The iShares Gold Trust (IAU) and the iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. IAU is a iShares N/A fund and ACWI is a iShares N/A fund. So, what’s the difference between IAU and ACWI? And which fund is better?
The expense ratio of IAU is 0.07 percentage points lower than ACWI’s (0.25% vs. 0.32%). IAU also has a lower exposure to the technology sector and a higher standard deviation. Overall, IAU has provided lower returns than ACWI over the past 11 years.
In this article, we’ll compare IAU vs. ACWI. We’ll look at risk metrics and industry exposure, as well as at their annual returns and portfolio growth. Moreover, I’ll also discuss IAU’s and ACWI’s performance, holdings, and fund composition and examine how these affect their overall returns.
|Name||iShares Gold Trust||iShares MSCI ACWI ETF|
The iShares Gold Trust (IAU) is a N/A fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 28.61B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 6.03% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.0% with an expense ratio of 0.25%.
The iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) is a N/A fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 16.85B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 10.21% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.39% with an expense ratio of 0.32%.
IAU’s dividend yield is 1.39% lower than that of ACWI (0.0% vs. 1.39%). Also, IAU yielded on average 4.18% less per year over the past decade (6.03% vs. 10.21%). The expense ratio of IAU is 0.07 percentage points lower than ACWI’s (0.25% vs. 0.32%).
FYI: The best way I've found to invest in ETFs is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).
The iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 0.0%. This is followed by Industrials and Energy at 0.0% and 0.0% respectively. Consumer Cyclical (0.0%), Financial Services (0.0%), and Real Estate (0.0%) only make up 0.00% of the fund’s total assets.
IAU’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Healthcare, Utilities, Communication Services, and Energy stocks at 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0%.
The iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 20.41%. This is followed by Financial Services and Consumer Cyclical at 15.58% and 12.01% respectively. Real Estate (2.75%), Energy (3.48%), and Basic Materials (4.73%) only make up 10.96% of the fund’s total assets.
ACWI’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Industrials, Communication Services, Healthcare, and Consumer Cyclical stocks at 7.15%, 9.65%, 9.87%, 11.74%, and 12.01%.
IAU is 20.41% less exposed to the Technology sector than ACWI (0.0% vs 20.41%). IAU’s exposure to Industrials and Energy stocks is 9.65% lower and 3.48% lower respectively (0.0% vs. 9.65% and 0.0% vs. 3.48%). In total, Consumer Cyclical, Financial Services, and Real Estate also make up 30.34% less of the fund’s holdings compared to ACWI (0.00% vs. 30.34%).
IAU’s Top Holdings are Gold, N/A, N/A, N/A, and N/A at 100.0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, and 0%.
N/A (0%), N/A (0%), and N/A (0%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. N/A and N/A are also represented in the IAU’s holdings at 0% and 0%.
|Facebook Inc A||1.25%|
|Alphabet Inc Class C||1.12%|
|Alphabet Inc A||1.09%|
|Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd||0.79%|
|JPMorgan Chase & Co||0.71%|
ACWI’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc A, and Alphabet Inc Class C at 3.44%, 2.91%, 2.21%, 1.25%, and 1.12%.
Alphabet Inc A (1.09%), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd (0.79%), and Tesla Inc (0.78%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. NVIDIA Corp and JPMorgan Chase & Co are also represented in the ACWI’s holdings at 0.74% and 0.71%.
NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).
The iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a R-squared of 16.03 with a Mean Return of 0.23 and a Beta of 0.48. Its Treynor Ratio is 1.5 while IAU’s Alpha is 4.16. Furthermore, the fund has a Sharpe Ratio of 0.13 and a Standard Deviation of 16.97.
The iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a Standard Deviation of 14.05 with a Beta of 1 and a R-squared of 99.96. Its Mean Return is 0.89 while ACWI’s Sharpe Ratio is 0.71. Furthermore, the fund has a Treynor Ratio of 9.45 and a Alpha of 0.15.
IAU’s Mean Return is 0.66 points lower than that of ACWI and its R-squared is 83.93 points lower. With a Standard Deviation of 16.97, IAU is slightly more volatile than ACWI. The Alpha and Beta of IAU are 4.01 points higher and 0.52 points lower than ACWI’s Alpha and Beta.
BTW: Uncorrelated crypto assets such as Bitcoin can serve as a hedge and mitigate risk. I've allocated around 5% of my portfolio to crypto assets through Coinbase - the simplest and cheapest broker I've found! Click here to read more (link to Coinbase).
IAU had its best year in 2010 with an annual return of 27.93%. IAU’s worst year over the past decade yielded -27.96% and occurred in 2013. In most years the iShares Gold Trust provided moderate returns such as in 2012, 2011, and 2016 where annual returns amounted to 8.37%, 8.66%, and 8.85% respectively.
The year 2019 was the strongest year for ACWI, returning 26.7% on an annual basis. The poorest year for ACWI in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -9.15%. Most years the iShares MSCI ACWI ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2016, 2010, and 2012, when gains were 8.22%, 12.31%, and 15.99% respectively.
|Fund||Initial Balance||Final Balance||CAGR|
A $10,000 investment in IAU would have resulted in a final balance of $16,786. This is a profit of $6,786 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.03%.
With a $10,000 investment in ACWI, the end total would have been $27,241. This equates to a $17,241 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.21%.
IAU’s CAGR is 4.18 percentage points lower than that of ACWI and as a result, would have yielded $10,455 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, IAU performed worse than ACWI by 4.18% annually.
Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:
P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!
1) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!
2) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).
3) If you are interested in crypto, check out Coinbase. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to the growing crypto space and Coinbase has just been a breeze to use. Once you register, make sure to also open an Coinbase Pro account to buy crypto at the lowest fees on the market (just 0.1%!).
To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.