Skip to content

IEFA vs. IWN: What’s The Difference?

The iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and the iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IEFA is a iShares Foreign Large Blend fund and IWN is a iShares Small Value fund. So, what’s the difference between IEFA and IWN? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of IEFA is 0.17 percentage points lower than IWN’s (0.07% vs. 0.24%). IEFA also has a higher exposure to the industrials sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, IEFA has provided lower returns than IWN over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare IEFA vs. IWN. We’ll look at industry exposure and performance, as well as at their fund composition and annual returns. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IEFA’s and IWN’s portfolio growth, risk metrics, and holdings and examine how these affect their overall returns.

Summary

IEFAIWN
NameiShares Core MSCI EAFE ETFiShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
CategoryForeign Large BlendSmall Value
IssueriSharesiShares
AUM95.78B15.48B
Avg. Return5.79%10.96%
Div. Yield2.28%1.26%
Expense Ratio0.07%0.24%

The iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) is a Foreign Large Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 95.78B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 5.79% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 2.28% with an expense ratio of 0.07%.

The iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) is a Small Value fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 15.48B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 10.96% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.26% with an expense ratio of 0.24%.

IEFA’s dividend yield is 1.02% higher than that of IWN (2.28% vs. 1.26%). Also, IEFA yielded on average 5.17% less per year over the past decade (5.79% vs. 10.96%). The expense ratio of IEFA is 0.17 percentage points lower than IWN’s (0.07% vs. 0.24%).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

IEFA vs. IWN - Industry Exposure

IEFAIWN
Technology9.81%6.02%
Industrials16.32%14.58%
Energy3.19%5.84%
Communication Services5.53%4.17%
Utilities3.25%4.69%
Healthcare12.01%10.94%
Consumer Defensive9.78%3.77%
Real Estate4.31%14.36%
Financial Services15.91%22.97%
Consumer Cyclical11.96%8.39%
Basic Materials7.93%4.29%

The iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) has the most exposure to the Industrials sector at 16.32%. This is followed by Financial Services and Healthcare at 15.91% and 12.01% respectively. Utilities (3.25%), Real Estate (4.31%), and Communication Services (5.53%) only make up 13.09% of the fund’s total assets.

IEFA’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Basic Materials, Consumer Defensive, Technology, Consumer Cyclical, and Healthcare stocks at 7.93%, 9.78%, 9.81%, 11.96%, and 12.01%.

The iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) has the most exposure to the Financial Services sector at 22.97%. This is followed by Industrials and Real Estate at 14.58% and 14.36% respectively. Communication Services (4.17%), Basic Materials (4.29%), and Utilities (4.69%) only make up 13.15% of the fund’s total assets.

IWN’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Energy, Technology, Consumer Cyclical, Healthcare, and Real Estate stocks at 5.84%, 6.02%, 8.39%, 10.94%, and 14.36%.

IEFA is 1.74% more exposed to the Industrials sector than IWN (16.32% vs 14.58%). IEFA’s exposure to Financial Services and Healthcare stocks is 7.06% lower and 1.07% higher respectively (15.91% vs. 22.97% and 12.01% vs. 10.94%). In total, Utilities, Real Estate, and Communication Services also make up 10.13% less of the fund’s holdings compared to IWN (13.09% vs. 23.22%).

Holdings

IEFA - Holdings

IEFA HoldingsWeight
Nestle SA1.77%
ASML Holding NV1.43%
Roche Holding AG1.31%
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE1.08%
Novartis AG1.0%
Toyota Motor Corp0.92%
AstraZeneca PLC0.78%
Unilever PLC0.76%
AIA Group Ltd0.74%
SAP SE0.73%

IEFA’s Top Holdings are Nestle SA, ASML Holding NV, Roche Holding AG, LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE, and Novartis AG at 1.77%, 1.43%, 1.31%, 1.08%, and 1.0%.

Toyota Motor Corp (0.92%), AstraZeneca PLC (0.78%), and Unilever PLC (0.76%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. AIA Group Ltd and SAP SE are also represented in the IEFA’s holdings at 0.74% and 0.73%.

IWN - Holdings

IWN HoldingsWeight
AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc Class A1.06%
Tenet Healthcare Corp0.47%
Stag Industrial Inc0.47%
Ovintiv Inc0.45%
EMCOR Group Inc0.42%
Valley National Bancorp0.37%
Chesapeake Energy Corp Ordinary Shares – New0.37%
Agree Realty Corp0.36%
Macy’s Inc0.35%
Essent Group Ltd0.35%

IWN’s Top Holdings are AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc Class A, Tenet Healthcare Corp, Stag Industrial Inc, Ovintiv Inc, and EMCOR Group Inc at 1.06%, 0.47%, 0.47%, 0.45%, and 0.42%.

Valley National Bancorp (0.37%), Chesapeake Energy Corp Ordinary Shares – New (0.37%), and Agree Realty Corp (0.36%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Macy’s Inc and Essent Group Ltd are also represented in the IWN’s holdings at 0.35% and 0.35%.

Performance

Annual Returns

IEFA vs. IWN - Annual Returns

YearIEFAIWN
20208.55%4.5%
201922.67%22.17%
2018-14.2%-12.94%
201726.42%7.73%
20161.36%31.64%
20150.53%-7.53%
2014-4.82%4.13%
201323.73%34.3%
20120.0%17.92%
20110.0%-5.64%
20100.0%24.29%

IEFA had its best year in 2017 with an annual return of 26.42%. IEFA’s worst year over the past decade yielded -14.2% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2010, 2015, and 2016 where annual returns amounted to 0.0%, 0.53%, and 1.36% respectively.

The year 2013 was the strongest year for IWN, returning 34.3% on an annual basis. The poorest year for IWN in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -12.94%. Most years the iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2020, 2017, and 2012, when gains were 4.5%, 7.73%, and 17.92% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

IEFA vs. IWN - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
IEFA$10,000$14,0085.79%
IWN$10,000$15,17710.96%

A $10,000 investment in IEFA would have resulted in a final balance of $14,008. This is a profit of $4,008 over 7 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.79%.

With a $10,000 investment in IWN, the end total would have been $15,177. This equates to a $5,177 profit over 7 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.96%.

IEFA’s CAGR is 5.17 percentage points lower than that of IWN and as a result, would have yielded $1,169 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IEFA performed worse than IWN by 5.17% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Marvin Allen

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *