The SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and the iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. GLD is a SPDR State Street Global Advisors N/A fund and EMB is a iShares Emerging Markets Bond fund. So, what’s the difference between GLD and EMB? And which fund is better?
The expense ratio of GLD is 0.01 percentage points higher than EMB’s (0.4% vs. 0.39%). GLD also has a high exposure to the technology sector while EMB is mostly comprised of BBB bonds. Overall, GLD has provided lower returns than EMB over the past ten years.
In this article, we’ll compare GLD vs. EMB. We’ll look at annual returns and portfolio growth, as well as at their performance and holdings. Moreover, I’ll also discuss GLD’s and EMB’s industry exposure, fund composition, and risk metrics and examine how these affect their overall returns.
|Name||SPDR Gold Shares||iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF|
|Category||N/A||Emerging Markets Bond|
|Issuer||SPDR State Street Global Advisors||iShares|
The SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) is a N/A fund that is issued by SPDR State Street Global Advisors. It currently has 59.26B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 5.81% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 0.0% with an expense ratio of 0.4%.
The iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) is a Emerging Markets Bond fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 19.76B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 6.43% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 3.85% with an expense ratio of 0.39%.
GLD’s dividend yield is 3.85% lower than that of EMB (0.0% vs. 3.85%). Also, GLD yielded on average 0.63% less per year over the past decade (5.81% vs. 6.43%). The expense ratio of GLD is 0.01 percentage points higher than EMB’s (0.4% vs. 0.39%).
GLD’s Top Holdings are Gold Trust, N/A, N/A, N/A, and N/A at 100.0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, and 0%.
N/A (0%), N/A (0%), and N/A (0%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. N/A and N/A are also represented in the GLD’s holdings at 0% and 0%.
|EMB Bond Sectors||Weight|
EMB’s Top Bond Sectors are ratings of BBB, B, BB, A, and AA at 33.79%, 21.97%, 16.92%, 13.67%, and 7.97%. The fund is less weighted towards Below B (4.49%), Others (1.11%), and AAA (0.09%) rated bonds.
The SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a R-squared of 16.21 with a Alpha of 3.91 and a Treynor Ratio of 1.21. Its Beta is 0.48 while GLD’s Standard Deviation is 16.58. Furthermore, the fund has a Sharpe Ratio of 0.12 and a Mean Return of 0.21.
The iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) has a Mean Return of 0.44 with a Sharpe Ratio of 0.55 and a Beta of 1.36. Its Treynor Ratio is 3.24 while EMB’s Alpha is 0.89. Furthermore, the fund has a R-squared of 23.34 and a Standard Deviation of 8.44.
GLD’s Mean Return is 0.23 points lower than that of EMB and its R-squared is 7.13 points lower. With a Standard Deviation of 16.58, GLD is slightly more volatile than EMB. The Alpha and Beta of GLD are 3.02 points higher and 0.88 points lower than EMB’s Alpha and Beta.
GLD had its best year in 2010 with an annual return of 27.25%. GLD’s worst year over the past decade yielded -28.09% and occurred in 2013. In most years the SPDR Gold Shares provided moderate returns such as in 2012, 2016, and 2011 where annual returns amounted to 5.26%, 8.69%, and 11.2% respectively.
The year 2012 was the strongest year for EMB, returning 17.64% on an annual basis. The poorest year for EMB in the last ten years was 2013, with a yield of -7.42%. Most years the iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2014, 2011, and 2016, when gains were 6.69%, 7.2%, and 9.41% respectively.
|Fund||Initial Balance||Final Balance||CAGR|
A $10,000 investment in GLD would have resulted in a final balance of $16,395. This is a profit of $6,395 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.81%.
With a $10,000 investment in EMB, the end total would have been $19,295. This equates to a $9,295 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.43%.
GLD’s CAGR is 0.63 percentage points lower than that of EMB and as a result, would have yielded $2,900 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, GLD performed worse than EMB by 0.63% annually.
Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:
P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!
1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!
2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!
3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).
4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.
5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!
To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.