The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and the iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IWB is a iShares Large Blend fund and IVE is a iShares Large Value fund. So, what’s the difference between IWB and IVE? And which fund is better?
The expense ratio of IWB is 0.03 percentage points lower than IVE’s (0.15% vs. 0.18%). IWB also has a higher exposure to the technology sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, IWB has provided higher returns than IVE over the past ten years.
In this article, we’ll compare IWB vs. IVE. We’ll look at risk metrics and fund composition, as well as at their performance and annual returns. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IWB’s and IVE’s portfolio growth, industry exposure, and holdings and examine how these affect their overall returns.
FYI: Another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector is by investing in real estate debt. Groundfloor offers fantastic short-term, high-yield bonds that can add diversification to your portfolio!
Summary
| IWB | IVE | |
| Name | iShares Russell 1000 ETF | iShares S&P 500 Value ETF |
| Category | Large Blend | Large Value |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| AUM | 30.54B | 22.4B |
| Avg. Return | 14.64% | 11.68% |
| Div. Yield | 1.14% | 1.88% |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.18% |
The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 30.54B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 14.64% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.14% with an expense ratio of 0.15%.
The iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) is a Large Value fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 22.4B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 11.68% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.88% with an expense ratio of 0.18%.
IWB’s dividend yield is 0.74% lower than that of IVE (1.14% vs. 1.88%). Also, IWB yielded on average 2.95% more per year over the past decade (14.64% vs. 11.68%). The expense ratio of IWB is 0.03 percentage points lower than IVE’s (0.15% vs. 0.18%).
FYI: The best way I've found to invest is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit and 100$! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).
Fund Composition
Industry Exposure
| IWB | IVE | |
| Technology | 25.33% | 9.41% |
| Industrials | 8.88% | 12.19% |
| Energy | 2.44% | 5.43% |
| Communication Services | 10.83% | 6.4% |
| Utilities | 2.36% | 4.82% |
| Healthcare | 13.35% | 15.4% |
| Consumer Defensive | 5.97% | 9.23% |
| Real Estate | 3.34% | 4.38% |
| Financial Services | 13.64% | 22.06% |
| Consumer Cyclical | 11.85% | 7.68% |
| Basic Materials | 2.02% | 2.99% |
The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 25.33%. This is followed by Financial Services and Healthcare at 13.64% and 13.35% respectively. Utilities (2.36%), Energy (2.44%), and Real Estate (3.34%) only make up 8.14% of the fund’s total assets.
IWB’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Industrials, Communication Services, Consumer Cyclical, and Healthcare stocks at 5.97%, 8.88%, 10.83%, 11.85%, and 13.35%.
The iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) has the most exposure to the Financial Services sector at 22.06%. This is followed by Healthcare and Industrials at 15.4% and 12.19% respectively. Real Estate (4.38%), Utilities (4.82%), and Energy (5.43%) only make up 14.63% of the fund’s total assets.
IVE’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Communication Services, Consumer Cyclical, Consumer Defensive, Technology, and Industrials stocks at 6.4%, 7.68%, 9.23%, 9.41%, and 12.19%.
IWB is 15.92% more exposed to the Technology sector than IVE (25.33% vs 9.41%). IWB’s exposure to Financial Services and Healthcare stocks is 8.42% lower and 2.05% lower respectively (13.64% vs. 22.06% and 13.35% vs. 15.4%). In total, Utilities, Energy, and Real Estate also make up 6.49% less of the fund’s holdings compared to IVE (8.14% vs. 14.63%).
Holdings
| IWB Holdings | Weight |
| Apple Inc | 5.45% |
| Microsoft Corp | 5.11% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 3.43% |
| Facebook Inc Class A | 2.03% |
| Alphabet Inc Class A | 1.93% |
| Alphabet Inc Class C | 1.82% |
| Tesla Inc | 1.27% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B | 1.24% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 1.11% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co | 1.09% |
IWB’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc Class A, and Alphabet Inc Class A at 5.45%, 5.11%, 3.43%, 2.03%, and 1.93%.
Alphabet Inc Class C (1.82%), Tesla Inc (1.27%), and Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B (1.24%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. NVIDIA Corp and JPMorgan Chase & Co are also represented in the IWB’s holdings at 1.11% and 1.09%.
| IVE Holdings | Weight |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B | 3.05% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co | 2.65% |
| The Walt Disney Co | 1.85% |
| Bank of America Corp | 1.67% |
| Johnson & Johnson | 1.57% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp | 1.41% |
| Pfizer Inc | 1.38% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 1.35% |
| Verizon Communications Inc | 1.33% |
| Intel Corp | 1.25% |
IVE’s Top Holdings are Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B, JPMorgan Chase & Co, The Walt Disney Co, Bank of America Corp, and Johnson & Johnson at 3.05%, 2.65%, 1.85%, 1.67%, and 1.57%.
Exxon Mobil Corp (1.41%), Pfizer Inc (1.38%), and Cisco Systems Inc (1.35%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Verizon Communications Inc and Intel Corp are also represented in the IVE’s holdings at 1.33% and 1.25%.
Risk Analysis
| IWB | IVE | |
| Mean Return | 1.27 | 1.05 |
| R-squared | 99.73 | 92.08 |
| Std. Deviation | 13.87 | 14.3 |
| Alpha | -0.38 | -2.9 |
| Beta | 1.02 | 1.01 |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.05 | 0.83 |
| Treynor Ratio | 14.31 | 11.41 |
The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) has a R-squared of 99.73 with a Sharpe Ratio of 1.05 and a Treynor Ratio of 14.31. Its Standard Deviation is 13.87 while IWB’s Beta is 1.02. Furthermore, the fund has a Alpha of -0.38 and a Mean Return of 1.27.
The iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) has a Treynor Ratio of 11.41 with a Sharpe Ratio of 0.83 and a Standard Deviation of 14.3. Its R-squared is 92.08 while IVE’s Alpha is -2.9. Furthermore, the fund has a Mean Return of 1.05 and a Beta of 1.01.
IWB’s Mean Return is 0.22 points higher than that of IVE and its R-squared is 7.65 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 13.87, IWB is slightly less volatile than IVE. The Alpha and Beta of IWB are 2.52 points higher and 0.01 points higher than IVE’s Alpha and Beta.
NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).
Performance
Annual Returns
| Year | IWB | IVE |
| 2020 | 20.8% | 1.24% |
| 2019 | 31.26% | 31.71% |
| 2018 | -4.91% | -9.09% |
| 2017 | 21.53% | 15.19% |
| 2016 | 11.91% | 17.17% |
| 2015 | 0.82% | -3.24% |
| 2014 | 13.08% | 12.14% |
| 2013 | 32.93% | 31.69% |
| 2012 | 16.27% | 17.45% |
| 2011 | 1.36% | -0.63% |
| 2010 | 15.94% | 14.9% |
IWB had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 32.93%. IWB’s worst year over the past decade yielded -4.91% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Russell 1000 ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2010, and 2012 where annual returns amounted to 13.08%, 15.94%, and 16.27% respectively.
The year 2019 was the strongest year for IVE, returning 31.71% on an annual basis. The poorest year for IVE in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -9.09%. Most years the iShares S&P 500 Value ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2014, 2010, and 2017, when gains were 12.14%, 14.9%, and 15.19% respectively.
Portfolio Growth
| Fund | Initial Balance | Final Balance | CAGR |
| IWB | $10,000 | $42,462 | 14.64% |
| IVE | $10,000 | $31,350 | 11.68% |
A $10,000 investment in IWB would have resulted in a final balance of $42,462. This is a profit of $32,462 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.64%.
With a $10,000 investment in IVE, the end total would have been $31,350. This equates to a $21,350 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.68%.
IWB’s CAGR is 2.95 percentage points higher than that of IVE and as a result, would have yielded $11,112 more on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IWB outperformed IVE by 2.95% annually.
Current recommendations:
Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:
P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!
1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!
2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!
3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).
4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.
5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!
To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.
I believe that money is just a means to an end: to be free to spend your time as you wish, to maximize your positive impact on the world.
