Skip to content

IWD vs. VHT: What’s The Difference?

The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) and the Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares (VHT) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IWD is a iShares Large Value fund and VHT is a Vanguard Health fund. So, what’s the difference between IWD and VHT? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of IWD is 0.09 percentage points higher than VHT’s (0.19% vs. 0.1%). IWD also has a higher exposure to the financial services sector and a higher standard deviation. Overall, IWD has provided lower returns than VHT over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare IWD vs. VHT. We’ll look at holdings and annual returns, as well as at their performance and fund composition. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IWD’s and VHT’s portfolio growth, industry exposure, and risk metrics and examine how these affect their overall returns.

TIP: Keep track of all your investments with Personal Capital. I use this amazing tool to aggregate all investments in one place and make sure I'm on track to financial freedom. Oh, and did I mention it's free? Try it out here (link to Personal Capital).

Summary

IWDVHT
NameiShares Russell 1000 Value ETFVanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares
CategoryLarge ValueHealth
IssueriSharesVanguard
AUM54.1B17.94B
Avg. Return11.40%16.04%
Div. Yield1.57%1.15%
Expense Ratio0.19%0.1%

The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) is a Large Value fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 54.1B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 11.40% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.57% with an expense ratio of 0.19%.

The Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares (VHT) is a Health fund that is issued by Vanguard. It currently has 17.94B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 16.04% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.15% with an expense ratio of 0.1%.

IWD’s dividend yield is 0.42% higher than that of VHT (1.57% vs. 1.15%). Also, IWD yielded on average 4.64% less per year over the past decade (11.40% vs. 16.04%). The expense ratio of IWD is 0.09 percentage points higher than VHT’s (0.19% vs. 0.1%).

FYI: The best way I've found to invest in ETFs is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

IWD vs. VHT - Industry Exposure

IWDVHT
Technology10.28%0.05%
Industrials11.77%0.05%
Energy4.76%0.0%
Communication Services8.67%0.0%
Utilities4.88%0.0%
Healthcare17.78%99.57%
Consumer Defensive7.76%0.0%
Real Estate4.94%0.0%
Financial Services20.43%0.02%
Consumer Cyclical5.62%0.0%
Basic Materials3.1%0.31%

The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) has the most exposure to the Financial Services sector at 20.43%. This is followed by Healthcare and Industrials at 17.78% and 11.77% respectively. Energy (4.76%), Utilities (4.88%), and Real Estate (4.94%) only make up 14.58% of the fund’s total assets.

IWD’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Cyclical, Consumer Defensive, Communication Services, Technology, and Industrials stocks at 5.62%, 7.76%, 8.67%, 10.28%, and 11.77%.

The Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares (VHT) has the most exposure to the Healthcare sector at 99.57%. This is followed by Basic Materials and Technology at 0.31% and 0.05% respectively. Real Estate (0.0%), Consumer Defensive (0.0%), and Utilities (0.0%) only make up 0.00% of the fund’s total assets.

VHT’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Communication Services, Energy, Financial Services, Industrials, and Technology stocks at 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.02%, 0.05%, and 0.05%.

IWD is 20.41% more exposed to the Financial Services sector than VHT (20.43% vs 0.02%). IWD’s exposure to Healthcare and Industrials stocks is 81.79% lower and 11.72% higher respectively (17.78% vs. 99.57% and 11.77% vs. 0.05%). In total, Energy, Utilities, and Real Estate also make up 14.58% more of the fund’s holdings compared to VHT (14.58% vs. 0.00%).

Holdings

IWD - Holdings

IWD HoldingsWeight
Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B2.58%
JPMorgan Chase & Co2.25%
Johnson & Johnson2.24%
UnitedHealth Group Inc1.78%
Procter & Gamble Co1.71%
The Walt Disney Co1.5%
Bank of America Corp1.43%
Comcast Corp Class A1.33%
Exxon Mobil Corp1.2%
Pfizer Inc1.18%

IWD’s Top Holdings are Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B, JPMorgan Chase & Co, Johnson & Johnson, UnitedHealth Group Inc, and Procter & Gamble Co at 2.58%, 2.25%, 2.24%, 1.78%, and 1.71%.

