Skip to content

IEFA vs. MINT: What’s The Difference?

The iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and the PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINT) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IEFA is a iShares Foreign Large Blend fund and MINT is a PIMCO Ultrashort Bond fund. So, what’s the difference between IEFA and MINT? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of IEFA is 0.29 percentage points lower than MINT’s (0.07% vs. 0.36%). IEFA also has a high exposure to the industrials sector while MINT is mostly comprised of Others bonds. Overall, IEFA has provided higher returns than MINT over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare IEFA vs. MINT. We’ll look at performance and fund composition, as well as at their industry exposure and risk metrics. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IEFA’s and MINT’s holdings, portfolio growth, and annual returns and examine how these affect their overall returns.

Summary

IEFAMINT
NameiShares Core MSCI EAFE ETFPIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
CategoryForeign Large BlendUltrashort Bond
IssueriSharesPIMCO
AUM95.78B14.02B
Avg. Return5.79%1.52%
Div. Yield2.28%0.56%
Expense Ratio0.07%0.36%

The iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) is a Foreign Large Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 95.78B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 5.79% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 2.28% with an expense ratio of 0.07%.

The PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINT) is a Ultrashort Bond fund that is issued by PIMCO. It currently has 14.02B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 1.52% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.56% with an expense ratio of 0.36%.

IEFA’s dividend yield is 1.72% higher than that of MINT (2.28% vs. 0.56%). Also, IEFA yielded on average 4.27% more per year over the past decade (5.79% vs. 1.52%). The expense ratio of IEFA is 0.29 percentage points lower than MINT’s (0.07% vs. 0.36%).

Fund Composition

Holdings

IEFA - Holdings

IEFA HoldingsWeight
Nestle SA1.77%
ASML Holding NV1.43%
Roche Holding AG1.31%
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE1.08%
Novartis AG1.0%
Toyota Motor Corp0.92%
AstraZeneca PLC0.78%
Unilever PLC0.76%
AIA Group Ltd0.74%
SAP SE0.73%

IEFA’s Top Holdings are Nestle SA, ASML Holding NV, Roche Holding AG, LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE, and Novartis AG at 1.77%, 1.43%, 1.31%, 1.08%, and 1.0%.

Toyota Motor Corp (0.92%), AstraZeneca PLC (0.78%), and Unilever PLC (0.76%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. AIA Group Ltd and SAP SE are also represented in the IEFA’s holdings at 0.74% and 0.73%.

MINT - Holdings

MINT Bond SectorsWeight
Others0.0%
Below B0.0%
B0.0%
BB0.0%
BBB0.0%
A0.0%
AA0.0%
AAA0.0%
US Government0.0%

MINT’s Top Bond Sectors are ratings of Others, Below B, B, BB, and BBB at 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0%. The fund is less weighted towards A (0.0%), AA (0.0%), and AAA (0.0%) rated bonds.

Performance

Annual Returns

IEFA vs. MINT - Annual Returns

YearIEFAMINT
20208.55%1.63%
201922.67%3.3%
2018-14.2%1.72%
201726.42%1.9%
20161.36%1.99%
20150.53%0.52%
2014-4.82%0.53%
201323.73%0.72%
20120.0%2.48%
20110.0%0.42%
20100.0%1.72%

IEFA had its best year in 2017 with an annual return of 26.42%. IEFA’s worst year over the past decade yielded -14.2% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2010, 2015, and 2016 where annual returns amounted to 0.0%, 0.53%, and 1.36% respectively.

The year 2019 was the strongest year for MINT, returning 3.3% on an annual basis. The poorest year for MINT in the last ten years was 2011, with a yield of 0.42%. Most years the PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund has given investors modest returns, such as in 2020, 2018, and 2010, when gains were 1.63%, 1.72%, and 1.72% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

IEFA vs. MINT - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
IEFA$10,000$14,0085.79%
MINT$10,000$11,2151.52%

A $10,000 investment in IEFA would have resulted in a final balance of $14,008. This is a profit of $4,008 over 7 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.79%.

With a $10,000 investment in MINT, the end total would have been $11,215. This equates to a $1,215 profit over 7 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 1.52%.

IEFA’s CAGR is 4.27 percentage points higher than that of MINT and as a result, would have yielded $2,793 more on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IEFA outperformed MINT by 4.27% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Marvin Allen

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *