The iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and the SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IEMG is a iShares Diversified Emerging Mkts fund and GLD is a SPDR State Street Global Advisors N/A fund. So, what’s the difference between IEMG and GLD? And which fund is better?
The expense ratio of IEMG is 0.29 percentage points lower than GLD’s (0.11% vs. 0.4%). IEMG also has a higher exposure to the technology sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, IEMG has provided higher returns than GLD over the past ten years.
In this article, we’ll compare IEMG vs. GLD. We’ll look at portfolio growth and risk metrics, as well as at their performance and fund composition. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IEMG’s and GLD’s annual returns, industry exposure, and holdings and examine how these affect their overall returns.
|Name||iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF||SPDR Gold Shares|
|Category||Diversified Emerging Mkts||N/A|
|Issuer||iShares||SPDR State Street Global Advisors|
The iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) is a Diversified Emerging Mkts fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 83.68B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 7.41% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.78% with an expense ratio of 0.11%.
The SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) is a N/A fund that is issued by SPDR State Street Global Advisors. It currently has 59.26B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 5.81% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.0% with an expense ratio of 0.4%.
IEMG’s dividend yield is 1.78% higher than that of GLD (1.78% vs. 0.0%). Also, IEMG yielded on average 1.60% more per year over the past decade (7.41% vs. 5.81%). The expense ratio of IEMG is 0.29 percentage points lower than GLD’s (0.11% vs. 0.4%).
FYI: The best way I've found to invest in ETFs is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).
The iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 20.44%. This is followed by Financial Services and Consumer Cyclical at 16.9% and 15.67% respectively. Real Estate (2.75%), Energy (4.71%), and Consumer Defensive (5.68%) only make up 13.14% of the fund’s total assets.
IEMG’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Healthcare, Industrials, Basic Materials, Communication Services, and Consumer Cyclical stocks at 5.73%, 5.92%, 8.64%, 11.41%, and 15.67%.
The SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 0.0%. This is followed by Industrials and Energy at 0.0% and 0.0% respectively. Consumer Cyclical (0.0%), Financial Services (0.0%), and Real Estate (0.0%) only make up 0.00% of the fund’s total assets.
GLD’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Healthcare, Utilities, Communication Services, and Energy stocks at 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0%.
IEMG is 20.44% more exposed to the Technology sector than GLD (20.44% vs 0.0%). IEMG’s exposure to Financial Services and Consumer Cyclical stocks is 16.90% higher and 15.67% higher respectively (16.9% vs. 0.0% and 15.67% vs. 0.0%). In total, Real Estate, Energy, and Consumer Defensive also make up 13.14% more of the fund’s holdings compared to GLD (13.14% vs. 0.00%).
|Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd||5.37%|
|Tencent Holdings Ltd||4.42%|
|Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares||4.38%|
|Samsung Electronics Co Ltd||3.49%|
|Naspers Ltd Class N||0.93%|
|Reliance Industries Ltd Shs Dematerialised||0.83%|
|China Construction Bank Corp Class H||0.77%|
IEMG’s Top Holdings are Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd, Tencent Holdings Ltd, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares, Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, and Meituan at 5.37%, 4.42%, 4.38%, 3.49%, and 1.52%.
Naspers Ltd Class N (0.93%), Vale SA (0.91%), and Reliance Industries Ltd Shs Dematerialised (0.83%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. China Construction Bank Corp Class H and Infosys Ltd are also represented in the IEMG’s holdings at 0.77% and 0.74%.
GLD’s Top Holdings are Gold Trust, N/A, N/A, N/A, and N/A at 100.0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, and 0%.
N/A (0%), N/A (0%), and N/A (0%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. N/A and N/A are also represented in the GLD’s holdings at 0% and 0%.
NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).
The iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a Beta of 0 with a Sharpe Ratio of 0 and a Treynor Ratio of 0. Its Mean Return is 0 while IEMG’s Standard Deviation is 0. Furthermore, the fund has a Alpha of 0 and a R-squared of 0.
The SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a Mean Return of 0.21 with a Beta of 0.48 and a Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. Its Standard Deviation is 16.58 while GLD’s R-squared is 16.21. Furthermore, the fund has a Treynor Ratio of 1.21 and a Alpha of 3.91.
IEMG’s Mean Return is 0.21 points lower than that of GLD and its R-squared is 16.21 points lower. With a Standard Deviation of 0, IEMG is slightly less volatile than GLD. The Alpha and Beta of IEMG are 3.91 points lower and 0.48 points lower than GLD’s Alpha and Beta.
BTW: Uncorrelated crypto assets such as Bitcoin can serve as a hedge and mitigate risk. I've allocated around 5% of my portfolio to crypto assets through Coinbase - the simplest and cheapest broker I've found! Click here to read more (link to Coinbase).
IEMG had its best year in 2017 with an annual return of 36.78%. IEMG’s worst year over the past decade yielded -14.69% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2012, 2011, and 2010 where annual returns amounted to 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0% respectively.
The year 2010 was the strongest year for GLD, returning 27.25% on an annual basis. The poorest year for GLD in the last ten years was 2013, with a yield of -28.09%. Most years the SPDR Gold Shares has given investors modest returns, such as in 2012, 2016, and 2011, when gains were 5.26%, 8.69%, and 11.2% respectively.
|Fund||Initial Balance||Final Balance||CAGR|
A $10,000 investment in IEMG would have resulted in a final balance of $15,037. This is a profit of $5,037 over 7 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.41%.
With a $10,000 investment in GLD, the end total would have been $15,308. This equates to a $5,308 profit over 7 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.81%.
IEMG’s CAGR is 1.60 percentage points higher than that of GLD and as a result, would have yielded $271 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IEMG outperformed GLD by 1.60% annually.
Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:
P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!
1) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!
2) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).
3) If you are interested in crypto, check out Coinbase. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to the growing crypto space and Coinbase has just been a breeze to use. Once you register, make sure to also open an Coinbase Pro account to buy crypto at the lowest fees on the market (just 0.1%!).
To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.