate (1.85%) only make up 3.14% of the fund’s total assets.

IWF’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Industrials, Financial Services, Healthcare, and Communication Services stocks at 4.31%, 6.19%, 7.36%, 9.23%, and 12.82%.

The SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) has the most exposure to the Financial Services sector at 20.68%. This is followed by Healthcare and Technology at 17.92% and 17.32% respectively. Utilities (0.0%), Basic Materials (1.21%), and Energy (2.0%) only make up 3.21% of the fund’s total assets.

DIA’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Communication Services, Consumer Defensive, Consumer Cyclical, Industrials, and Technology stocks at 4.42%, 6.3%, 13.44%, 16.7%, and 17.32%.

IWF is 21.97% more exposed to the Technology sector than DIA (39.29% vs 17.32%). IWF’s exposure to Consumer Cyclical and Communication Services stocks is 4.18% higher and 8.40% higher respectively (17.62% vs. 13.44% and 12.82% vs. 4.42%). In total, Energy, Basic Materials, and Real Estate also make up 0.07% less of the fund’s holdings compared to DIA (3.14% vs. 3.21%).

Holdings

IWF - Holdings

IWF HoldingsWeight
Apple Inc10.51%
Microsoft Corp9.85%
Amazon.com Inc6.63%
Facebook Inc Class A3.91%
Alphabet Inc Class A3.2%
Alphabet Inc Class C3.03%
Tesla Inc2.45%
NVIDIA Corp2.14%
Visa Inc Class A1.91%
The Home Depot Inc1.62%

IWF’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc Class A, and Alphabet Inc Class A at 10.51%, 9.85%, 6.63%, 3.91%, and 3.2%.

Alphabet Inc Class C (3.03%), Tesla Inc (2.45%), and NVIDIA Corp (2.14%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Visa Inc Class A and The Home Depot Inc are also represented in the IWF’s holdings at 1.91% and 1.62%.

DIA - Holdings

DIA HoldingsWeight
UnitedHealth Group Inc7.63%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc7.23%
The Home Depot Inc6.07%
Microsoft Corp5.16%
Salesforce.com Inc4.65%
Amgen Inc4.64%
Boeing Co4.56%
Visa Inc Class A4.45%
McDonald’s Corp4.4%
Honeywell International Inc4.18%

DIA’s Top Holdings are UnitedHealth Group Inc, Goldman Sachs Group Inc, The Home Depot Inc, Microsoft Corp, and Salesforce.com Inc at 7.63%, 7.23%, 6.07%, 5.16%, and 4.65%.

Amgen Inc (4.64%), Boeing Co (4.56%), and Visa Inc Class A (4.45%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. McDonald’s Corp and Honeywell International Inc are also represented in the DIA’s holdings at 4.4% and 4.18%.

NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).

Risk Analysis

IWFDIA
Mean Return1.481.13
R-squared92.9393.31
Std. Deviation14.4213.68
Alpha2.16-0.94
Beta1.030.97
Sharpe Ratio1.190.94
Treynor Ratio17.113.07

The iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) has a Sharpe Ratio of 1.19 with a Treynor Ratio of 17.1 and a Mean Return of 1.48. Its Alpha is 2.16 while IWF’s Standard Deviation is 14.42. Furthermore, the fund has a Beta of 1.03 and a R-squared of 92.93.

The SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) has a Beta of 0.97 with a Standard Deviation of 13.68 and a Alpha of -0.94. Its Sharpe Ratio is 0.94 while DIA’s R-squared is 93.31. Furthermore, the fund has a Mean Return of 1.13 and a Treynor Ratio of 13.07.

IWF’s Mean Return is 0.35 points higher than that of DIA and its R-squared is 0.38 points lower. With a Standard Deviation of 14.42, IWF is slightly more volatile than DIA. The Alpha and Beta of IWF are 3.10 points higher and 0.06 points higher than DIA’s Alpha and Beta.

FYI: Another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector is by investing in real estate debt. Groundfloor offers fantastic short-term, high-yield bonds that can add diversification to your portfolio!

Performance

Annual Returns

IWF vs. DIA - Annual Returns

YearIWFDIA
202038.21%9.63%
201936.08%25.09%
2018-1.68%-3.6%
201729.96%27.97%
20166.92%16.28%
20155.48%0.1%
201412.84%9.88%
201333.19%29.41%
201215.03%10.04%
20112.47%8.21%
201016.47%13.87%

IWF had its best year in 2020 with an annual return of 38.21%. IWF’s worst year over the past decade yielded -1.68% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2012, and 2010 where annual returns amounted to 12.84%, 15.03%, and 16.47% respectively.

The year 2013 was the strongest year for DIA, returning 29.41% on an annual basis. The poorest year for DIA in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -3.6%. Most years the SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust has given investors modest returns, such as in 2014, 2012, and 2010, when gains were 9.88%, 10.04%, and 13.87% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

IWF vs. DIA - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
IWF$10,000$55,92017.72%
DIA$10,000$37,96513.35%

A $10,000 investment in IWF would have resulted in a final balance of $55,920. This is a profit of $45,920 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17.72%.

With a $10,000 investment in DIA, the end total would have been $37,965. This equates to a $27,965 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.35%.

IWF’s CAGR is 4.37 percentage points higher than that of DIA and as a result, would have yielded $17,955 more on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IWF outperformed DIA by 4.37% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.