The iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and the iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IEMG is a iShares Diversified Emerging Mkts fund and IWB is a iShares Large Blend fund. So, what’s the difference between IEMG and IWB? And which fund is better?
The expense ratio of IEMG is 0.04 percentage points lower than IWB’s (0.11% vs. 0.15%). IEMG also has a lower exposure to the technology sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, IEMG has provided lower returns than IWB over the past ten years.
In this article, we’ll compare IEMG vs. IWB. We’ll look at annual returns and fund composition, as well as at their holdings and portfolio growth. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IEMG’s and IWB’s industry exposure, performance, and risk metrics and examine how these affect their overall returns.
|Name||iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF||iShares Russell 1000 ETF|
|Category||Diversified Emerging Mkts||Large Blend|
The iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) is a Diversified Emerging Mkts fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 83.68B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 7.41% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.78% with an expense ratio of 0.11%.
The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 30.54B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 14.64% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.14% with an expense ratio of 0.15%.
IEMG’s dividend yield is 0.64% higher than that of IWB (1.78% vs. 1.14%). Also, IEMG yielded on average 7.23% less per year over the past decade (7.41% vs. 14.64%). The expense ratio of IEMG is 0.04 percentage points lower than IWB’s (0.11% vs. 0.15%).
The iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 20.44%. This is followed by Financial Services and Consumer Cyclical at 16.9% and 15.67% respectively. Real Estate (2.75%), Energy (4.71%), and Consumer Defensive (5.68%) only make up 13.14% of the fund’s total assets.
IEMG’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Healthcare, Industrials, Basic Materials, Communication Services, and Consumer Cyclical stocks at 5.73%, 5.92%, 8.64%, 11.41%, and 15.67%.
The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 25.33%. This is followed by Financial Services and Healthcare at 13.64% and 13.35% respectively. Utilities (2.36%), Energy (2.44%), and Real Estate (3.34%) only make up 8.14% of the fund’s total assets.
IWB’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Industrials, Communication Services, Consumer Cyclical, and Healthcare stocks at 5.97%, 8.88%, 10.83%, 11.85%, and 13.35%.
IEMG is 4.89% less exposed to the Technology sector than IWB (20.44% vs 25.33%). IEMG’s exposure to Financial Services and Consumer Cyclical stocks is 3.26% higher and 3.82% higher respectively (16.9% vs. 13.64% and 15.67% vs. 11.85%). In total, Real Estate, Energy, and Consumer Defensive also make up 1.39% more of the fund’s holdings compared to IWB (13.14% vs. 11.75%).
|Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd||5.37%|
|Tencent Holdings Ltd||4.42%|
|Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares||4.38%|
|Samsung Electronics Co Ltd||3.49%|
|Naspers Ltd Class N||0.93%|
|Reliance Industries Ltd Shs Dematerialised||0.83%|
|China Construction Bank Corp Class H||0.77%|
IEMG’s Top Holdings are Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd, Tencent Holdings Ltd, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares, Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, and Meituan at 5.37%, 4.42%, 4.38%, 3.49%, and 1.52%.
Naspers Ltd Class N (0.93%), Vale SA (0.91%), and Reliance Industries Ltd Shs Dematerialised (0.83%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. China Construction Bank Corp Class H and Infosys Ltd are also represented in the IEMG’s holdings at 0.77% and 0.74%.
|Facebook Inc Class A||2.03%|
|Alphabet Inc Class A||1.93%|
|Alphabet Inc Class C||1.82%|
|Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B||1.24%|
|JPMorgan Chase & Co||1.09%|
IWB’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc Class A, and Alphabet Inc Class A at 5.45%, 5.11%, 3.43%, 2.03%, and 1.93%.
Alphabet Inc Class C (1.82%), Tesla Inc (1.27%), and Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B (1.24%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. NVIDIA Corp and JPMorgan Chase & Co are also represented in the IWB’s holdings at 1.11% and 1.09%.
The iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a Sharpe Ratio of 0 with a Mean Return of 0 and a R-squared of 0. Its Treynor Ratio is 0 while IEMG’s Standard Deviation is 0. Furthermore, the fund has a Beta of 0 and a Alpha of 0.
The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) has a Mean Return of 1.27 with a Sharpe Ratio of 1.05 and a Treynor Ratio of 14.31. Its Alpha is -0.38 while IWB’s Beta is 1.02. Furthermore, the fund has a R-squared of 99.73 and a Standard Deviation of 13.87.
IEMG’s Mean Return is 1.27 points lower than that of IWB and its R-squared is 99.73 points lower. With a Standard Deviation of 0, IEMG is slightly less volatile than IWB. The Alpha and Beta of IEMG are 0.38 points higher and 1.02 points lower than IWB’s Alpha and Beta.
IEMG had its best year in 2017 with an annual return of 36.78%. IEMG’s worst year over the past decade yielded -14.69% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2012, 2011, and 2010 where annual returns amounted to 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0% respectively.
The year 2013 was the strongest year for IWB, returning 32.93% on an annual basis. The poorest year for IWB in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -4.91%. Most years the iShares Russell 1000 ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2014, 2010, and 2012, when gains were 13.08%, 15.94%, and 16.27% respectively.
|Fund||Initial Balance||Final Balance||CAGR|
A $10,000 investment in IEMG would have resulted in a final balance of $15,037. This is a profit of $5,037 over 7 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.41%.
With a $10,000 investment in IWB, the end total would have been $23,378. This equates to a $13,378 profit over 7 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.64%.
IEMG’s CAGR is 7.23 percentage points lower than that of IWB and as a result, would have yielded $8,341 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IEMG performed worse than IWB by 7.23% annually.
Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:
P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!
1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!
2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!
3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).
4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.
5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!
To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.