Skip to content

ACWI vs. DFAC: What’s The Difference?

The iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and the Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) are both among the Top 100 ETFs. ACWI is a iShares N/A fund and DFAC is a Dimensional Fund Advisors Large Blend fund. So, what’s the difference between ACWI and DFAC? And which fund is better?

The expense ratio of ACWI is 0.13 percentage points higher than DFAC’s (0.32% vs. 0.19%). ACWI also has a lower exposure to the technology sector and a lower standard deviation. Overall, ACWI has provided lower returns than DFAC over the past 11 years.

In this article, we’ll compare ACWI vs. DFAC. We’ll look at industry exposure and risk metrics, as well as at their holdings and fund composition. Moreover, I’ll also discuss ACWI’s and DFAC’s performance, annual returns, and portfolio growth and examine how these affect their overall returns.

TIP: Keep track of all your investments with Personal Capital. I use this amazing tool to aggregate all investments in one place and make sure I'm on track to financial freedom. Oh, and did I mention it's free? Try it out here (link to Personal Capital).

Summary

ACWIDFAC
NameiShares MSCI ACWI ETFDimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
CategoryN/ALarge Blend
IssueriSharesDimensional Fund Advisors
AUM16.85B13.53B
Avg. Return10.21%13.93%
Div. Yield1.39%1.0%
Expense Ratio0.32%0.19%

The iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) is a N/A fund that is issued by iShares. It currently has 16.85B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 10.21% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.39% with an expense ratio of 0.32%.

The Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) is a Large Blend fund that is issued by Dimensional Fund Advisors. It currently has 13.53B total assets under management and has yielded an average annual return of 13.93% over the past 10 years. The fund has a dividend yield of 1.0% with an expense ratio of 0.19%.

ACWI’s dividend yield is 0.39% higher than that of DFAC (1.39% vs. 1.0%). Also, ACWI yielded on average 3.72% less per year over the past decade (10.21% vs. 13.93%). The expense ratio of ACWI is 0.13 percentage points higher than DFAC’s (0.32% vs. 0.19%).

FYI: The best way I've found to invest in ETFs is through M1 Finance. It's free and you even get an instant line of credit! Have a look here (link to M1 Finance).

Fund Composition

Industry Exposure

ACWI vs. DFAC - Industry Exposure

ACWIDFAC
Technology20.41%22.81%
Industrials9.65%14.13%
Energy3.48%2.67%
Communication Services9.87%7.63%
Utilities2.61%1.54%
Healthcare11.74%12.09%
Consumer Defensive7.15%5.94%
Real Estate2.75%0.37%
Financial Services15.58%16.17%
Consumer Cyclical12.01%13.09%
Basic Materials4.73%3.56%

The iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 20.41%. This is followed by Financial Services and Consumer Cyclical at 15.58% and 12.01% respectively. Real Estate (2.75%), Energy (3.48%), and Basic Materials (4.73%) only make up 10.96% of the fund’s total assets.

ACWI’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Industrials, Communication Services, Healthcare, and Consumer Cyclical stocks at 7.15%, 9.65%, 9.87%, 11.74%, and 12.01%.

The Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) has the most exposure to the Technology sector at 22.81%. This is followed by Financial Services and Industrials at 16.17% and 14.13% respectively. Utilities (1.54%), Energy (2.67%), and Basic Materials (3.56%) only make up 7.77% of the fund’s total assets.

DFAC’s mid-section with moderate exposure is comprised of Consumer Defensive, Communication Services, Healthcare, Consumer Cyclical, and Industrials stocks at 5.94%, 7.63%, 12.09%, 13.09%, and 14.13%.

ACWI is 2.40% less exposed to the Technology sector than DFAC (20.41% vs 22.81%). ACWI’s exposure to Financial Services and Consumer Cyclical stocks is 0.59% lower and 1.08% lower respectively (15.58% vs. 16.17% and 12.01% vs. 13.09%). In total, Real Estate, Energy, and Basic Materials also make up 4.36% more of the fund’s holdings compared to DFAC (10.96% vs. 6.60%).

Holdings

ACWI - Holdings

ACWI HoldingsWeight
Apple Inc3.44%
Microsoft Corp2.91%
Amazon.com Inc2.21%
Facebook Inc A1.25%
Alphabet Inc Class C1.12%
Alphabet Inc A1.09%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd0.79%
Tesla Inc0.78%
NVIDIA Corp0.74%
JPMorgan Chase & Co0.71%

ACWI’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Facebook Inc A, and Alphabet Inc Class C at 3.44%, 2.91%, 2.21%, 1.25%, and 1.12%.

Alphabet Inc A (1.09%), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd (0.79%), and Tesla Inc (0.78%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. NVIDIA Corp and JPMorgan Chase & Co are also represented in the ACWI’s holdings at 0.74% and 0.71%.

DFAC - Holdings

DFAC HoldingsWeight
Apple Inc4.7%
Microsoft Corp3.81%
Amazon.com Inc2.39%
Johnson & Johnson1.05%
Facebook Inc Class A1.05%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.0%
Alphabet Inc Class C0.85%
Alphabet Inc Class A0.84%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B0.75%
Visa Inc Class A0.74%

DFAC’s Top Holdings are Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc, Johnson & Johnson, and Facebook Inc Class A at 4.7%, 3.81%, 2.39%, 1.05%, and 1.05%.

JPMorgan Chase & Co (1.0%), Alphabet Inc Class C (0.85%), and Alphabet Inc Class A (0.84%) have a slightly smaller but still significant weight. Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B and Visa Inc Class A are also represented in the DFAC’s holdings at 0.75% and 0.74%.

NOTE: The easiest way to add diversification to your portfolio is to invest in real estate through Fundrise. You can become private real estate investor without the burden of property management! Check it out here (link to Fundrise).

Risk Analysis

ACWIDFAC
Mean Return0.891.19
R-squared99.9695.1
Std. Deviation14.0515.55
Alpha0.15-2.75
Beta11.12
Sharpe Ratio0.710.88
Treynor Ratio9.4511.85

The iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a Sharpe Ratio of 0.71 with a Treynor Ratio of 9.45 and a Alpha of 0.15. Its Standard Deviation is 14.05 while ACWI’s Beta is 1. Furthermore, the fund has a R-squared of 99.96 and a Mean Return of 0.89.

The Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) has a Standard Deviation of 15.55 with a Mean Return of 1.19 and a Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. Its R-squared is 95.1 while DFAC’s Treynor Ratio is 11.85. Furthermore, the fund has a Beta of 1.12 and a Alpha of -2.75.

ACWI’s Mean Return is 0.30 points lower than that of DFAC and its R-squared is 4.86 points higher. With a Standard Deviation of 14.05, ACWI is slightly less volatile than DFAC. The Alpha and Beta of ACWI are 2.90 points higher and 0.12 points lower than DFAC’s Alpha and Beta.

FYI: Another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector is by investing in real estate debt. Groundfloor offers fantastic short-term, high-yield bonds that can add diversification to your portfolio!

Performance

Annual Returns

ACWI vs. DFAC - Annual Returns

YearACWIDFAC
202016.38%15.8%
201926.7%29.54%
2018-9.15%-9.43%
201724.35%18.82%
20168.22%16.31%
2015-2.39%-2.53%
20144.64%9.56%
201322.91%37.55%
201215.99%17.93%
2011-7.6%-1.96%
201012.31%21.67%

ACWI had its best year in 2019 with an annual return of 26.7%. ACWI’s worst year over the past decade yielded -9.15% and occurred in 2018. In most years the iShares MSCI ACWI ETF provided moderate returns such as in 2016, 2010, and 2012 where annual returns amounted to 8.22%, 12.31%, and 15.99% respectively.

The year 2013 was the strongest year for DFAC, returning 37.55% on an annual basis. The poorest year for DFAC in the last ten years was 2018, with a yield of -9.43%. Most years the Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF has given investors modest returns, such as in 2020, 2016, and 2012, when gains were 15.8%, 16.31%, and 17.93% respectively.

Portfolio Growth

ACWI vs. DFAC - Portfolio Growth

FundInitial BalanceFinal BalanceCAGR
ACWI$10,000$27,24110.21%
DFAC$10,000$38,79613.93%

A $10,000 investment in ACWI would have resulted in a final balance of $27,241. This is a profit of $17,241 over 11 years and amounts to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.21%.

With a $10,000 investment in DFAC, the end total would have been $38,796. This equates to a $28,796 profit over 11 years and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.93%.

ACWI’s CAGR is 3.72 percentage points lower than that of DFAC and as a result, would have yielded $11,555 less on a $10,000 investment. Thus, ACWI performed worse than DFAC by 3.72% annually.


Current recommendations:

Over the past years, I have discovered several tools and products that have helped me tremendously on my path to financial freedom:

P.S.: The links below are affiliate links, which means I receive a small commission at no extra cost to you when you sign up for one of the services. Thank you for your support!

1)Personal Capital is simply the best tool out there to track your net worth and plan for financial freedom. Just their retirement planner alone has become an invaluable tool to keep myself on track financially. Try it out, it's free!

2) Take a look at M1 Finance, my favorite broker. I love how easy it is to invest and maintain my portfolio with them. I can set up automatic transfers, rebalance my portfolio with one click and even borrow up to 35% of my assets at super low interest rates!

3) Fundrise is by far the best way I've found to invest in Real Estate. You can diversify your portfolio by investing in their eREITs or even allocate capital to individual properties (without the hassle of managing tenants!).

4) Groundfloor is another great way to get exposure to the real estate sector by investing in short-term, high-yield real estate debt. Current returns are >10% and you can get started with just $10.

5) If you are interested in startup investing, check out Mainvest. I've started allocating a small amount of assets to invest in and support small businesses. Return targets are between 10-25% and you can start with just $100!

To see all of my most up-to-date recommendations, check out the Recommended Tools section.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *