The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and the ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IWB is a iShares Large Blend fund and TQQQ is a ProShares Trading–Leveraged Equity fund. So, what’s the difference between IWB and TQQQ? And which fund is better?
The expense ratio of IWB is 0.80 percentage points lower than TQQQ’s (0.15% vs. 0.95%). IWB also has a higher exposure to the technology sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, IWB has provided lower returns than TQQQ over the past ten years.
In this article, we’ll compare IWB vs. TQQQ. We’ll look at annual returns and performance, as well as at their risk metrics and fund composition. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IWB’s and TQQQ’s industry exposure, holdings, and portfolio growth and examine how these affect their overall returns.
|Name||iShares Russell 1000 ETF||ProShares UltraPro QQQ|
|Category||Large Blend||Trading–Leveraged Equity|
The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 30.54B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 14.64% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.14% with an expense ratio of 0.15%.
The ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) is a Trading–Leveraged Equity fund that is issued by ProShares. It currently has 12.41B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 61.22% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.0% with an expense ratio of 0.95%.
IWB’s dividend yield is 1.14% higher than that of TQQQ (1.14% vs. 0.0%). Also, IWB yielded on average 46.59% less per year over the past decade (14.64% vs. 61.22%). The expense ratio of IWB is 0.80 percentage points lower than TQQQ’s (0.15% vs. 0.95%).
The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 25.33%. This is followed by Financial Services and Healthcare at 13.64% and 13.35% respectively. Utilities (2.36%), Energy (2.44%), and Real Estate (3.34%) only make up 8.14% of the fund’s total assets.
IWB’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Industrials, Communication Services, Consumer Cyclical, and Healthcare stocks at 5.97%, 8.88%, 10.83%, 11.85%, and 13.35%.
The ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 0.0%. This is followed by Industrials and Energy at 0.0% and 0.0% respectively. Consumer Cyclical (0.0%), Financial Services (0.0%), and Real Estate (0.0%) only make up 0.00% of the fund’s total assets.
TQQQ’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Healthcare, Utilities, Communication Services, and Energy stocks at 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0%.
IWB is 25.33% more exposed to the Technology sector than TQQQ (25.33% vs 0.0%). IWB’s exposure to Financial Services and Healthcare stocks is 13.64% higher and 13.35% higher respectively (13.64% vs. 0.0% and 13.35% vs. 0.0%). In total, Utilities, Energy, and Real Estate also make up 8.14% more of the fund’s holdings compared to TQQQ (8.14% vs. 0.00%).
|Facebook Inc Class A||2.03%|
|Alphabet Inc Class A||1.93%|
|Alphabet Inc Class C||1.82%|
|Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B||1.24%|
|JPMorgan Chase & Co||1.09%|
IWB’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc Class A, and Alphabet Inc Class A at 5.45%, 5.11%, 3.43%, 2.03%, and 1.93%.
Alphabet Inc Class C (1.82%), Tesla Inc (1.27%), and Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B (1.24%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. NVIDIA Corp and JPMorgan Chase & Co are also represented in the IWB’s holdings at 1.11% and 1.09%.
|Nasdaq 100 Index Swap Goldman Sachs International||45.11%|
|Nasdaq 100 Index Swap Societe Generale||44.73%|
|Nasdaq 100 Index Swap Bnp Paribas||38.05%|
|Nasdaq 100 Index Swap Bank Of America Na||31.53%|
|Nasdaq 100 Index Swap Citibank Na||31.49%|
|Nasdaq 100 Index Swap Jp Morgan Securities||26.2%|
|Nasdaq 100 Index Swap Credit Suisse International||5.9%|
TQQQ’s Top Holdings are Nasdaq 100 Index Swap Goldman Sachs International, Nasdaq 100 Index Swap Societe Generale, Nasdaq 100 Index Swap Bnp Paribas, Nasdaq 100 Index Swap Bank Of America Na, and Nasdaq 100 Index Swap Citibank Na at 45.11%, 44.73%, 38.05%, 31.53%, and 31.49%.
Nasdaq 100 Index Swap Jp Morgan Securities (26.2%), Apple Inc (7.49%), and Microsoft Corp (6.69%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Nasdaq 100 Index Swap Credit Suisse International and Amazon.com Inc are also represented in the TQQQ’s holdings at 5.9% and 5.68%.
The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) has a Mean Return of 1.27 with a Alpha of -0.38 and a R-squared of 99.73. Its Standard Deviation is 13.87 while IWB’s Beta is 1.02. Furthermore, the fund has a Sharpe Ratio of 1.05 and a Treynor Ratio of 14.31.
The ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a Standard Deviation of 50.08 with a Treynor Ratio of 15.65 and a Beta of 3.37. Its Sharpe Ratio is 1.1 while TQQQ’s Mean Return is 4.65. Furthermore, the fund has a R-squared of 83.64 and a Alpha of 7.29.
IWB’s Mean Return is 3.38 points lower than that of TQQQ and its R-squared is 16.09 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 13.87, IWB is slightly less volatile than TQQQ. The Alpha and Beta of IWB are 7.67 points lower and 2.35 points lower than TQQQ’s Alpha and Beta.
IWB had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 32.93%. IWB’s worst year over the past decade yielded -4.91% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Russell 1000 ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2010, and 2012 where annual returns amounted to 13.08%, 15.94%, and 16.27% respectively.
The year 2013 was the strongest year for TQQQ, returning 139.98% on an annual basis. The poorest year for TQQQ in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -19.65%. Most years the ProShares UltraPro QQQ has given investors modest returns, such as in 2015, 2012, and 2014, when gains were 17.41%, 51.95%, and 56.82% respectively.
|Fund||Initial Balance||Final Balance||CAGR|
A $10,000 investment in IWB would have resulted in a final balance of $36,624. This is a profit of $26,624 over 10 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.64%.
With a $10,000 investment in TQQQ, the end total would have been $593,012. This equates to a $583,012 profit over 10 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 61.22%.
IWB’s CAGR is 46.59 percentage points lower than that of TQQQ and as a result, would have yielded $556,388 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IWB performed worse than TQQQ by 46.59% annually.
Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:
P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!
1) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!
2) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).
3) If you are interested in crypto, check out Gemini. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to the growing crypto space and Gemini has just been a breeze to use. Once you register, make sure to also open an Active Trader account to buy crypto at the lowest fees on the market (just 0.03%!).
To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.