Skip to content

IWB vs. VHT: What’s The Difference?

The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and the Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares (VHT) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IWB is a iShares Large Blend fund and VHT is a Vanguard Health fund. So, what’s the difference between IWB and VHT? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of IWB is 0.05 percentage points higher than VHT’s (0.15% vs. 0.1%). IWB also has a higher exposure to the technology sector and a higher standard deviation. Overall, IWB has provided lower returns than VHT over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare IWB vs. VHT. We’ll look at portfolio growth and holdings, as well as at their fund composition and industry exposure. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IWB’s and VHT’s annual returns, risk metrics, and performance and examine how these affect their overall returns.

TIP: Keep track of all your investments with Personal Capital. I use this amazing tool to aggregate all investments in one place and make sure I'm on track to financial freedom. Oh, and did I mention it's free? Try it out here (link to Personal Capital).

Summary

IWBVHT
NameiShares Russell 1000 ETFVanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares
CategoryLarge BlendHealth
IssueriSharesVanguard
AUM30.54B17.94B
Avg. Return14.64%16.04%
Div. Yield1.14%1.15%
Expense Ratio0.15%0.1%

The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 30.54B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 14.64% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.14% with an expense ratio of 0.15%.

The Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares (VHT) is a Health fund that is issued by Vanguard. It currently has 17.94B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 16.04% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.15% with an expense ratio of 0.1%.

IWB’s dividend yield is 0.01% lower than that of VHT (1.14% vs. 1.15%). Also, IWB yielded on average 1.40% less per year over the past decade (14.64% vs. 16.04%). The expense ratio of IWB is 0.05 percentage points higher than VHT’s (0.15% vs. 0.1%).

FYI: The best way I've found to invest in ETFs is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

IWB vs. VHT - Industry Exposure

IWBVHT
Technology25.33%0.05%
Industrials8.88%0.05%
Energy2.44%0.0%
Communication Services10.83%0.0%
Utilities2.36%0.0%
Healthcare13.35%99.57%
Consumer Defensive5.97%0.0%
Real Estate3.34%0.0%
Financial Services13.64%0.02%
Consumer Cyclical11.85%0.0%
Basic Materials2.02%0.31%

The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 25.33%. This is followed by Financial Services and Healthcare at 13.64% and 13.35% respectively. Utilities (2.36%), Energy (2.44%), and Real Estate (3.34%) only make up 8.14% of the fund’s total assets.

IWB’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Industrials, Communication Services, Consumer Cyclical, and Healthcare stocks at 5.97%, 8.88%, 10.83%, 11.85%, and 13.35%.

The Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares (VHT) has the most exposure to the Healthcare sector at 99.57%. This is followed by Basic Materials and Technology at 0.31% and 0.05% respectively. Real Estate (0.0%), Consumer Defensive (0.0%), and Utilities (0.0%) only make up 0.00% of the fund’s total assets.

VHT’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Communication Services, Energy, Financial Services, Industrials, and Technology stocks at 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.02%, 0.05%, and 0.05%.

IWB is 25.28% more exposed to the Technology sector than VHT (25.33% vs 0.05%). IWB’s exposure to Financial Services and Healthcare stocks is 13.62% higher and 86.22% lower respectively (13.64% vs. 0.02% and 13.35% vs. 99.57%). In total, Utilities, Energy, and Real Estate also make up 8.14% more of the fund’s holdings compared to VHT (8.14% vs. 0.00%).

Holdings

IWB - Holdings

IWB HoldingsWeight
Apple Inc5.45%
Microsoft Corp5.11%
Amazon.com Inc3.43%
Facebook Inc Class A2.03%
Alphabet Inc Class A1.93%
Alphabet Inc Class C1.82%
Tesla Inc1.27%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B1.24%
NVIDIA Corp1.11%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.09%

IWB’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc Class A, and Alphabet Inc Class A at 5.45%, 5.11%, 3.43%, 2.03%, and 1.93%.

Alphabet Inc Class C (1.82%), Tesla Inc (1.27%), and Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B (1.24%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. NVIDIA Corp and JPMorgan Chase & Co are also represented in the IWB’s holdings at 1.11% and 1.09%.

VHT - Holdings

VHT HoldingsWeight
Johnson & Johnson7.34%
UnitedHealth Group Inc6.44%
Pfizer Inc3.7%
Abbott Laboratories3.48%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc3.37%
AbbVie Inc3.37%
Merck & Co Inc3.33%
Eli Lilly and Co3.17%
Danaher Corp2.91%
Medtronic PLC2.83%

VHT’s Top Holdings are Johnson & Johnson, UnitedHealth Group Inc, Pfizer Inc, Abbott Laboratories, and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc at 7.34%, 6.44%, 3.7%, 3.48%, and 3.37%.

AbbVie Inc (3.37%), Merck & Co Inc (3.33%), and Eli Lilly and Co (3.17%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Danaher Corp and Medtronic PLC are also represented in the VHT’s holdings at 2.91% and 2.83%.

NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).

Risk Analysis

IWBVHT
Mean Return1.271.33
R-squared99.7359.86
Std. Deviation13.8713.58
Alpha-0.387.99
Beta1.020.75
Sharpe Ratio1.051.13
Treynor Ratio14.3120.74

The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) has a R-squared of 99.73 with a Mean Return of 1.27 and a Treynor Ratio of 14.31. Its Sharpe Ratio is 1.05 while IWB’s Beta is 1.02. Furthermore, the fund has a Standard Deviation of 13.87 and a Alpha of -0.38.

The Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares (VHT) has a Treynor Ratio of 20.74 with a Standard Deviation of 13.58 and a R-squared of 59.86. Its Sharpe Ratio is 1.13 while VHT’s Alpha is 7.99. Furthermore, the fund has a Mean Return of 1.33 and a Beta of 0.75.

IWB’s Mean Return is 0.06 points lower than that of VHT and its R-squared is 39.87 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 13.87, IWB is slightly more volatile than VHT. The Alpha and Beta of IWB are 8.37 points lower and 0.27 points higher than VHT’s Alpha and Beta.

FYI: Another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector is by investing in real estate debt. Groundfloor offers fantastic short-term, high-yield bonds that can add diversification to your portfolio!

Performance

Annual Returns

IWB vs. VHT - Annual Returns

YearIWBVHT
202020.8%18.21%
201931.26%21.97%
2018-4.91%5.55%
201721.53%23.34%
201611.91%-3.33%
20150.82%7.22%
201413.08%25.38%
201332.93%42.67%
201216.27%19.1%
20111.36%10.57%
201015.94%5.75%

IWB had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 32.93%. IWB’s worst year over the past decade yielded -4.91% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Russell 1000 ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2010, and 2012 where annual returns amounted to 13.08%, 15.94%, and 16.27% respectively.

The year 2013 was the strongest year for VHT, returning 42.67% on an annual basis. The poorest year for VHT in the last ten years was 2016, with a yield of -3.33%. Most years the Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares has given investors modest returns, such as in 2011, 2020, and 2012, when gains were 10.57%, 18.21%, and 19.1% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

IWB vs. VHT - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
IWB$10,000$42,46214.64%
VHT$10,000$48,46416.04%

A $10,000 investment in IWB would have resulted in a final balance of $42,462. This is a profit of $32,462 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.64%.

With a $10,000 investment in VHT, the end total would have been $48,464. This equates to a $38,464 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 16.04%.

IWB’s CAGR is 1.40 percentage points lower than that of VHT and as a result, would have yielded $6,002 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IWB performed worse than VHT by 1.40% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.