The iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) and the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. EFA is a iShares Foreign Large Blend fund and IWD is a iShares Large Value fund. So, what’s the difference between EFA and IWD? And which fund is better?
The expense ratio of EFA is 0.13 percentage points higher than IWD’s (0.32% vs. 0.19%). EFA also has a lower exposure to the financial services sector and a higher standard deviation. Overall, EFA has provided lower returns than IWD over the past ten years.
In this article, we’ll compare EFA vs. IWD. We’ll look at holdings and industry exposure, as well as at their fund composition and performance. Moreover, I’ll also discuss EFA’s and IWD’s portfolio growth, risk metrics, and annual returns and examine how these affect their overall returns.
|Name||iShares MSCI EAFE ETF||iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF|
|Category||Foreign Large Blend||Large Value|
The iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) is a Foreign Large Blend fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 56.77B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 6.47% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 2.28% with an expense ratio of 0.32%.
The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) is a Large Value fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 54.1B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 11.40% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.57% with an expense ratio of 0.19%.
EFA’s dividend yield is 0.71% higher than that of IWD (2.28% vs. 1.57%). Also, EFA yielded on average 4.93% less per year over the past decade (6.47% vs. 11.40%). The expense ratio of EFA is 0.13 percentage points higher than IWD’s (0.32% vs. 0.19%).
The iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) has the most exposure to the Financial Services sector at 16.88%. This is followed by Industrials and Healthcare at 15.01% and 12.8% respectively. Utilities (3.35%), Energy (3.51%), and Communication Services (5.68%) only make up 12.54% of the fund’s total assets.
EFA’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Basic Materials, Technology, Consumer Defensive, Consumer Cyclical, and Healthcare stocks at 7.91%, 9.68%, 10.56%, 11.62%, and 12.8%.
The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) has the most exposure to the Financial Services sector at 20.43%. This is followed by Healthcare and Industrials at 17.78% and 11.77% respectively. Energy (4.76%), Utilities (4.88%), and Real Estate (4.94%) only make up 14.58% of the fund’s total assets.
IWD’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Cyclical, Consumer Defensive, Communication Services, Technology, and Industrials stocks at 5.62%, 7.76%, 8.67%, 10.28%, and 11.77%.
EFA is 3.55% less exposed to the Financial Services sector than IWD (16.88% vs 20.43%). EFA’s exposure to Industrials and Healthcare stocks is 3.24% higher and 4.98% lower respectively (15.01% vs. 11.77% and 12.8% vs. 17.78%). In total, Utilities, Energy, and Communication Services also make up 5.77% less of the fund’s holdings compared to IWD (12.54% vs. 18.31%).
|ASML Holding NV||1.69%|
|Roche Holding AG||1.55%|
|LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE||1.28%|
|Toyota Motor Corp||1.09%|
|AIA Group Ltd||0.88%|
EFA’s Top Holdings are Nestle SA, ASML Holding NV, Roche Holding AG, LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE, and Novartis AG at 2.11%, 1.69%, 1.55%, 1.28%, and 1.19%.
Toyota Motor Corp (1.09%), AstraZeneca PLC (0.92%), and Unilever PLC (0.9%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. AIA Group Ltd and SAP SE are also represented in the EFA’s holdings at 0.88% and 0.86%.
|Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B||2.58%|
|JPMorgan Chase & Co||2.25%|
|Johnson & Johnson||2.24%|
|UnitedHealth Group Inc||1.78%|
|Procter & Gamble Co||1.71%|
|The Walt Disney Co||1.5%|
|Bank of America Corp||1.43%|
|Comcast Corp Class A||1.33%|
|Exxon Mobil Corp||1.2%|
IWD’s Top Holdings are Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B, JPMorgan Chase & Co, Johnson & Johnson, UnitedHealth Group Inc, and Procter & Gamble Co at 2.58%, 2.25%, 2.24%, 1.78%, and 1.71%.
The Walt Disney Co (1.5%), Bank of America Corp (1.43%), and Comcast Corp Class A (1.33%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Exxon Mobil Corp and Pfizer Inc are also represented in the IWD’s holdings at 1.2% and 1.18%.
The iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) has a Treynor Ratio of 5.33 with a Beta of 0.98 and a Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. Its Mean Return is 0.57 while EFA’s R-squared is 96.78. Furthermore, the fund has a Standard Deviation of 15.01 and a Alpha of 0.47.
The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) has a Standard Deviation of 14.35 with a Treynor Ratio of 11.06 and a Alpha of -3.23. Its Mean Return is 1.03 while IWD’s R-squared is 92.38. Furthermore, the fund has a Beta of 1.02 and a Sharpe Ratio of 0.81.
EFA’s Mean Return is 0.46 points lower than that of IWD and its R-squared is 4.40 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 15.01, EFA is slightly more volatile than IWD. The Alpha and Beta of EFA are 3.70 points higher and 0.04 points lower than IWD’s Alpha and Beta.
EFA had its best year in 2017 with an annual return of 24.94%. EFA’s worst year over the past decade yielded -13.83% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2016, 2010, and 2020 where annual returns amounted to 0.96%, 7.52%, and 7.92% respectively.
The year 2013 was the strongest year for IWD, returning 32.18% on an annual basis. The poorest year for IWD in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -8.4%. Most years the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2014, 2017, and 2010, when gains were 13.21%, 13.47%, and 15.3% respectively.
|Fund||Initial Balance||Final Balance||CAGR|
A $10,000 investment in EFA would have resulted in a final balance of $18,269. This is a profit of $8,269 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.47%.
With a $10,000 investment in IWD, the end total would have been $30,746. This equates to a $20,746 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.40%.
EFA’s CAGR is 4.93 percentage points lower than that of IWD and as a result, would have yielded $12,477 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, EFA performed worse than IWD by 4.93% annually.
Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:
P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!
1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!
2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!
3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).
4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.
5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!
To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.