The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) and the iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IWD is a iShares Large Value fund and EFV is a iShares Foreign Large Value fund. So, what’s the difference between IWD and EFV? And which fund is better?
The expense ratio of IWD is 0.20 percentage points lower than EFV’s (0.19% vs. 0.39%). IWD also has a lower exposure to the financial services sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, IWD has provided higher returns than EFV over the past ten years.
In this article, we’ll compare IWD vs. EFV. We’ll look at risk metrics and industry exposure, as well as at their fund composition and holdings. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IWD’s and EFV’s portfolio growth, annual returns, and performance and examine how these affect their overall returns.
|Name||iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF||iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF|
|Category||Large Value||Foreign Large Value|
The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) is a Large Value fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 54.1B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 11.40% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.57% with an expense ratio of 0.19%.
The iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) is a Foreign Large Value fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 14.37B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 3.99% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 2.94% with an expense ratio of 0.39%.
IWD’s dividend yield is 1.37% lower than that of EFV (1.57% vs. 2.94%). Also, IWD yielded on average 7.41% more per year over the past decade (11.40% vs. 3.99%). The expense ratio of IWD is 0.20 percentage points lower than EFV’s (0.19% vs. 0.39%).
The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) has the most exposure to the Financial Services sector at 20.43%. This is followed by Healthcare and Industrials at 17.78% and 11.77% respectively. Energy (4.76%), Utilities (4.88%), and Real Estate (4.94%) only make up 14.58% of the fund’s total assets.
IWD’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Cyclical, Consumer Defensive, Communication Services, Technology, and Industrials stocks at 5.62%, 7.76%, 8.67%, 10.28%, and 11.77%.
The iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) has the most exposure to the Financial Services sector at 26.55%. This is followed by Industrials and Basic Materials at 11.6% and 9.59% respectively. Real Estate (5.06%), Utilities (6.14%), and Communication Services (6.46%) only make up 17.66% of the fund’s total assets.
EFV’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Energy, Consumer Defensive, Consumer Cyclical, Healthcare, and Basic Materials stocks at 6.6%, 6.82%, 9.0%, 9.19%, and 9.59%.
IWD is 6.12% less exposed to the Financial Services sector than EFV (20.43% vs 26.55%). IWD’s exposure to Healthcare and Industrials stocks is 8.59% higher and 0.17% higher respectively (17.78% vs. 9.19% and 11.77% vs. 11.6%). In total, Energy, Utilities, and Real Estate also make up 3.22% less of the fund’s holdings compared to EFV (14.58% vs. 17.80%).
|Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B||2.58%|
|JPMorgan Chase & Co||2.25%|
|Johnson & Johnson||2.24%|
|UnitedHealth Group Inc||1.78%|
|Procter & Gamble Co||1.71%|
|The Walt Disney Co||1.5%|
|Bank of America Corp||1.43%|
|Comcast Corp Class A||1.33%|
|Exxon Mobil Corp||1.2%|
IWD’s Top Holdings are Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B, JPMorgan Chase & Co, Johnson & Johnson, UnitedHealth Group Inc, and Procter & Gamble Co at 2.58%, 2.25%, 2.24%, 1.78%, and 1.71%.
The Walt Disney Co (1.5%), Bank of America Corp (1.43%), and Comcast Corp Class A (1.33%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Exxon Mobil Corp and Pfizer Inc are also represented in the IWD’s holdings at 1.2% and 1.18%.
|Toyota Motor Corp||2.21%|
|Commonwealth Bank of Australia||1.59%|
|HSBC Holdings PLC||1.4%|
|Rio Tinto PLC||1.1%|
EFV’s Top Holdings are Novartis AG, Toyota Motor Corp, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Siemens AG, and Sanofi SA at 2.41%, 2.21%, 1.59%, 1.45%, and 1.42%.
HSBC Holdings PLC (1.4%), TotalEnergies SE (1.35%), and Allianz SE (1.23%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Rio Tinto PLC are also represented in the EFV’s holdings at 1.18% and 1.1%.
The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) has a Beta of 1.02 with a Standard Deviation of 14.35 and a Alpha of -3.23. Its R-squared is 92.38 while IWD’s Treynor Ratio is 11.06. Furthermore, the fund has a Mean Return of 1.03 and a Sharpe Ratio of 0.81.
The iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) has a Alpha of -1.77 with a Mean Return of 0.42 and a R-squared of 92.15. Its Treynor Ratio is 2.92 while EFV’s Beta is 1.05. Furthermore, the fund has a Standard Deviation of 16.53 and a Sharpe Ratio of 0.26.
IWD’s Mean Return is 0.61 points higher than that of EFV and its R-squared is 0.23 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 14.35, IWD is slightly less volatile than EFV. The Alpha and Beta of IWD are 1.46 points lower and 0.03 points lower than EFV’s Alpha and Beta.
IWD had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 32.18%. IWD’s worst year over the past decade yielded -8.4% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2017, and 2010 where annual returns amounted to 13.21%, 13.47%, and 15.3% respectively.
The year 2013 was the strongest year for EFV, returning 22.61% on an annual basis. The poorest year for EFV in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -14.88%. Most years the iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2020, 2010, and 2016, when gains were -2.78%, 3.18%, and 4.87% respectively.
|Fund||Initial Balance||Final Balance||CAGR|
A $10,000 investment in IWD would have resulted in a final balance of $30,746. This is a profit of $20,746 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.40%.
With a $10,000 investment in EFV, the end total would have been $14,134. This equates to a $4,134 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.99%.
IWD’s CAGR is 7.41 percentage points higher than that of EFV and as a result, would have yielded $16,612 more on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IWD outperformed EFV by 7.41% annually.
Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:
P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!
1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!
2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!
3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).
4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.
5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!
To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.