Skip to content

IVV vs. IWD: What’s The Difference?

The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IVV is a iShares Large Blend fund and IWD is a iShares Large Value fund. So, what’s the difference between IVV and IWD? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of IVV is 0.16 percentage points lower than IWD’s (0.03% vs. 0.19%). IVV also has a higher exposure to the technology sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, IVV has provided higher returns than IWD over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare IVV vs. IWD. We’ll look at risk metrics and performance, as well as at their industry exposure and holdings. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IVV’s and IWD’s annual returns, portfolio growth, and fund composition and examine how these affect their overall returns.

Summary

IVVIWD
NameiShares Core S&P 500 ETFiShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
CategoryLarge BlendLarge Value
IssueriSharesiShares
AUM294.95B54.1B
Avg. Return14.48%11.40%
Div. Yield1.28%1.57%
Expense Ratio0.03%0.19%

The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 294.95B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 14.48% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.28% with an expense ratio of 0.03%.

The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) is a Large Value fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 54.1B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 11.40% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.57% with an expense ratio of 0.19%.

IVV’s dividend yield is 0.29% lower than that of IWD (1.28% vs. 1.57%). Also, IVV yielded on average 3.08% more per year over the past decade (14.48% vs. 11.40%). The expense ratio of IVV is 0.16 percentage points lower than IWD’s (0.03% vs. 0.19%).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

IVV vs. IWD - Industry Exposure

IVVIWD
Technology24.64%10.28%
Industrials8.73%11.77%
Energy2.55%4.76%
Communication Services11.24%8.67%
Utilities2.49%4.88%
Healthcare13.52%17.78%
Consumer Defensive6.34%7.76%
Real Estate2.63%4.94%
Financial Services13.86%20.43%
Consumer Cyclical11.74%5.62%
Basic Materials2.27%3.1%

The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 24.64%. This is followed by Financial Services and Healthcare at 13.86% and 13.52% respectively. Utilities (2.49%), Energy (2.55%), and Real Estate (2.63%) only make up 7.67% of the fund’s total assets.

IVV’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Industrials, Communication Services, Consumer Cyclical, and Healthcare stocks at 6.34%, 8.73%, 11.24%, 11.74%, and 13.52%.

The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) has the most exposure to the Financial Services sector at 20.43%. This is followed by Healthcare and Industrials at 17.78% and 11.77% respectively. Energy (4.76%), Utilities (4.88%), and Real Estate (4.94%) only make up 14.58% of the fund’s total assets.

IWD’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Cyclical, Consumer Defensive, Communication Services, Technology, and Industrials stocks at 5.62%, 7.76%, 8.67%, 10.28%, and 11.77%.

IVV is 14.36% more exposed to the Technology sector than IWD (24.64% vs 10.28%). IVV’s exposure to Financial Services and Healthcare stocks is 6.57% lower and 4.26% lower respectively (13.86% vs. 20.43% and 13.52% vs. 17.78%). In total, Utilities, Energy, and Real Estate also make up 6.91% less of the fund’s holdings compared to IWD (7.67% vs. 14.58%).

Holdings

IVV - Holdings

IVV HoldingsWeight
Apple Inc6.14%
Microsoft Corp5.76%
Amazon.com Inc3.83%
Facebook Inc Class A2.29%
Alphabet Inc Class A2.17%
Alphabet Inc Class C2.07%
Tesla Inc1.42%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B1.42%
NVIDIA Corp1.3%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.23%

IVV’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc Class A, and Alphabet Inc Class A at 6.14%, 5.76%, 3.83%, 2.29%, and 2.17%.

Alphabet Inc Class C (2.07%), Tesla Inc (1.42%), and Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B (1.42%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. NVIDIA Corp and JPMorgan Chase & Co are also represented in the IVV’s holdings at 1.3% and 1.23%.

IWD - Holdings

IWD HoldingsWeight
Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B2.58%
JPMorgan Chase & Co2.25%
Johnson & Johnson2.24%
UnitedHealth Group Inc1.78%
Procter & Gamble Co1.71%
The Walt Disney Co1.5%
Bank of America Corp1.43%
Comcast Corp Class A1.33%
Exxon Mobil Corp1.2%
Pfizer Inc1.18%

IWD’s Top Holdings are Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B, JPMorgan Chase & Co, Johnson & Johnson, UnitedHealth Group Inc, and Procter & Gamble Co at 2.58%, 2.25%, 2.24%, 1.78%, and 1.71%.

The Walt Disney Co (1.5%), Bank of America Corp (1.43%), and Comcast Corp Class A (1.33%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Exxon Mobil Corp and Pfizer Inc are also represented in the IWD’s holdings at 1.2% and 1.18%.

Performance

Annual Returns

IVV vs. IWD - Annual Returns

YearIVVIWD
202018.37%2.67%
201931.44%26.34%
2018-4.42%-8.4%
201721.79%13.47%
201611.9%17.09%
20151.34%-3.95%
201413.62%13.21%
201332.31%32.18%
201215.91%17.28%
20112.03%0.21%
201014.96%15.3%

IVV had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 32.31%. IVV’s worst year over the past decade yielded -4.42% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2010, and 2012 where annual returns amounted to 13.62%, 14.96%, and 15.91% respectively.

The year 2013 was the strongest year for IWD, returning 32.18% on an annual basis. The poorest year for IWD in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -8.4%. Most years the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2014, 2017, and 2010, when gains were 13.21%, 13.47%, and 15.3% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

IVV vs. IWD - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
IVV$10,000$41,97614.48%
IWD$10,000$30,74611.40%

A $10,000 investment in IVV would have resulted in a final balance of $41,976. This is a profit of $31,976 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.48%.

With a $10,000 investment in IWD, the end total would have been $30,746. This equates to a $20,746 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.40%.

IVV’s CAGR is 3.08 percentage points higher than that of IWD and as a result, would have yielded $11,230 more on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IVV outperformed IWD by 3.08% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

9125d72911bdc1f2dd2d1918a15aaf4c?s=250&d=mm&r=g

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *