Skip to content

EEM vs. VHT: What’s The Difference?

The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and the Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares (VHT) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. EEM is a iShares Diversified Emerging Mkts fund and VHT is a Vanguard Health fund. So, what’s the difference between EEM and VHT? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of EEM is 0.58 percentage points higher than VHT’s (0.68% vs. 0.1%). EEM also has a higher exposure to the technology sector and a higher standard deviation. Overall, EEM has provided lower returns than VHT over the past ten years.

In this article, we’ll compare EEM vs. VHT. We’ll look at fund composition and industry exposure, as well as at their annual returns and performance. Moreover, I’ll also discuss EEM’s and VHT’s holdings, risk metrics, and portfolio growth and examine how these affect their overall returns.

TIP: Keep track of all your investments with Personal Capital. I use this amazing tool to aggregate all investments in one place and make sure I'm on track to financial freedom. Oh, and did I mention it's free? Try it out here (link to Personal Capital).

Summary

EEMVHT
NameiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETFVanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares
CategoryDiversified Emerging MktsHealth
IssueriSharesVanguard
AUM30.33B17.94B
Avg. Return5.47%16.04%
Div. Yield1.48%1.15%
Expense Ratio0.68%0.1%

The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) is a Diversified Emerging Mkts fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 30.33B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 5.47% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.48% with an expense ratio of 0.68%.

The Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares (VHT) is a Health fund that is issued by Vanguard. It currently has 17.94B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 16.04% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.15% with an expense ratio of 0.1%.

EEM’s dividend yield is 0.33% higher than that of VHT (1.48% vs. 1.15%). Also, EEM yielded on average 10.57% less per year over the past decade (5.47% vs. 16.04%). The expense ratio of EEM is 0.58 percentage points higher than VHT’s (0.68% vs. 0.1%).

FYI: The best way I've found to invest in ETFs is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

EEM vs. VHT - Industry Exposure

EEMVHT
Technology21.36%0.05%
Industrials4.61%0.05%
Energy5.17%0.0%
Communication Services11.76%0.0%
Utilities1.99%0.0%
Healthcare5.06%99.57%
Consumer Defensive5.45%0.0%
Real Estate1.98%0.0%
Financial Services18.39%0.02%
Consumer Cyclical15.16%0.0%
Basic Materials9.07%0.31%

The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 21.36%. This is followed by Financial Services and Consumer Cyclical at 18.39% and 15.16% respectively. Utilities (1.99%), Industrials (4.61%), and Healthcare (5.06%) only make up 11.66% of the fund’s total assets.

EEM’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Energy, Consumer Defensive, Basic Materials, Communication Services, and Consumer Cyclical stocks at 5.17%, 5.45%, 9.07%, 11.76%, and 15.16%.

The Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares (VHT) has the most exposure to the Healthcare sector at 99.57%. This is followed by Basic Materials and Technology at 0.31% and 0.05% respectively. Real Estate (0.0%), Consumer Defensive (0.0%), and Utilities (0.0%) only make up 0.00% of the fund’s total assets.

VHT’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Communication Services, Energy, Financial Services, Industrials, and Technology stocks at 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.02%, 0.05%, and 0.05%.

EEM is 21.31% more exposed to the Technology sector than VHT (21.36% vs 0.05%). EEM’s exposure to Financial Services and Consumer Cyclical stocks is 18.37% higher and 15.16% higher respectively (18.39% vs. 0.02% and 15.16% vs. 0.0%). In total, Utilities, Industrials, and Healthcare also make up 87.96% less of the fund’s holdings compared to VHT (11.66% vs. 99.62%).

Holdings

EEM - Holdings

EEM HoldingsWeight
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd6.36%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares4.58%
Tencent Holdings Ltd4.41%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd4.05%
Meituan1.24%
Vale SA1.04%
Naspers Ltd Class N1.04%
Reliance Industries Ltd Shs Dematerialised0.97%
Infosys Ltd0.92%
China Construction Bank Corp Class H0.83%

EEM’s Top Holdings are Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares, Tencent Holdings Ltd, Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, and Meituan at 6.36%, 4.58%, 4.41%, 4.05%, and 1.24%.

