Skip to content

IVV vs. IJH: What’s The Difference?

The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and the iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IVV is a iShares Large Blend fund and IJH is a iShares Mid-Cap Blend fund. So, what’s the difference between IVV and IJH? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of IVV is 0.02 percentage points lower than IJH’s (0.03% vs. 0.05%). IVV also has a higher exposure to the technology sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, IVV has provided higher returns than IJH over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare IVV vs. IJH. We’ll look at performance and risk metrics, as well as at their portfolio growth and fund composition. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IVV’s and IJH’s holdings, industry exposure, and annual returns and examine how these affect their overall returns.

Summary

IVVIJH
NameiShares Core S&P 500 ETFiShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
CategoryLarge BlendMid-Cap Blend
IssueriSharesiShares
AUM294.95B63.4B
Avg. Return14.48%13.50%
Div. Yield1.28%1.07%
Expense Ratio0.03%0.05%

The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 294.95B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 14.48% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.28% with an expense ratio of 0.03%.

The iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) is a Mid-Cap Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 63.4B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 13.50% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.07% with an expense ratio of 0.05%.

IVV’s dividend yield is 0.21% higher than that of IJH (1.28% vs. 1.07%). Also, IVV yielded on average 0.98% more per year over the past decade (14.48% vs. 13.50%). The expense ratio of IVV is 0.02 percentage points lower than IJH’s (0.03% vs. 0.05%).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

IVV vs. IJH - Industry Exposure

IVVIJH
Technology24.64%14.81%
Industrials8.73%18.09%
Energy2.55%2.5%
Communication Services11.24%1.57%
Utilities2.49%2.9%
Healthcare13.52%10.89%
Consumer Defensive6.34%4.02%
Real Estate2.63%10.04%
Financial Services13.86%14.85%
Consumer Cyclical11.74%14.91%
Basic Materials2.27%5.42%

The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 24.64%. This is followed by Financial Services and Healthcare at 13.86% and 13.52% respectively. Utilities (2.49%), Energy (2.55%), and Real Estate (2.63%) only make up 7.67% of the fund’s total assets.

IVV’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Industrials, Communication Services, Consumer Cyclical, and Healthcare stocks at 6.34%, 8.73%, 11.24%, 11.74%, and 13.52%.

The iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) has the most exposure to the Industrials sector at 18.09%. This is followed by Consumer Cyclical and Financial Services at 14.91% and 14.85% respectively. Energy (2.5%), Utilities (2.9%), and Consumer Defensive (4.02%) only make up 9.42% of the fund’s total assets.

IJH’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Basic Materials, Real Estate, Healthcare, Technology, and Financial Services stocks at 5.42%, 10.04%, 10.89%, 14.81%, and 14.85%.

IVV is 9.83% more exposed to the Technology sector than IJH (24.64% vs 14.81%). IVV’s exposure to Financial Services and Healthcare stocks is 0.99% lower and 2.63% higher respectively (13.86% vs. 14.85% and 13.52% vs. 10.89%). In total, Utilities, Energy, and Real Estate also make up 7.77% less of the fund’s holdings compared to IJH (7.67% vs. 15.44%).

Holdings

IVV - Holdings

IVV HoldingsWeight
Apple Inc6.14%
Microsoft Corp5.76%
Amazon.com Inc3.83%
Facebook Inc Class A2.29%
Alphabet Inc Class A2.17%
Alphabet Inc Class C2.07%
Tesla Inc1.42%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B1.42%
NVIDIA Corp1.3%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.23%

IVV’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc Class A, and Alphabet Inc Class A at 6.14%, 5.76%, 3.83%, 2.29%, and 2.17%.

Alphabet Inc Class C (2.07%), Tesla Inc (1.42%), and Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B (1.42%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. NVIDIA Corp and JPMorgan Chase & Co are also represented in the IVV’s holdings at 1.3% and 1.23%.

IJH - Holdings

IJH HoldingsWeight
Bio-Techne Corp0.8%
Molina Healthcare Inc0.68%
Cognex Corp0.68%
Fair Isaac Corp0.64%
Camden Property Trust0.62%
XPO Logistics Inc0.6%
Masimo Corp0.59%
SolarEdge Technologies Inc0.57%
FactSet Research Systems Inc0.57%
Graco Inc0.56%

IJH’s Top Holdings are Bio-Techne Corp, Molina Healthcare Inc, Cognex Corp, Fair Isaac Corp, and Camden Property Trust at 0.8%, 0.68%, 0.68%, 0.64%, and 0.62%.

XPO Logistics Inc (0.6%), Masimo Corp (0.59%), and SolarEdge Technologies Inc (0.57%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. FactSet Research Systems Inc and Graco Inc are also represented in the IJH’s holdings at 0.57% and 0.56%.

Performance

Annual Returns

IVV vs. IJH - Annual Returns

YearIVVIJH
202018.37%13.61%
201931.44%26.14%
2018-4.42%-11.14%
201721.79%16.19%
201611.9%20.63%
20151.34%-2.23%
201413.62%9.64%
201332.31%33.4%
201215.91%17.76%
20112.03%-1.89%
201014.96%26.38%

IVV had its best year in 2013 with an annual return of 32.31%. IVV’s worst year over the past decade yielded -4.42% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2010, and 2012 where annual returns amounted to 13.62%, 14.96%, and 15.91% respectively.

The year 2013 was the strongest year for IJH, returning 33.4% on an annual basis. The poorest year for IJH in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -11.14%. Most years the iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2020, 2017, and 2012, when gains were 13.61%, 16.19%, and 17.76% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

IVV vs. IJH - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
IVV$10,000$41,97614.48%
IJH$10,000$37,26613.50%

A $10,000 investment in IVV would have resulted in a final balance of $41,976. This is a profit of $31,976 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.48%.

With a $10,000 investment in IJH, the end total would have been $37,266. This equates to a $27,266 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.50%.

IVV’s CAGR is 0.98 percentage points higher than that of IJH and as a result, would have yielded $4,710 more on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IVV outperformed IJH by 0.98% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

9125d72911bdc1f2dd2d1918a15aaf4c?s=250&d=mm&r=g

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *