Skip to content

IEFA vs. XLC: What’s The Difference?

The iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and the Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IEFA is a iShares Foreign Large Blend fund and XLC is a SPDR State Street Global Advisors Communications fund. So, what’s the difference between IEFA and XLC? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of IEFA is 0.05 percentage points lower than XLC’s (0.07% vs. 0.12%). IEFA also has a higher exposure to the industrials sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, IEFA has provided lower returns than XLC over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare IEFA vs. XLC. We’ll look at portfolio growth and fund composition, as well as at their annual returns and industry exposure. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IEFA’s and XLC’s performance, risk metrics, and holdings and examine how these affect their overall returns.

Summary

IEFAXLC
NameiShares Core MSCI EAFE ETFCommunication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
CategoryForeign Large BlendCommunications
IssueriSharesSPDR State Street Global Advisors
AUM95.78B14.09B
Avg. Return5.79%29.04%
Div. Yield2.28%0.62%
Expense Ratio0.07%0.12%

The iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) is a Foreign Large Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 95.78B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 5.79% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 2.28% with an expense ratio of 0.07%.

The Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) is a Communications fund that is issued by SPDR State Street Global Advisors. It currently has 14.09B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 29.04% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.62% with an expense ratio of 0.12%.

IEFA’s dividend yield is 1.66% higher than that of XLC (2.28% vs. 0.62%). Also, IEFA yielded on average 23.25% less per year over the past decade (5.79% vs. 29.04%). The expense ratio of IEFA is 0.05 percentage points lower than XLC’s (0.07% vs. 0.12%).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

IEFA vs. XLC - Industry Exposure

IEFAXLC
Technology9.81%0.0%
Industrials16.32%0.0%
Energy3.19%0.0%
Communication Services5.53%100.0%
Utilities3.25%0.0%
Healthcare12.01%0.0%
Consumer Defensive9.78%0.0%
Real Estate4.31%0.0%
Financial Services15.91%0.0%
Consumer Cyclical11.96%0.0%
Basic Materials7.93%0.0%

The iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) has the most exposure to the Industrials sector at 16.32%. This is followed by Financial Services and Healthcare at 15.91% and 12.01% respectively. Utilities (3.25%), Real Estate (4.31%), and Communication Services (5.53%) only make up 13.09% of the fund’s total assets.

IEFA’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Basic Materials, Consumer Defensive, Technology, Consumer Cyclical, and Healthcare stocks at 7.93%, 9.78%, 9.81%, 11.96%, and 12.01%.

The Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) has the most exposure to the Communication Services sector at 100.0%. This is followed by Technology and Industrials at 0.0% and 0.0% respectively. Consumer Cyclical (0.0%), Financial Services (0.0%), and Real Estate (0.0%) only make up 0.00% of the fund’s total assets.

XLC’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Healthcare, Utilities, Energy, and Industrials stocks at 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0%.

IEFA is 16.32% more exposed to the Industrials sector than XLC (16.32% vs 0.0%). IEFA’s exposure to Financial Services and Healthcare stocks is 15.91% higher and 12.01% higher respectively (15.91% vs. 0.0% and 12.01% vs. 0.0%). In total, Utilities, Real Estate, and Communication Services also make up 86.91% less of the fund’s holdings compared to XLC (13.09% vs. 100.00%).

Holdings

IEFA - Holdings

IEFA HoldingsWeight
Nestle SA1.77%
ASML Holding NV1.43%
Roche Holding AG1.31%
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE1.08%
Novartis AG1.0%
Toyota Motor Corp0.92%
AstraZeneca PLC0.78%
Unilever PLC0.76%
AIA Group Ltd0.74%
SAP SE0.73%

IEFA’s Top Holdings are Nestle SA, ASML Holding NV, Roche Holding AG, LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE, and Novartis AG at 1.77%, 1.43%, 1.31%, 1.08%, and 1.0%.

Toyota Motor Corp (0.92%), AstraZeneca PLC (0.78%), and Unilever PLC (0.76%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. AIA Group Ltd and SAP SE are also represented in the IEFA’s holdings at 0.74% and 0.73%.

XLC - Holdings

XLC HoldingsWeight
Facebook Inc A23.75%
Alphabet Inc A11.49%
Alphabet Inc Class C11.16%
Netflix Inc4.78%
Charter Communications Inc A4.65%
Comcast Corp Class A4.44%
T-Mobile US Inc4.41%
The Walt Disney Co4.39%
AT&T Inc4.35%
Verizon Communications Inc4.33%

XLC’s Top Holdings are Facebook Inc A, Alphabet Inc A, Alphabet Inc Class C, Netflix Inc, and Charter Communications Inc A at 23.75%, 11.49%, 11.16%, 4.78%, and 4.65%.

Comcast Corp Class A (4.44%), T-Mobile US Inc (4.41%), and The Walt Disney Co (4.39%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. AT&T Inc and Verizon Communications Inc are also represented in the XLC’s holdings at 4.35% and 4.33%.

Performance

Annual Returns

IEFA vs. XLC - Annual Returns

YearIEFAXLC
20208.55%26.85%
201922.67%31.22%
2018-14.2%0.0%
201726.42%0.0%
20161.36%0.0%
20150.53%0.0%
2014-4.82%0.0%
201323.73%0.0%
20120.0%0.0%
20110.0%0.0%
20100.0%0.0%

IEFA had its best year in 2017 with an annual return of 26.42%. IEFA’s worst year over the past decade yielded -14.2% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2010, 2015, and 2016 where annual returns amounted to 0.0%, 0.53%, and 1.36% respectively.

The year 2019 was the strongest year for XLC, returning 31.22% on an annual basis. The poorest year for XLC in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of 0.0%. Most years the Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund has given investors modest returns, such as in 2014, 2013, and 2012, when gains were 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

IEFA vs. XLC - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
IEFA$10,000$13,3155.79%
XLC$10,000$16,64529.04%

A $10,000 investment in IEFA would have resulted in a final balance of $13,315. This is a profit of $3,315 over 2 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.79%.

With a $10,000 investment in XLC, the end total would have been $16,645. This equates to a $6,645 profit over 2 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 29.04%.

IEFA’s CAGR is 23.25 percentage points lower than that of XLC and as a result, would have yielded $3,330 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IEFA performed worse than XLC by 23.25% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Marvin Allen

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *