The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and the Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. EEM is a iShares Diversified Emerging Mkts fund and XLI is a SPDR State Street Global Advisors Industrials fund. So, what’s the difference between EEM and XLI? And which fund is better?
The expense ratio of EEM is 0.56 percentage points higher than XLI’s (0.68% vs. 0.12%). EEM also has a higher exposure to the technology sector and a higher standard deviation. Overall, EEM has provided lower returns than XLI over the past ten years.
In this article, we’ll compare EEM vs. XLI. We’ll look at risk metrics and performance, as well as at their fund composition and industry exposure. Moreover, I’ll also discuss EEM’s and XLI’s holdings, annual returns, and portfolio growth and examine how these affect their overall returns.
|Name||iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF||Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund|
|Category||Diversified Emerging Mkts||Industrials|
|Issuer||iShares||SPDR State Street Global Advisors|
The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) is a Diversified Emerging Mkts fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 30.33B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 5.47% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.48% with an expense ratio of 0.68%.
The Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) is a Industrials fund that is issued by SPDR State Street Global Advisors. It currently has 19.33B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 14.44% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.25% with an expense ratio of 0.12%.
EEM’s dividend yield is 0.23% higher than that of XLI (1.48% vs. 1.25%). Also, EEM yielded on average 8.97% less per year over the past decade (5.47% vs. 14.44%). The expense ratio of EEM is 0.56 percentage points higher than XLI’s (0.68% vs. 0.12%).
The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 21.36%. This is followed by Financial Services and Consumer Cyclical at 18.39% and 15.16% respectively. Utilities (1.99%), Industrials (4.61%), and Healthcare (5.06%) only make up 11.66% of the fund’s total assets.
EEM’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Energy, Consumer Defensive, Basic Materials, Communication Services, and Consumer Cyclical stocks at 5.17%, 5.45%, 9.07%, 11.76%, and 15.16%.
The Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) has the most exposure to the Industrials sector at 97.49%. This is followed by Technology and Consumer Cyclical at 1.82% and 0.69% respectively. Financial Services (0.0%), Real Estate (0.0%), and Consumer Defensive (0.0%) only make up 0.00% of the fund’s total assets.
XLI’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Healthcare, Utilities, Communication Services, Energy, and Consumer Cyclical stocks at 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.69%.
EEM is 19.54% more exposed to the Technology sector than XLI (21.36% vs 1.82%). EEM’s exposure to Financial Services and Consumer Cyclical stocks is 18.39% higher and 14.47% higher respectively (18.39% vs. 0.0% and 15.16% vs. 0.69%). In total, Utilities, Industrials, and Healthcare also make up 85.83% less of the fund’s holdings compared to XLI (11.66% vs. 97.49%).
|Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd||6.36%|
|Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares||4.58%|
|Tencent Holdings Ltd||4.41%|
|Samsung Electronics Co Ltd||4.05%|
|Naspers Ltd Class N||1.04%|
|Reliance Industries Ltd Shs Dematerialised||0.97%|
|China Construction Bank Corp Class H||0.83%|
EEM’s Top Holdings are Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares, Tencent Holdings Ltd, Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, and Meituan at 6.36%, 4.58%, 4.41%, 4.05%, and 1.24%.
Vale SA (1.04%), Naspers Ltd Class N (1.04%), and Reliance Industries Ltd Shs Dematerialised (0.97%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Infosys Ltd and China Construction Bank Corp Class H are also represented in the EEM’s holdings at 0.92% and 0.83%.
|Honeywell International Inc||4.9%|
|United Parcel Service Inc Class B||4.84%|
|Union Pacific Corp||4.7%|
|Raytheon Technologies Corp||4.16%|
|General Electric Co||3.8%|
|Deere & Co||3.54%|
|Lockheed Martin Corp||2.98%|
XLI’s Top Holdings are Honeywell International Inc, United Parcel Service Inc Class B, Union Pacific Corp, Boeing Co, and Raytheon Technologies Corp at 4.9%, 4.84%, 4.7%, 4.24%, and 4.16%.
Caterpillar Inc (3.84%), General Electric Co (3.8%), and 3M Co (3.7%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Deere & Co and Lockheed Martin Corp are also represented in the XLI’s holdings at 3.54% and 2.98%.
The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a Beta of 1.08 with a Treynor Ratio of 2.22 and a Alpha of -2.33. Its R-squared is 83.5 while EEM’s Mean Return is 0.38. Furthermore, the fund has a Standard Deviation of 17.79 and a Sharpe Ratio of 0.22.
The Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) has a Standard Deviation of 17.13 with a Mean Return of 1.14 and a Treynor Ratio of 11.34. Its Sharpe Ratio is 0.76 while XLI’s Alpha is 2.38. Furthermore, the fund has a Beta of 1.08 and a R-squared of 78.97.
EEM’s Mean Return is 0.76 points lower than that of XLI and its R-squared is 4.53 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 17.79, EEM is slightly more volatile than XLI. The Alpha and Beta of EEM are 4.71 points lower and 0.00 points lower than XLI’s Alpha and Beta.
EEM had its best year in 2017 with an annual return of 36.42%. EEM’s worst year over the past decade yielded -18.87% and occurred in 2011. In most years the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2016, and 2010 where annual returns amounted to -2.82%, 10.51%, and 15.93% respectively.
The year 2013 was the strongest year for XLI, returning 40.44% on an annual basis. The poorest year for XLI in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -13.1%. Most years the Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund has given investors modest returns, such as in 2020, 2012, and 2016, when gains were 11.0%, 14.86%, and 19.93% respectively.
|Fund||Initial Balance||Final Balance||CAGR|
A $10,000 investment in EEM would have resulted in a final balance of $15,578. This is a profit of $5,578 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.47%.
With a $10,000 investment in XLI, the end total would have been $39,853. This equates to a $29,853 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.44%.
EEM’s CAGR is 8.97 percentage points lower than that of XLI and as a result, would have yielded $24,275 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, EEM performed worse than XLI by 8.97% annually.
Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:
P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!
1) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!
2) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).
3) If you are interested in crypto, check out Gemini. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to the growing crypto space and Gemini has just been a breeze to use. Once you register, make sure to also open an Active Trader account to buy crypto at the lowest fees on the market (just 0.03%!).
To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.