The iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IEMG is a iShares Diversified Emerging Mkts fund and EEM is a iShares Diversified Emerging Mkts fund. So, what’s the difference between IEMG and EEM? And which fund is better?
The expense ratio of IEMG is 0.57 percentage points lower than EEM’s (0.11% vs. 0.68%). IEMG also has a lower exposure to the technology sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, IEMG has provided higher returns than EEM over the past ten years.
In this article, we’ll compare IEMG vs. EEM. We’ll look at performance and holdings, as well as at their risk metrics and annual returns. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IEMG’s and EEM’s industry exposure, portfolio growth, and fund composition and examine how these affect their overall returns.
|Name||iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF||iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF|
|Category||Diversified Emerging Mkts||Diversified Emerging Mkts|
The iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) is a Diversified Emerging Mkts fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 83.68B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 7.41% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.78% with an expense ratio of 0.11%.
The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) is a Diversified Emerging Mkts fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 30.33B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 5.47% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.48% with an expense ratio of 0.68%.
IEMG’s dividend yield is 0.30% higher than that of EEM (1.78% vs. 1.48%). Also, IEMG yielded on average 1.94% more per year over the past decade (7.41% vs. 5.47%). The expense ratio of IEMG is 0.57 percentage points lower than EEM’s (0.11% vs. 0.68%).
The iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 20.44%. This is followed by Financial Services and Consumer Cyclical at 16.9% and 15.67% respectively. Real Estate (2.75%), Energy (4.71%), and Consumer Defensive (5.68%) only make up 13.14% of the fund’s total assets.
IEMG’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Healthcare, Industrials, Basic Materials, Communication Services, and Consumer Cyclical stocks at 5.73%, 5.92%, 8.64%, 11.41%, and 15.67%.
The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 21.36%. This is followed by Financial Services and Consumer Cyclical at 18.39% and 15.16% respectively. Utilities (1.99%), Industrials (4.61%), and Healthcare (5.06%) only make up 11.66% of the fund’s total assets.
EEM’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Energy, Consumer Defensive, Basic Materials, Communication Services, and Consumer Cyclical stocks at 5.17%, 5.45%, 9.07%, 11.76%, and 15.16%.
IEMG is 0.92% less exposed to the Technology sector than EEM (20.44% vs 21.36%). IEMG’s exposure to Financial Services and Consumer Cyclical stocks is 1.49% lower and 0.51% higher respectively (16.9% vs. 18.39% and 15.67% vs. 15.16%). In total, Real Estate, Energy, and Consumer Defensive also make up 0.54% more of the fund’s holdings compared to EEM (13.14% vs. 12.60%).
|Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd||5.37%|
|Tencent Holdings Ltd||4.42%|
|Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares||4.38%|
|Samsung Electronics Co Ltd||3.49%|
|Naspers Ltd Class N||0.93%|
|Reliance Industries Ltd Shs Dematerialised||0.83%|
|China Construction Bank Corp Class H||0.77%|
IEMG’s Top Holdings are Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd, Tencent Holdings Ltd, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares, Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, and Meituan at 5.37%, 4.42%, 4.38%, 3.49%, and 1.52%.
Naspers Ltd Class N (0.93%), Vale SA (0.91%), and Reliance Industries Ltd Shs Dematerialised (0.83%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. China Construction Bank Corp Class H and Infosys Ltd are also represented in the IEMG’s holdings at 0.77% and 0.74%.
|Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd||6.36%|
|Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares||4.58%|
|Tencent Holdings Ltd||4.41%|
|Samsung Electronics Co Ltd||4.05%|
|Naspers Ltd Class N||1.04%|
|Reliance Industries Ltd Shs Dematerialised||0.97%|
|China Construction Bank Corp Class H||0.83%|
EEM’s Top Holdings are Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares, Tencent Holdings Ltd, Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, and Meituan at 6.36%, 4.58%, 4.41%, 4.05%, and 1.24%.
Vale SA (1.04%), Naspers Ltd Class N (1.04%), and Reliance Industries Ltd Shs Dematerialised (0.97%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Infosys Ltd and China Construction Bank Corp Class H are also represented in the EEM’s holdings at 0.92% and 0.83%.
The iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a Beta of 0 with a Mean Return of 0 and a Treynor Ratio of 0. Its R-squared is 0 while IEMG’s Standard Deviation is 0. Furthermore, the fund has a Sharpe Ratio of 0 and a Alpha of 0.
The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a Treynor Ratio of 2.22 with a Sharpe Ratio of 0.22 and a Alpha of -2.33. Its R-squared is 83.5 while EEM’s Beta is 1.08. Furthermore, the fund has a Standard Deviation of 17.79 and a Mean Return of 0.38.
IEMG’s Mean Return is 0.38 points lower than that of EEM and its R-squared is 83.50 points lower. With a Standard Deviation of 0, IEMG is slightly less volatile than EEM. The Alpha and Beta of IEMG are 2.33 points higher and 1.08 points lower than EEM’s Alpha and Beta.
IEMG had its best year in 2017 with an annual return of 36.78%. IEMG’s worst year over the past decade yielded -14.69% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2012, 2011, and 2010 where annual returns amounted to 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0% respectively.
The year 2017 was the strongest year for EEM, returning 36.42% on an annual basis. The poorest year for EEM in the last ten years was 2011, with a yield of -18.87%. Most years the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2014, 2016, and 2010, when gains were -2.82%, 10.51%, and 15.93% respectively.
|Fund||Initial Balance||Final Balance||CAGR|
A $10,000 investment in IEMG would have resulted in a final balance of $15,037. This is a profit of $5,037 over 7 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.41%.
With a $10,000 investment in EEM, the end total would have been $14,575. This equates to a $4,575 profit over 7 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.47%.
IEMG’s CAGR is 1.94 percentage points higher than that of EEM and as a result, would have yielded $462 more on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IEMG outperformed EEM by 1.94% annually.
Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:
P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!
1) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!
2) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).
3) If you are interested in crypto, check out Gemini. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to the growing crypto space and Gemini has just been a breeze to use. Once you register, make sure to also open an Active Trader account to buy crypto at the lowest fees on the market (just 0.03%!).
To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.