Skip to content

IWD vs. MINT: What’s The Difference?

The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) and the PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINT) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IWD is a iShares Large Value fund and MINT is a PIMCO Ultrashort Bond fund. So, what’s the difference between IWD and MINT? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of IWD is 0.17 percentage points lower than MINT’s (0.19% vs. 0.36%). IWD also has a high exposure to the financial services sector while MINT is mostly comprised of Others bonds. Overall, IWD has provided higher returns than MINT over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare IWD vs. MINT. We’ll look at holdings and industry exposure, as well as at their fund composition and risk metrics. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IWD’s and MINT’s portfolio growth, annual returns, and performance and examine how these affect their overall returns.

Summary

IWDMINT
NameiShares Russell 1000 Value ETFPIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
CategoryLarge ValueUltrashort Bond
IssueriSharesPIMCO
AUM54.1B14.02B
Avg. Return11.40%1.52%
Div. Yield1.57%0.56%
Expense Ratio0.19%0.36%

The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) is a Large Value fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 54.1B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 11.40% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.57% with an expense ratio of 0.19%.

The PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINT) is a Ultrashort Bond fund that is issued by PIMCO. It currently has 14.02B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 1.52% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.56% with an expense ratio of 0.36%.

IWD’s dividend yield is 1.01% higher than that of MINT (1.57% vs. 0.56%). Also, IWD yielded on average 9.88% more per year over the past decade (11.40% vs. 1.52%). The expense ratio of IWD is 0.17 percentage points lower than MINT’s (0.19% vs. 0.36%).

Fund Composition

Holdings

IWD - Holdings

IWD HoldingsWeight
Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B2.58%
JPMorgan Chase & Co2.25%
Johnson & Johnson2.24%
UnitedHealth Group Inc1.78%
Procter & Gamble Co1.71%
The Walt Disney Co1.5%
Bank of America Corp1.43%
Comcast Corp Class A1.33%
Exxon Mobil Corp1.2%
Pfizer Inc1.18%

IWD’s Top Holdings are Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B, JPMorgan Chase & Co, Johnson & Johnson, UnitedHealth Group Inc, and Procter & Gamble Co at 2.58%, 2.25%, 2.24%, 1.78%, and 1.71%.

The Walt Disney Co (1.5%), Bank of America Corp (1.43%), and Comcast Corp Class A (1.33%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Exxon Mobil Corp and Pfizer Inc are also represented in the IWD’s holdings at 1.2% and 1.18%.

MINT - Holdings

MINT Bond SectorsWeight
Others0.0%
Below B0.0%
B0.0%
BB0.0%
BBB0.0%
A0.0%
AA0.0%
AAA0.0%
US Government0.0%

MINT’s Top Bond Sectors are ratings of Others, Below B, B, BB, and BBB at 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0%. The fund is less weighted towards A (0.0%), AA (0.0%), and AAA (0.0%) rated bonds.

Risk Analysis

IWDMINT
Mean Return1.030.12
R-squared92.384.7
Std. Deviation14.351.08
Alpha-3.230.62
Beta1.020.08
Sharpe Ratio0.810.78
Treynor Ratio11.0610.8

The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) has a R-squared of 92.38 with a Beta of 1.02 and a Treynor Ratio of 11.06. Its Sharpe Ratio is 0.81 while IWD’s Mean Return is 1.03. Furthermore, the fund has a Standard Deviation of 14.35 and a Alpha of -3.23.

The PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINT) has a Beta of 0.08 with a Mean Return of 0.12 and a R-squared of 4.7. Its Standard Deviation is 1.08 while MINT’s Alpha is 0.62. Furthermore, the fund has a Sharpe Ratio of 0.78 and a Treynor Ratio of 10.8.

IWD’s Mean Return is 0.91 points higher than that of MINT and its R-squared is 87.68 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 14.35, IWD is slightly more volatile than MINT. The Alpha and Beta of IWD are 3.85 points lower and 0.94 points higher than MINT’s Alpha and Beta.

Performance

Annual Returns

IWD vs. MINT - Annual Returns

YearIWDMINT
20202.67%1.63%
201926.34%3.3%
2018-8.4%1.72%
201713.47%1.9%
201617.09%1.99%
2015-3.95%0.52%
201413.21%0.53%
201332.18%0.72%
201217.28%2.48%
20110.21%0.42%
201015.3%1.72%

IWD had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 32.18%. IWD’s worst year over the past decade yielded -8.4% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2017, and 2010 where annual returns amounted to 13.21%, 13.47%, and 15.3% respectively.

The year 2019 was the strongest year for MINT, returning 3.3% on an annual basis. The poorest year for MINT in the last ten years was 2011, with a yield of 0.42%. Most years the PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund has given investors modest returns, such as in 2020, 2018, and 2010, when gains were 1.63%, 1.72%, and 1.72% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

IWD vs. MINT - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
IWD$10,000$26,66611.40%
MINT$10,000$11,6241.52%

A $10,000 investment in IWD would have resulted in a final balance of $26,666. This is a profit of $16,666 over 10 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.40%.

With a $10,000 investment in MINT, the end total would have been $11,624. This equates to a $1,624 profit over 10 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 1.52%.

IWD’s CAGR is 9.88 percentage points higher than that of MINT and as a result, would have yielded $15,042 more on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IWD outperformed MINT by 9.88% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Marvin Allen

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *