The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) and the iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IWB is a iShares Large Blend fund and EMB is a iShares Emerging Markets Bond fund. So, what’s the difference between IWB and EMB? And which fund is better?
The expense ratio of IWB is 0.24 percentage points lower than EMB’s (0.15% vs. 0.39%). IWB also has a high exposure to the technology sector while EMB is mostly comprised of BBB bonds. Overall, IWB has provided higher returns than EMB over the past ten years.
In this article, we’ll compare IWB vs. EMB. We’ll look at holdings and industry exposure, as well as at their annual returns and performance. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IWB’s and EMB’s portfolio growth, fund composition, and risk metrics and examine how these affect their overall returns.
FYI: Another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector is by investing in real estate debt. Groundfloor offers fantastic short-term, high-yield bonds that can add diversification to your portfolio!
Summary
| IWB | EMB | |
| Name | iShares Russell 1000 ETF | iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF |
| Category | Large Blend | Emerging Markets Bond |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| AUM | 30.54B | 19.76B |
| Avg. Return | 14.64% | 6.43% |
| Div. Yield | 1.14% | 3.85% |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.39% |
The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 30.54B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 14.64% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.14% with an expense ratio of 0.15%.
The iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) is a Emerging Markets Bond fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 19.76B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 6.43% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 3.85% with an expense ratio of 0.39%.
IWB’s dividend yield is 2.71% lower than that of EMB (1.14% vs. 3.85%). Also, IWB yielded on average 8.20% more per year over the past decade (14.64% vs. 6.43%). The expense ratio of IWB is 0.24 percentage points lower than EMB’s (0.15% vs. 0.39%).
FYI: The best way I've found to invest is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit and 100$! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).
Fund Composition
Holdings
| IWB Holdings | Weight |
| Apple Inc | 5.45% |
| Microsoft Corp | 5.11% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 3.43% |
| Facebook Inc Class A | 2.03% |
| Alphabet Inc Class A | 1.93% |
| Alphabet Inc Class C | 1.82% |
| Tesla Inc | 1.27% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B | 1.24% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 1.11% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co | 1.09% |
IWB’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc Class A, and Alphabet Inc Class A at 5.45%, 5.11%, 3.43%, 2.03%, and 1.93%.
Alphabet Inc Class C (1.82%), Tesla Inc (1.27%), and Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B (1.24%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. NVIDIA Corp and JPMorgan Chase & Co are also represented in the IWB’s holdings at 1.11% and 1.09%.
| EMB Bond Sectors | Weight |
| BBB | 33.79% |
| B | 21.97% |
| BB | 16.92% |
| A | 13.67% |
| AA | 7.97% |
| Below B | 4.49% |
| Others | 1.11% |
| AAA | 0.09% |
| US Government | 0.0% |
EMB’s Top Bond Sectors are ratings of BBB, B, BB, A, and AA at 33.79%, 21.97%, 16.92%, 13.67%, and 7.97%. The fund is less weighted towards Below B (4.49%), Others (1.11%), and AAA (0.09%) rated bonds.
Risk Analysis
| IWB | EMB | |
| Mean Return | 1.27 | 0.44 |
| R-squared | 99.73 | 23.34 |
| Std. Deviation | 13.87 | 8.44 |
| Alpha | -0.38 | 0.89 |
| Beta | 1.02 | 1.36 |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.05 | 0.55 |
| Treynor Ratio | 14.31 | 3.24 |
The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) has a Alpha of -0.38 with a Beta of 1.02 and a R-squared of 99.73. Its Sharpe Ratio is 1.05 while IWB’s Standard Deviation is 13.87. Furthermore, the fund has a Mean Return of 1.27 and a Treynor Ratio of 14.31.
The iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) has a Standard Deviation of 8.44 with a Alpha of 0.89 and a Treynor Ratio of 3.24. Its Sharpe Ratio is 0.55 while EMB’s Beta is 1.36. Furthermore, the fund has a R-squared of 23.34 and a Mean Return of 0.44.
IWB’s Mean Return is 0.83 points higher than that of EMB and its R-squared is 76.39 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 13.87, IWB is slightly more volatile than EMB. The Alpha and Beta of IWB are 1.27 points lower and 0.34 points lower than EMB’s Alpha and Beta.
NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).
Performance
Annual Returns
| Year | IWB | EMB |
| 2020 | 20.8% | 5.48% |
| 2019 | 31.26% | 15.57% |
| 2018 | -4.91% | -5.67% |
| 2017 | 21.53% | 9.98% |
| 2016 | 11.91% | 9.41% |
| 2015 | 0.82% | 0.43% |
| 2014 | 13.08% | 6.69% |
| 2013 | 32.93% | -7.42% |
| 2012 | 16.27% | 17.64% |
| 2011 | 1.36% | 7.2% |
| 2010 | 15.94% | 11.47% |
IWB had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 32.93%. IWB’s worst year over the past decade yielded -4.91% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Russell 1000 ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2010, and 2012 where annual returns amounted to 13.08%, 15.94%, and 16.27% respectively.
The year 2012 was the strongest year for EMB, returning 17.64% on an annual basis. The poorest year for EMB in the last ten years was 2013, with a yield of -7.42%. Most years the iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2014, 2011, and 2016, when gains were 6.69%, 7.2%, and 9.41% respectively.
Portfolio Growth
| Fund | Initial Balance | Final Balance | CAGR |
| IWB | $10,000 | $42,462 | 14.64% |
| EMB | $10,000 | $19,295 | 6.43% |
A $10,000 investment in IWB would have resulted in a final balance of $42,462. This is a profit of $32,462 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.64%.
With a $10,000 investment in EMB, the end total would have been $19,295. This equates to a $9,295 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.43%.
IWB’s CAGR is 8.20 percentage points higher than that of EMB and as a result, would have yielded $23,167 more on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IWB outperformed EMB by 8.20% annually.
Current recommendations:
Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:
P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!
1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!
2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!
3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).
4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.
5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!
To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.
I believe that money is just a means to an end: to be free to spend your time as you wish, to maximize your positive impact on the world.
