The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and the iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IVV is a iShares Large Blend fund and IWF is a iShares Large Growth fund. So, what’s the difference between IVV and IWF? And which fund is better?
The expense ratio of IVV is 0.16 percentage points lower than IWF’s (0.03% vs. 0.19%). IVV also has a lower exposure to the technology sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, IVV has provided lower returns than IWF over the past ten years.
In this article, we’ll compare IVV vs. IWF. We’ll look at annual returns and portfolio growth, as well as at their fund composition and risk metrics. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IVV’s and IWF’s holdings, performance, and industry exposure and examine how these affect their overall returns.
Summary
| IVV | IWF | |
| Name | iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF |
| Category | Large Blend | Large Growth |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| AUM | 294.95B | 72.16B |
| Avg. Return | 14.48% | 17.72% |
| Div. Yield | 1.28% | 0.52% |
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.19% |
The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 294.95B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 14.48% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.28% with an expense ratio of 0.03%.
The iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) is a Large Growth fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 72.16B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 17.72% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.52% with an expense ratio of 0.19%.
IVV’s dividend yield is 0.76% higher than that of IWF (1.28% vs. 0.52%). Also, IVV yielded on average 3.25% less per year over the past decade (14.48% vs. 17.72%). The expense ratio of IVV is 0.16 percentage points lower than IWF’s (0.03% vs. 0.19%).
Fund Composition
Industry Exposure
| IVV | IWF | |
| Technology | 24.64% | 39.29% |
| Industrials | 8.73% | 6.19% |
| Energy | 2.55% | 0.28% |
| Communication Services | 11.24% | 12.82% |
| Utilities | 2.49% | 0.03% |
| Healthcare | 13.52% | 9.23% |
| Consumer Defensive | 6.34% | 4.31% |
| Real Estate | 2.63% | 1.85% |
| Financial Services | 13.86% | 7.36% |
| Consumer Cyclical | 11.74% | 17.62% |
| Basic Materials | 2.27% | 1.01% |
The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 24.64%. This is followed by Financial Services and Healthcare at 13.86% and 13.52% respectively. Utilities (2.49%), Energy (2.55%), and Real Estate (2.63%) only make up 7.67% of the fund’s total assets.
IVV’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Industrials, Communication Services, Consumer Cyclical, and Healthcare stocks at 6.34%, 8.73%, 11.24%, 11.74%, and 13.52%.
The iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 39.29%. This is followed by Consumer Cyclical and Communication Services at 17.62% and 12.82% respectively. Energy (0.28%), Basic Materials (1.01%), and Real Estate (1.85%) only make up 3.14% of the fund’s total assets.
IWF’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Industrials, Financial Services, Healthcare, and Communication Services stocks at 4.31%, 6.19%, 7.36%, 9.23%, and 12.82%.
IVV is 14.65% less exposed to the Technology sector than IWF (24.64% vs 39.29%). IVV’s exposure to Financial Services and Healthcare stocks is 6.50% higher and 4.29% higher respectively (13.86% vs. 7.36% and 13.52% vs. 9.23%). In total, Utilities, Energy, and Real Estate also make up 5.51% more of the fund’s holdings compared to IWF (7.67% vs. 2.16%).
Holdings
| IVV Holdings | Weight |
| Apple Inc | 6.14% |
| Microsoft Corp | 5.76% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 3.83% |
| Facebook Inc Class A | 2.29% |
| Alphabet Inc Class A | 2.17% |
| Alphabet Inc Class C | 2.07% |
| Tesla Inc | 1.42% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B | 1.42% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 1.3% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co | 1.23% |
IVV’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc Class A, and Alphabet Inc Class A at 6.14%, 5.76%, 3.83%, 2.29%, and 2.17%.
Alphabet Inc Class C (2.07%), Tesla Inc (1.42%), and Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B (1.42%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. NVIDIA Corp and JPMorgan Chase & Co are also represented in the IVV’s holdings at 1.3% and 1.23%.
| IWF Holdings | Weight |
| Apple Inc | 10.51% |
| Microsoft Corp | 9.85% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 6.63% |
| Facebook Inc Class A | 3.91% |
| Alphabet Inc Class A | 3.2% |
| Alphabet Inc Class C | 3.03% |
| Tesla Inc | 2.45% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 2.14% |
| Visa Inc Class A | 1.91% |
| The Home Depot Inc | 1.62% |
IWF’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc Class A, and Alphabet Inc Class A at 10.51%, 9.85%, 6.63%, 3.91%, and 3.2%.
Alphabet Inc Class C (3.03%), Tesla Inc (2.45%), and NVIDIA Corp (2.14%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Visa Inc Class A and The Home Depot Inc are also represented in the IWF’s holdings at 1.91% and 1.62%.
Performance
Annual Returns
| Year | IVV | IWF |
| 2020 | 18.37% | 38.21% |
| 2019 | 31.44% | 36.08% |
| 2018 | -4.42% | -1.68% |
| 2017 | 21.79% | 29.96% |
| 2016 | 11.9% | 6.92% |
| 2015 | 1.34% | 5.48% |
| 2014 | 13.62% | 12.84% |
| 2013 | 32.31% | 33.19% |
| 2012 | 15.91% | 15.03% |
| 2011 | 2.03% | 2.47% |
| 2010 | 14.96% | 16.47% |
IVV had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 32.31%. IVV’s worst year over the past decade yielded -4.42% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2010, and 2012 where annual returns amounted to 13.62%, 14.96%, and 15.91% respectively.
The year 2020 was the strongest year for IWF, returning 38.21% on an annual basis. The poorest year for IWF in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -1.68%. Most years the iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2014, 2012, and 2010, when gains were 12.84%, 15.03%, and 16.47% respectively.
Portfolio Growth
| Fund | Initial Balance | Final Balance | CAGR |
| IVV | $10,000 | $41,976 | 14.48% |
| IWF | $10,000 | $55,920 | 17.72% |
A $10,000 investment in IVV would have resulted in a final balance of $41,976. This is a profit of $31,976 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.48%.
With a $10,000 investment in IWF, the end total would have been $55,920. This equates to a $45,920 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17.72%.
IVV’s CAGR is 3.25 percentage points lower than that of IWF and as a result, would have yielded $13,944 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IVV performed worse than IWF by 3.25% annually.
Current recommendations:
Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:
P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!
1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!
2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!
3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).
4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.
5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!
To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.
I believe that money is just a means to an end: to be free to spend your time as you wish, to maximize your positive impact on the world.