Vale SA (1.04%), Naspers Ltd Class N (1.04%), and Reliance Industries Ltd Shs Dematerialised (0.97%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Infosys Ltd and China Construction Bank Corp Class H are also represented in the EEM’s holdings at 0.92% and 0.83%.

VHT - Holdings

VHT HoldingsWeight
Johnson & Johnson7.34%
UnitedHealth Group Inc6.44%
Pfizer Inc3.7%
Abbott Laboratories3.48%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc3.37%
AbbVie Inc3.37%
Merck & Co Inc3.33%
Eli Lilly and Co3.17%
Danaher Corp2.91%
Medtronic PLC2.83%

VHT’s Top Holdings are Johnson & Johnson, UnitedHealth Group Inc, Pfizer Inc, Abbott Laboratories, and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc at 7.34%, 6.44%, 3.7%, 3.48%, and 3.37%.

AbbVie Inc (3.37%), Merck & Co Inc (3.33%), and Eli Lilly and Co (3.17%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Danaher Corp and Medtronic PLC are also represented in the VHT’s holdings at 2.91% and 2.83%.

NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).

Risk Analysis

EEMVHT
Mean Return0.381.33
R-squared83.559.86
Std. Deviation17.7913.58
Alpha-2.337.99
Beta1.080.75
Sharpe Ratio0.221.13
Treynor Ratio2.2220.74

The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a R-squared of 83.5 with a Beta of 1.08 and a Alpha of -2.33. Its Treynor Ratio is 2.22 while EEM’s Standard Deviation is 17.79. Furthermore, the fund has a Sharpe Ratio of 0.22 and a Mean Return of 0.38.

The Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares (VHT) has a Mean Return of 1.33 with a Standard Deviation of 13.58 and a R-squared of 59.86. Its Alpha is 7.99 while VHT’s Beta is 0.75. Furthermore, the fund has a Sharpe Ratio of 1.13 and a Treynor Ratio of 20.74.

EEM’s Mean Return is 0.95 points lower than that of VHT and its R-squared is 23.64 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 17.79, EEM is slightly more volatile than VHT. The Alpha and Beta of EEM are 10.32 points lower and 0.33 points higher than VHT’s Alpha and Beta.

FYI: Another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector is by investing in real estate debt. Groundfloor offers fantastic short-term, high-yield bonds that can add diversification to your portfolio!

Performance

Annual Returns

EEM vs. VHT - Annual Returns

YearEEMVHT
202017.56%18.21%
201917.67%21.97%
2018-14.98%5.55%
201736.42%23.34%
201610.51%-3.33%
2015-15.41%7.22%
2014-2.82%25.38%
2013-3.14%42.67%
201217.32%19.1%
2011-18.87%10.57%
201015.93%5.75%

EEM had its best year in 2017 with an annual return of 36.42%. EEM’s worst year over the past decade yielded -18.87% and occurred in 2011. In most years the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2014, 2016, and 2010 where annual returns amounted to -2.82%, 10.51%, and 15.93% respectively.

The year 2013 was the strongest year for VHT, returning 42.67% on an annual basis. The poorest year for VHT in the last ten years was 2016, with a yield of -3.33%. Most years the Vanguard Health Care Index Fund ETF Shares has given investors modest returns, such as in 2011, 2020, and 2012, when gains were 10.57%, 18.21%, and 19.1% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

EEM vs. VHT - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
EEM$10,000$15,5785.47%
VHT$10,000$48,46416.04%

A $10,000 investment in EEM would have resulted in a final balance of $15,578. This is a profit of $5,578 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.47%.

With a $10,000 investment in VHT, the end total would have been $48,464. This equates to a $38,464 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 16.04%.

EEM’s CAGR is 10.57 percentage points lower than that of VHT and as a result, would have yielded $32,886 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, EEM performed worse than VHT by 10.57% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.