The Walt Disney Co (1.5%), Bank of America Corp (1.43%), and Comcast Corp Class A (1.33%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Exxon Mobil Corp and Pfizer Inc are also represented in the IWD’s holdings at 1.2% and 1.18%.

VHT - Holdings

VHT HoldingsWeight
Johnson & Johnson7.34%
UnitedHealth Group Inc6.44%
Pfizer Inc3.7%
Abbott Laboratories3.48%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc3.37%
AbbVie Inc3.37%
Merck & Co Inc3.33%
Eli Lilly and Co3.17%
Danaher Corp2.91%
Medtronic PLC2.83%

VHT’s Top Holdings are Johnson & Johnson, UnitedHealth Group Inc, Pfizer Inc, Abbott Laboratories, and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc at 7.34%, 6.44%, 3.7%, 3.48%, and 3.37%.

AbbVie Inc (3.37%), Merck & Co Inc (3.33%), and Eli Lilly and Co (3.17%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Danaher Corp and Medtronic PLC are also represented in the VHT’s holdings at 2.91% and 2.83%.

NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).

Risk Analysis

IWDVHT
Mean Return1.031.33
R-squared92.3859.86
Std. Deviation14.3513.58
Alpha-3.237.99
Beta1.020.75
Sharpe Ratio0.811.13
Treynor Ratio11.0620.74

The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) has a Standard Deviation of 14.35 with a Mean Return of 1.03 and a Alpha of -3.23. Its Beta is 1.02 while IWD’s R-squared is 92.38. Furthermore, the fund has a Sharpe Ratio of 0.81 and a Treynor Ratio of 11.06.

The Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares (VHT) has a Standard Deviation of 13.58 with a Mean Return of 1.33 and a Beta of 0.75. Its Alpha is 7.99 while VHT’s Treynor Ratio is 20.74. Furthermore, the fund has a Sharpe Ratio of 1.13 and a R-squared of 59.86.

IWD’s Mean Return is 0.30 points lower than that of VHT and its R-squared is 32.52 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 14.35, IWD is slightly more volatile than VHT. The Alpha and Beta of IWD are 11.22 points lower and 0.27 points higher than VHT’s Alpha and Beta.

FYI: Another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector is by investing in real estate debt. Groundfloor offers fantastic short-term, high-yield bonds that can add diversification to your portfolio!

Performance

Annual Returns

IWD vs. VHT - Annual Returns

YearIWDVHT
20202.67%18.21%
201926.34%21.97%
2018-8.4%5.55%
201713.47%23.34%
201617.09%-3.33%
2015-3.95%7.22%
201413.21%25.38%
201332.18%42.67%
201217.28%19.1%
20110.21%10.57%
201015.3%5.75%

IWD had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 32.18%. IWD’s worst year over the past decade yielded -8.4% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2017, and 2010 where annual returns amounted to 13.21%, 13.47%, and 15.3% respectively.

The year 2013 was the strongest year for VHT, returning 42.67% on an annual basis. The poorest year for VHT in the last ten years was 2016, with a yield of -3.33%. Most years the Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares has given investors modest returns, such as in 2011, 2020, and 2012, when gains were 10.57%, 18.21%, and 19.1% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

IWD vs. VHT - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
IWD$10,000$30,74611.40%
VHT$10,000$48,46416.04%

A $10,000 investment in IWD would have resulted in a final balance of $30,746. This is a profit of $20,746 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.40%.

With a $10,000 investment in VHT, the end total would have been $48,464. This equates to a $38,464 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 16.04%.

IWD’s CAGR is 4.64 percentage points lower than that of VHT and as a result, would have yielded $17,718 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IWD performed worse than VHT by 4.64% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.