The Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) and the iShares National Muni Bond ETF (MUB) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. BSV is a Vanguard Short-Term Bond fund and MUB is a iShares Muni National Interm fund. So, what’s the difference between BSV and MUB? And which fund is better?
The expense ratio of BSV is 0.02 percentage points lower than MUB’s (0.05% vs. 0.07%). BSV is mostly comprised of AAA bonds and MUB has a high exposure to AA bond. Overall, BSV has provided lower returns than MUB over the past ten years.
In this article, we’ll compare BSV vs. MUB. We’ll look at industry exposure and fund composition, as well as at their portfolio growth and annual returns. Moreover, I’ll also discuss BSV’s and MUB’s performance, holdings, and risk metrics and examine how these affect their overall returns.
|Name||Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares||iShares National Muni Bond ETF|
|Category||Short-Term Bond||Muni National Interm|
The Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) is a Short-Term Bond fund that is issued by Vanguard. It currently has 67.71B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 2.27% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.48% with an expense ratio of 0.05%.
The iShares National Muni Bond ETF (MUB) is a Muni National Interm fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 22.71B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 4.04% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.96% with an expense ratio of 0.07%.
BSV’s dividend yield is 0.48% lower than that of MUB (1.48% vs. 1.96%). Also, BSV yielded on average 1.77% less per year over the past decade (2.27% vs. 4.04%). The expense ratio of BSV is 0.02 percentage points lower than MUB’s (0.05% vs. 0.07%).
|BSV Bond Sectors||Weight|
BSV’s Top Bond Sectors are ratings of AAA, BBB, A, AA, and Others at 71.65%, 13.08%, 11.95%, 3.28%, and 0.03%. The fund is less weighted towards Below B (0.01%), B (0.0%), and BB (0.0%) rated bonds.
|MUB Bond Sectors||Weight|
MUB’s Top Bond Sectors are ratings of AA, AAA, A, BBB, and Others at 60.38%, 18.39%, 15.04%, 6.0%, and 0.17%. The fund is less weighted towards BB (0.02%), Below B (0.0%), and B (0.0%) rated bonds.
The Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) has a Mean Return of 0.16 with a Alpha of 0.21 and a Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. Its R-squared is 78.38 while BSV’s Beta is 0.38. Furthermore, the fund has a Treynor Ratio of 3.33 and a Standard Deviation of 1.33.
The iShares National Muni Bond ETF (MUB) has a Standard Deviation of 3.68 with a Sharpe Ratio of 0.88 and a Mean Return of 0.32. Its Beta is 1.01 while MUB’s R-squared is 99. Furthermore, the fund has a Alpha of -0.46 and a Treynor Ratio of 3.2.
BSV’s Mean Return is 0.16 points lower than that of MUB and its R-squared is 20.62 points lower. With a Standard Deviation of 1.33, BSV is slightly less volatile than MUB. The Alpha and Beta of BSV are 0.67 points higher and 0.63 points lower than MUB’s Alpha and Beta.
BSV had its best year in 2019 with an annual return of 4.92%. BSV’s worst year over the past decade yielded 0.17% and occurred in 2013. In most years the Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares provided moderate returns such as in 2018, 2016, and 2012 where annual returns amounted to 1.34%, 1.42%, and 1.98% respectively.
The year 2011 was the strongest year for MUB, returning 10.85% on an annual basis. The poorest year for MUB in the last ten years was 2013, with a yield of -3.26%. Most years the iShares National Muni Bond ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2015, 2017, and 2020, when gains were 2.99%, 4.61%, and 4.87% respectively.
|Fund||Initial Balance||Final Balance||CAGR|
A $10,000 investment in BSV would have resulted in a final balance of $12,785. This is a profit of $2,785 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 2.27%.
With a $10,000 investment in MUB, the end total would have been $15,333. This equates to a $5,333 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.04%.
BSV’s CAGR is 1.77 percentage points lower than that of MUB and as a result, would have yielded $2,548 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, BSV performed worse than MUB by 1.77% annually.
Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:
P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!
1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!
2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!
3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).
4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.
5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!
To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.